Within- and between individual variability of personality characteristics and physical exercise

Journal of Research in Personality

Volumn 69, Issue , 2017, Pages 139-148

  Mõttus, René ^a,b   Epskamp, Sacha ^c   Francis, Adam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Exercising; Personality states; Personality traits; Physical activity; Within individual variability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84977666567     PISSN: 00926566     EISSN: 10957251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.017     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bäckström, M., Björklund, F., Larsson, M.R., Criterion validity is maintained when items are evaluatively neutralized: Evidence from a full-scale Five-factor Model inventory. European Journal of Personality 28 (2014), 620–633, 10.1002/per.1960.
2. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Retrieved from , 2015 Available from arXiv: 1406.5823 [Stat].
3. Blair, S.N., Physical inactivity: The biggest public health problem of the 21st century. British Journal of Sports Medicine 43 (2009), 1–2.
4. Bleidorn, W., Linking personality states, current social roles and major life goals. European Journal of Personality 23 (2009), 509–530, 10.1002/per.731.
5. Borkenau, P., Ostendorf, F., The Big Five as states: How useful is the Five-Factor Model to describe intraindividual variations over time?. Journal of Research in Personality 32 (1998), 202–221, 10.1006/jrpe.1997.2206.
6. Bossmann, T., Kanning, M., Koudela-Hamila, S., Hey, S., Ebner-Priemer, U., The association between short periods of everyday life activities and affective states: A replication study using ambulatory assessment. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 2013, 102, 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00102.
7. Buerkner, P.-C., Brms: Bayesian regression models using Stan. R package version 0.9.1. , 2016.
8. Dunton, G.F., Huh, J., Leventhal, A.M., Riggs, N., Hedeker, D., Spruijt-Metz, D., Pentz, M.A., Momentary assessment of affect, physical feeling states, and physical activity in children. Health Psychology 33 (2014), 255–263, 10.1037/a0032640.
9. Enders, C.K., Tofighi, D., Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods 12 (2007), 121–138, 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121.
10. Feuerhahn, N., Sonnentag, S., Woll, A., Exercise after work, psychological mediators, and affect: A day-level study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 23 (2014), 62–79, 10.1080/1359432X.2012.709965.
11. Fleeson, W., Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80 (2001), 1011–1027, 10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011.
12. Fleeson, W., Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior. Journal of Personality 75 (2007), 825–862, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00458.x.
13. Fleeson, W., Perspectives on the person: Rapid growth and opportunities for integration. Deaux, K., Snyder, M., (eds.) The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology, 2012, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, US, 33–63.
14. Fleeson, W., Jayawickreme, E., Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality 56 (2015), 82–92, 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009.
15. Huang, J.L., Ryan, A.M., Beyond personality traits: A study of personality states and situational contingencies in customer service jobs. Personnel Psychology 64 (2011), 451–488, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01216.x.
16. Judge, T.A., Simon, L.S., Hurst, C., Kelley, K., What I experienced yesterday is who I am today: Relationship of work motivations and behaviors to within-individual variation in the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology 99 (2014), 199–221.
17. Kanning, M.K., Ebner-Priemer, U.W., Schlicht, W.M., How to investigate within-subject associations between physical activity and momentary affective states in everyday life: A position statement based on a literature overview. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 2013, 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00187.
18. Kievit, R.A., Frankenhuis, W.E., Waldorp, L.J., Borsboom, D., Simpson's paradox in psychological science: A practical guide. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 2013, 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00513.
19. Kühnhausen, J., Leonhardt, A., Dirk, J., Schmiedek, F., Physical activity and affect in elementary school children's daily lives. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 2013, 456, 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00456.
20. McCabe, K.O., Fleeson, W., What is Extraversion for? Integrating trait and motivational perspectives and identifying the purpose of Extraversion. Psychological Science, 2012, 10.1177/0956797612444904.
21. McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T., NEO inventories professional manual. 2010, Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.
22. McCrae, R.R., John, O.P., An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality 60 (1992), 175–215, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x.
23. Minbashian, A., Wood, R.E., Beckmann, N., Task-contingent conscientiousness as a unit of personality at work. The Journal of Applied Psychology 95 (2010), 793–806, 10.1037/a0020016.
24. Mõttus, R., Towards more rigorous personality trait-outcome research. European Journal of Personality, 2016, 10.1002/per.2041.
25. Mõttus, R., Realo, A., Allik, J., Esko, T., Metspalu, A., Johnson, W., Within-trait heterogeneity in age group differences in personality domains and facets: Implications for the development and coherence of personality traits. PLoS ONE, 10, 2015, e0119667, 10.1371/journal.pone.0119667.
26. Ozer, D.J., Benet-Martínez, V., Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology 57 (2006), 401–421, 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127.
27. Rhodes, R.E., Smith, N.E.I., Personality correlates of physical activity: A review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine 40 (2006), 958–965, 10.1136/bjsm.2006.028860.
28. Roberts, B.W., Kuncel, N.R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., Goldberg, L.R., The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2 (2007), 313–345, 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x.
29. Schuurman, N.K., Houtveen, J.H., Hamaker, E.L., Incorporating measurement error in n = 1 psychological autoregressive modeling. Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, 2015, 1038, 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01038.
30. Sherman, R.A., Rauthmann, J.F., Brown, N.A., Serfass, D.G., Jones, A.B., The independent effects of personality and situations on real-time expressions of behavior and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 109 (2015), 878–888, 10.1037/pspp0000036.
31. Vainik, U., Mõttus, R., Allik, J., Esko, T., Realo, A., Are trait–outcome associations caused by scales or particular items? Example analysis of personality facets and BMI. European Journal of Personality 29 (2015), 622–634, 10.1002/per.2009.
32. van der Linden, D., te Nijenhuis, J., Bakker, A.B., The general factor of personality: A meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study. Journal of Research in Personality 44 (2010), 315–327, 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.03.003.
33. Wichers, M., Peeters, F., Rutten, B.P.F., Jacobs, N., Derom, C., Thiery, E.,. van Os, J., A time-lagged momentary assessment study on daily life physical activity and affect. Health Psychology 31 (2012), 135–144, 10.1037/a0025688.