Accidental activists: headhunters as marginal diversity actors in institutional change towards more women on boards

Human Resource Management Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 285-303

  Doldor, Elena ^a   Sealy, Ruth ^b   Vinnicombe, Susan ^c  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

change agency; diversity management; headhunters; institutional change; women on boards

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978042602     PISSN: 09545395     EISSN: 17488583     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12107     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alvesson, M. (1996). ‘From procedure and abstraction to reflexivity and situation’. Leadership Quarterly, 7: 4, 455–485.
2. Battilana, J., Leca, B. and Boxenbaum, E. (2009). ‘How actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship’. Academy of Management Annals, 3: 1, 65–107.
3. Beaverstock, J.V., Faulconbridge, J.R. and Hall, S.J.E. (2010). ‘Professionalization, legitimization and the creation of executive search markets in Europe’. Journal of Economic Geography, 10: 6, 825–843.
4. Callero, P.L. (1994). ‘From role playing to role using: understanding role as a resource’. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57: 3, 228–243.
5. Coverdill, J.E. and Finlay, W. (1998). ‘Fit and skill in employee selection: insights from a study of headhunters’. Qualitative Sociology, 21: 2, 105–127.
6. Creed, W.E.D., DeJordy, R. and Lok, J. (2010). ‘Being the change: resolving institutional contradiction through identity work’. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 6, 1336–1364.
7. Davies, M. (2011). Women on boards – the Davies report (No. URN 11/745), London: GEO/BIS.
8. Davies, M. (2013). Women on boards – the Davies report (No. URN 13/P135), London: GEO/BIS.
9. Delbridge, R. and Edwards, T. (2008). ‘Challenging conventions: roles and processes during non-isomorphic institutional change’. Human Relations, 61: 3, 299–325.
10. Faulconbridge, J.R., Beaverstock, J.V., Hall, S. and Hewitson, A. (2009). ‘The “war for talent”: the gatekeeper role of executive search firms in elite labour markets’. Geoforum, 40: 5, 800–808.
11. Fligstein, N. (1997). ‘Social skill and institutional theory’. American Behavioral Scientist, 40: 4, 397–405.
12. Grosvold, J. and Brammer, S. (2011). ‘National institutional systems as antecedents of female board representation: an empirical study’. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19: 2, 116–135.
13. Hamori, M. (2010). ‘Who gets headhunted and who gets ahead? The impact of search firms on executive careers’. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24: 4, 46–59.
14. Hodgson, D., Paton, S. and Muzio, D. (2015). ‘Something old, something new? Competing logics and the hybrid nature of new corporate professions’. British Journal of Management, 26: 4, 745–759.
15. Khurana, R. (2002). Searching for a Corporate Savior: The Irrational Quest for Charismatic CEOs, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. Kirton, G. and Greene, A.M. (2009). ‘The costs and opportunities of doing diversity work in mainstream organisations’. Human Resource Management Journal, 19: 2, 159–175.
17. Kirton, G., Greene, A.M. and Dean, D. (2007). ‘British diversity professionals as change agents – radicals, tempered radicals or liberal reformers?’. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18: 11, 1979–1994.
18. Klarsfeld, A., Ng, E. and Tatli, A. (2012). ‘Social regulation and diversity management: a comparative study of France, Canada and the UK’. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 18: 4, 309–327.
19. Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R. and Beca, B. (2006). ‘Institutional work: refocusing institutional studies of organization’. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20: 1, 52–58.
20. Layder, D. (1998). Sociological Practice: Linking Theory and Social Research, London: Sage.
21. Levy, D. and Scully, M. (2007). ‘The institutional entrepreneur as modern prince: the strategic face of power in contested fields’. Organization Studies, 28: 7, 971–991.
22. Maguire, S., Hardy, C. and Lawrence, T. (2004). ‘Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada’. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 5, 657–679.
23. Meyerson, D. and Scully, M.A. (1995). ‘Tempered radicalism and politics of ambivalence and change’. Organization Science, 6: 5, 585–600.
24. Mikecz, R. (2012). ‘Interviewing elites: addressing methodological issues’. Qualitative Inquiry, 18: 6, 482–493.
25. Oswick, C. and Noon, M. (2014). ‘Discourses of diversity, equality and inclusion: trenchant formulations or transient fashions?’. British Journal of Management, 25: 1, 23–39.
26. Özbilgin, M.F. and Tatli, A. (2011). ‘Mapping out the field of equality and diversity: rise of individualism and voluntarism’. Human Relations, 64: 9, 1229–1253.
27. Powell, W.W. and Colyvas, J.A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin-Andersson and R. Suddaby (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, London: Sage, pp. 276–298.
28. Reay, T. and Hinings, C.R. (2005). ‘The recomposition of an organizational field: health care in Alberta’. Organization Studies, 26: 3, 351–384.
29. Reay, T., Golden-Biddle, K. and Germann, K. (2006). ‘Legitimizing a new role: small wins and microprocesses of change’. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 5, 977–998.
30. Seierstad, C., Warner-Søderholm, G., Torchia, M. and Huse, M. (2015). ‘Increasing the number of women on boards: the role of actors and processes’. Journal of Business Ethics, doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2715-0.
31. Seo, M.G. and Creed, D.W.E. (2002). ‘Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: a dialectical perspective’. The Academy of Management Review, 27: 2, 222–247.
32. Silverman, D. (2013). Doing Qualitative Research, 4th edn, London: Sage.
33. Suddaby, R. and Greenwood, R. (2005). ‘Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 1, 35–67.
34. Sweeney, C. (2014). Women on boards: voluntary code for executive search firms: taking the next step. No. BIS/14/640. London: BIS.
35. Tatli, A. (2011). ‘A multi-layered exploration of the diversity management field: diversity discourses, practices and practitioners in the UK’. British Journal of Management, 22: 2, 238–253.
36. Tatli, A., Nicolopoulou, K., Özbilgin, M., Karatas-Ozkan, M. and Öztürk, M.B. (2015). ‘Questioning impact: interconnection between extra-organizational resources and agency of equality and diversity officers’. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26: 9, 1243–1258.
37. Terjesen, S. and Sealy, R. (2016). ‘Board gender quotas: exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26: 1, 23–65.
38. Terjesen, S., Aguilera, R.V. and Lorenz, R. (2014). ‘Legislating a woman's seat on the board: institutional factors driving gender quotas for boards of directors’. Journal of Business Ethics, 128: 2, 233–251.
39. Thornton, P. and Occasio, W. (1999). ‘Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1999’. American Journal of Sociology, 105: 3, 801–843.
40. Tienari, J., Meriläinen, S., Holgersson, C. and Bendl, R. (2013). ‘And then there are none: on the exclusion of women in processes of executive search’. Gender in Management, 28: 1, 43–62.
41. VCC (2014). Voluntary code of conduct for executive search firms. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/208464/voluntary-code-of-conduct-for-executive-search-firms.pdf, accessed 8 March 2016.
42. Vinnicombe, S., Doldor, E., Sealy, R., Pryce, P. and Turner, C. (2015). Female FTSE board report 2015: putting UK progress into a global perspective. Cranfield University School of Management.
43. Yang, Y. and Konrad, A.M. (2011). ‘Understanding diversity management practices: implications of institutional theory and resource-based theory’. Group & Organization Management, 36: 1, 6–38.
44. Yin, R.K. (2012). Applications of Case Study Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.