Comparative study of Ni, Co, Cu supported on γ-alumina catalysts for hydrogen production via the glycerol steam reforming reaction

Fuel Processing Technology

Volumn 152, Issue , 2016, Pages 156-175

  Papageridis, Kiriakos N ^a   Siakavelas, Giorgos ^a,b   Charisiou, Nikolaos D ^a   Avraam, Dimitrios G ^a,c   Tzounis, Lazaros ^d   Kousi, Kaliopi ^e   Goula, Maria A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN MACEDONIA   (Greece)

^b HELLENIC OPEN UNIVERSITY   (Greece)

^c Region of Central Macedonia ^*  (Greece)

^d ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PATRAS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Alumina; Cobalt; Copper; Glycerol steam reforming; Hydrogen production; Nickel

Indexed keywords

ALUMINA; CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; CATALYSTS; CATALYTIC CRACKING; CATALYTIC REFORMING; COBALT; COPPER; GLYCEROL; HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; NICKEL; STEAM; SURFACE REACTIONS;

ACID-BASE PROPERTY; CATALYTIC PERFORMANCE; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; GLYCEROL CONVERSIONS; HYDROGEN SELECTIVITY; POLYMERIZATION REACTION; REACTION CONDITIONS; REACTION TEMPERATURE;

STEAM REFORMING;

EID: 84977559461     PISSN: 03783820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.06.024     Document Type: Article

References (179)

1. [1] Hook, M., Tang, X., Depletion of fossil fuels and anthropogenic climate change-a review. Energy Policy 52 (2013), 797–809, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.046.
2. [2] Mathews, A.P., Renewable energy technologies: panacea for world energy security and climate change. Proc. Comp. Sci. 32 (2014), 731–737, 10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.483.
3. [3] Pfenninger, S., Keirstead, J., Renewables, nuclear, or fossil fuels? Scenarios for Great Britain's power system considering costs, emissions and energy security. Appl. Energy 152 (2015), 83–93, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.102.
4. [4] Abas, N., Kalair, A., Khan, N., Review of fossil fuels and future energy technologies. Futures 69 (2015), 31–49, 10.1016/j.futures.2015.03.003.
5. [5] Charisiou, N.D., Goula, M.A., Attitudes of Greek university students towards energy and the environment. Glob. Nestle J. 16 (2014), 856–865.
6. [6] Azad, A.K., Rasul, M.G., Khan, M.M.K., Sharma, S.C., Hazrat, M.A., Prospect of biofuels as an alternative transport fuel in Australia. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 43 (2015), 331–351, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.047.
7. [7] Su, Y., Zhang, P., Su, Y., An overview of biofuels policies and industrialization in the major biofuel producing countries. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 50 (2015), 991–1003, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.032.
8. [8] Rincón, L.E., Jaramillo, J.J., Cardona, C.A., Comparison of feedstocks and technologies for biodiesel production: an environmental and techno-economic evaluation. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 69 (2014), 479–487, 10.1016/j.renene.2014.03.058.
9. [9] Guo, M., Song, W., Buhain, J., Bioenergy and biofuels: history, status, and perspective. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 42 (2015), 712–725, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.013.
10. [10] Nicoletti, G., Arcuri, N., Nicoletti, G., Bruno, R., A technical and environmental comparison between hydrogen and some fossil fuels. Energy Convers. Manag. 89 (2015), 205–213, 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.09.057.
11. [11] US Energy Information Administration (EIA), International Energy Statistics. http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/IEDIndex3.cfm, 2015 (accessed at 30/5/2015).
12. [12] Murphy, F., Devlin, G., Deverell, R., McDonnell, K., Potential to increase indigenous biodiesel production to help meet 2020 targets - an EU perspective with a focus on Ireland. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 35 (2014), 154–170, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.046.
13. [13] Yunus Khan, T.M., Atabani, A.E., Badruddina, I.A., Badarudina, A., Khayoon, M.S., Triwahyono, S., Recent scenario and technologies to utilize non-edible oils for biodiesel production. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 37 (2014), 840–851, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.064.
14. [14] Atadashi, I.M., Aroua, M.K., Abdul Aziz, A.R., Sulaiman, N.M.N., The effects of catalysts in biodiesel production: a review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 19 (2013), 14–26, 10.1016/j.jiec.2012.07.009.
15. [15] Wan Ghazali, W.N.M., Mamat, R., Masjuki, H.H., Najafi, G., Effects of biodiesel from different feedstocks on engine performance and emissions: a review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 51 (2015), 585–602, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.031.
16. 1H NMR. Fuel Process. Technol. 132 (2015), 99–104, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.12.016.
17. [17] Rastegari, H., Ghaziaskar, H.S., From glycerol as the by-product of biodiesel production to value-added monoacetin by continuous and selective esterification in acetic acid. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 21 (2015), 856–861, 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.04.023.
18. [18] Pudukudy, M., Yaakob, Z., Mohammad, M., Narayanan, B., Sopian, K., Renewable hydrogen economy in Asia - opportunities and challenges: an overview. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 30 (2015), 743–757, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.015.
19. [19] Silva, J.M., Soria, M.A., Madeira, L.M., Challenges and strategies for optimization of glycerol steam reforming process. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 42 (2015), 1187–1213, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.084.
20. [20] Adhikari, S., Fernando, S., Haryanto, A., Production of hydrogen by steam reforming of glycerin over alumina-supported metal catalysts. Catal. Today 129 (2007), 355–364, 10.1016/j.cattod.2006.09.038.
21. [21] Buffoni, I.N., Pompeo, F., Santori, G.F., Nichio, N.N., Nickel catalysts applied in steam reforming of glycerol for hydrogen production. Catal. Commun. 10 (2009), 1656–1660, 10.1016/j.catcom.2009.05.003.
22. 3 catalyst. Catal. Today 178 (2011), 25–33, 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.07.011.
23. 3 modified support and Ni and Pt active phases on glycerol steam reforming to produce hydrogen. Catal. Commun. 10 (2009), 1275–1278, 10.1016/j.catcom.2009.02.004.
24. [24] Wang, A., Dou, B., Chen, C., Song, Y., Xu, Y., Du, X., Zhang, L., Luo, T., Tan, C., Renewable hydrogen production from steam reforming of glycerol by Ni–Cu–Al, Ni–Cu–Mg, Ni–Mg catalysts. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 38 (2013), 3562–3571, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.042.
25. 2 adsorption. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 37 (2012), 14820–14830, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.158.
26. [26] Kamonsuangkasem, K., Therdthianwong, S., Therdthianwong, A., Hydrogen production from yellow glycerol via catalytic oxidative steam reforming. Fuel Process. Technol. 106 (2013), 695–703, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.10.003.
27. [27] Yang, G., Yu, H., Peng, F., Wang, H., Yang, J., Xie, D., Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen generation via oxidative steam reforming of glycerol. Renew. Energy 36 (2011), 2120–2127, 10.1016/j.renene.2011.01.022.
28. 3 for hydrogen production by oxidative steam reforming of glycerol. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 127 (2012), 89–98, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.08.003.
29. [29] Dauenhauer, P.J., Salge, J.R., Schmidt, L.D., Renewable hydrogen by autothermal steam reforming of volatile carbohydrates. J. Catal. 244 (2006), 238–247, 10.1016/j.jcat.2006.09.011.
30. [30] Wang, H., Wang, X., Li, M., Li, S., Wang, S., Ma, X., Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production from glycerol autothermal reforming. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 34 (2009), 5683–5690, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.118.
31. [31] Liu, Y., Lawal, A., Kinetic study of autothermal reforming of glycerol in a dual layer monolith catalyst. Chem. Eng. Process. 95 (2015), 276–283, 10.1016/j.cep.2012.06.012.
32. [32] Hajjaji, N., Baccar, I., Pons, M.N., Energy and exergy analysis as tools for optimization of hydrogen production by glycerol autothermal reforming. Renew. Energy 71 (2014), 368–380, 10.1016/j.renene.2014.05.056.
33. [33] Cortright, R.D., Davda, R.R., Dumesic, J.A., Hydrogen from catalytic reforming of biomass-derived hydrocarbons in liquid water. Nature 418 (2002), 964–967, 10.1038/nature01009.
34. 2. Fuel Process. Technol. 92 (2011), 330–335, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.09.024.
35. [35] Menezes, A.O., Rodrigues, M.T., Zimmaro, A., Borges, L.E.P., Fraga, M.A., Production of renewable hydrogen from aqueous-phase reforming of glycerol over Pt catalysts supported on different oxides. Renew. Energy 36 (2011), 595–599, 10.1016/j.renene.2010.08.004.
36. [36] Tuza, P.V., Manfro, R.L., Ribeiro, N.F.P., Souza, M.M.V.M., Production of renewable hydrogen by aqueous-phase reforming of glycerol over Ni–Cu catalysts derived from hydrotalcite precursors. Renew. Energy 50 (2013), 408–414, 10.1016/j.renene.2012.07.006.
37. 3 catalyst. Fuel 87 (2008), 2956–2960, 10.1016/j.fuel.2008.04.024.
38. [38] Gutiérrez Ortiz, F.J., Serrera, A., Galera, S., Ollero, P., Experimental study of the supercritical water reforming of glycerol without the addition of a catalyst. Energy 56 (2013), 193–206, 10.1016/j.energy.2013.04.046.
39. [39] Pairojpiriyakul, T., Croiset, E., Kiatkittipong, W., Kiatkittipong, K., Arpornwichanop, A., Assabumrungrat, S., Hydrogen production from catalytic supercritical water reforming of glycerol with cobalt-based catalysts. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 38 (2013), 4368–4379, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.169.
40. [40] Lin, Y.C., Catalytic valorization of glycerol to hydrogen and syngas. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 38 (2013), 2678–2700, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.079.
41. [41] Dou, B., Song, Y., Wang, C., Chen, H., Xu, Y., Hydrogen production from catalytic steam reforming of biodiesel byproduct glycerol: issues and challenges. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 30 (2014), 950–960, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.029.
42. 3 catalysts in the hydrogen production from glycerol steam reforming. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 39 (2014), 5704–5712, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.136.
43. 3 mixed oxides as catalyst precursors for glycerol steam reforming. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 147 (2014), 193–202, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.08.036.
44. [44] Chen, H., Ding, Y., Cong, N.T., Dou, B., Dupont, V., Ghadiri, M., Williams, P.T., A comparative study on hydrogen production from steam-glycerol reforming: thermodynamics and experimental. Renew. Energy 36 (2011), 779–788, 10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.026.
45. [45] Wang, X., Li, S., Wang, H., Liu, B., Ma, X., Thermodynamic analysis of glycerin steam reforming. Energy Fuel 22 (2008), 4285–4291, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.093.
46. [46] Adhikari, S., Fernando, S., Haryanto, A., A comparative thermodynamic and experimental analysis on hydrogen production by steam reforming of glycerin. Energy Fuel 21 (2007), 2306–2310, 10.1021/ef070035l.
47. [47] Rossi, C.C.R.S., Alsonso, C.G., Antunes, O.A.C., Guirardello, R., Cardozo-Filho, L., Thermodynamic analysis of steam reforming of ethanol and glycerine for hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 34 (2009), 323–332, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.071.
48. [48] Adhikari, S., Fernando, S., Gwaltney, S.R., S.D. Filip To, Bricka, R.M., Steele, P.H., Haryanto, A., A thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production by steam reforming of glycerol. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 32 (2007), 2875–2880, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.093.
49. [49] Sad, M.E., Duarte, H.A., Vignatti, C.H., Padro, C.L., Apesteguıa, C.R., Steam reforming of glycerol: hydrogen production optimization. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 40 (2015), 6097–6106, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.043.
50. [50] Freitas, A.C.D., Guirardello, R., Comparison of several glycerol reforming methods for hydrogen and syngas production using Gibbs energy minimization. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 39 (2014), 17969–17984, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.130.
51. 2 catalysts. Catal. Today 172 (2011), 183–188, 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.05.001.
52. [52] de Rezende, S.M., Franchini, C.A., Dieuzeide, M.L., de Farias, A.M.D., Amadeo, N., Fraga, M.A., Glycerol steam reforming over layered double hydroxide-supported Pt catalysts. Chem. Eng. J. 272 (2015), 108–118, 10.1016/j.cej.2015.03.033.
53. [53] Wei, Z., Karim, A.M., Li, Y., King, D.L., Wang, Y., Elucidation of the roles of Re in steam reforming of glycerol over Pt-Re/C catalysts. J. Catal. 322 (2015), 49–59, 10.1016/j.jcat.2014.11.006.
54. [54] Pompeo, F., Santori, G., Nichio, N.N., Hydrogen and/or syngas from steam reforming of glycerol. Study of platinum catalysts. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 35 (2010), 8912–8920, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.06.011.
55. [55] Soares, R.R., Simonetti, D.A., Dumesic, J.A., Glycerol as a source for fuels and chemicals by low-temperature catalytic processing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45 (2006), 3982–3985, 10.1002/anie.200600212.
56. [56] Gallo, A., Pirovano, C., Ferrini, P., Marelli, M., Psaro, R., Santangelo, S., Faggio, G., Dal Santo, V., Influence of reaction parameters on the activity of ruthenium based catalysts for glycerol steam reforming. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 121-122 (2012), 40–49, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.03.013.
57. [57] Kim, J., Lee, D., Glycerol steam reforming on supported Ru-based catalysts for hydrogen production for fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 38 (2013), 11853–11862, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.141.
58. [58] Hirai, T., Ikenaga, N.O., Miyake, T., Suzuki, T., Production of hydrogen by steam reforming of glycerin on ruthenium catalyst. Energy Fuel 19 (2005), 1761–1762, 10.1021/ef050121q.
59. [59] Chiodo, V., Freni, S., Galvagno, A., Mondello, N., Frusteri, F., Catalytic features of Rh and Ni supported catalysts in the steam reforming of glycerol to produce hydrogen. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 381 (2010), 1–7, 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.03.039.
60. [60] Zhang, B., Tang, X., Li, Y., Xu, Y., She, W., Hydrogen production from steam reforming of ethanol and glycerol over ceria-supported metal catalysts. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 32 (2007), 2367–2373, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.11.003.
61. 3 catalysts promoted by noble metals. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 34 (2009), 5049–5060, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.03.050.
62. [62] Araque, M., Martínez, T.L.M., Vargas, J.C., Roger, A.C., Hydrogen production by glycerol steam reforming over CeZrCo fluorite type oxides. Catal. Today 176 (2011), 352–356, 10.1016/j.cattod.2010.11.066.
63. [63] Martínez, T.L.M., Araque, M., Vargas, J.C., Roger, A.C., Effect of Ce/Zr ratio in CeZr–CoRh catalysts on the hydrogen production by glycerol steam reforming. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 132–133 (2013), 499–510, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.12.027.
64. 2 production in glycerol steam reforming. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 125 (2012), 556–566, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.06.028.
65. 2 used to catalyze glycerol steam reforming. Fuel 105 (2013), 358–363, 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.06.105.
66. [66] Adhikari, S., Fernando, S., Haryanto, A., Hydrogen production from glycerin by steam reforming over nickel catalysts. Renew. Energy 33 (2008), 1097–1100, 10.1016/j.renene.2007.09.005.
67. [67] Dave, C.D., Pant, K.K., Renewable hydrogen generation by steam reforming of glycerol over zirconia promoted ceria supported catalyst. Renew. Energy 36 (2011), 3195–3202, 10.1016/j.renene.2011.03.013.
68. 3 catalysts, modified with Mg (II). Effect of Mg (II) content. Catal. Today 213 (2013), 50–57, 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.02.015.
69. [69] Ebshish, A., Yaakob, Z., Narayanan, B., Bshish, A., Daud, W.R.W., Steam reforming of glycerol over Ni supported alumina xerogel for hydrogen production. Energy Procedia 19 (2012), 552–559, 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.05.067.
70. [70] Gallegos-Suárez, E., Guerrero-Ruiz, A., Fernández-García, M., Rodríguez-Ramos, I., Kubacka, A., Efficient and stable Ni-Ce glycerol reforming catalysts: chemical imaging using X-ray electron and scanning transmission microscopy. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 165 (2015), 139–148, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.10.007.
71. 2 from glycerol. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 37 (2012), 7084–7093, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.11.075.
72. [72] Nichele, V., Signoretto, M., Menegazzo, F., Gallo, A., Santo, V.D., Cruciani, G., Cerrato, G., Glycerol steam reforming for hydrogen production: design of Ni supported catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 111–112 (2012), 225–232, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.10.003.
73. [73] Sanchez, E.A., Comelli, R.A., Hydrogen by glycerol steam reforming on a nickel–alumina catalyst: deactivation processes and regeneration. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 37 (2012), 14740–14746, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.12.088.
74. [74] Sanchez, E.A., Comelli, R.A., Hydrogen production by glycerol steam-reforming over nickel and nickel–cobalt impregnated on alumina. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 39 (2014), 8650–8655, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.067.
75. [75] Shao, S., Shi, A.W., Liu, C.L., Yang, R.Z., Dong, W.S., Hydrogen production from steam reforming of glycerol over Ni/CeZrO catalysts. Fuel Process. Technol. 125 (2014), 1–7, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.03.022.
76. 3 catalysts: influence of the support, reaction parameters and deactivation/ regeneration processes. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 492 (2015), 38–47, 10.1016/j.apcata.2014.12.029.
77. [77] Dou, B., Wang, C., Song, Y., Chen, H., Xu, Y., Activity of Ni–Cu–Al based catalyst for renewable hydrogen production from steam reforming of glycerol. Energy Convers. Manag. 78 (2014), 253–259, 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.10.067.
78. 3 catalysts studied by various transient techniques. J. Catal. 161 (1996), 626–640, 10.1006/jcat.1996.0225.
79. 2 catalyst prepared by precipitation deposition method. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 28 (2011), 1859–1866, 10.1007/s11814-011-0059-8.
80. [80] Iriondo, A., Barrio, V.L., Cambra, J.F., Arias, P.L., Güemez, M.B., Sanchez-Sanchez, M.C., Navarro, R.M., Fierro, J.L.G., Glycerol steam reforming over Ni catalysts supported on ceria and ceria-promoted alumina. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 35 (2010), 11622–11633, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.105.
81. 3 catalysts. Effect of calcination temperatures. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 37 (2012), 14926–14930, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.12.086.
82. [82] Go, Y.J., Go, G.S., Lee, H.J., Moon, D.J., Park, N.C., Kim, Y.C., The relation between carbon deposition and hydrogen production in glycerol steam reforming. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 40 (2015), 11840–11847, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.100.
83. [83] Ramesh, S., Yang, E.H., Jung, J.S., Moon, D.J., Copper decorated perovskite an efficient catalyst for low temperature hydrogen production by steam reforming of glycerol. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2015, 11428–11435, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.02.013.
84. [84] Wang, C., Dou, B., Chen, H., Song, Y., Xu, Y., Du, X., Luo, T., Tan, C., Hydrogen production from steam reforming of glycerol by Ni–Mg–Al based catalysts in a fixed-bed reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 220 (2013), 133–142, 10.1016/j.cej.2013.01.050.
85. [85] Huang, Z.Y., Xu, C.H., Meng, J., Zheng, C.F., Xiao, H.W., Chen, J., Zhang, Y.X., Glycerol steam reforming to syngas over Ni-based catalysts on commercial Linde-type 5A zeolite modified by metal oxides. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2 (2014), 598–604, 10.1016/j.jece.2013.10.015.
86. [86] Adhikari, S., Fernando, S.D., S.D.F. To, Bricka, R.M., Steele, R.H., Haryanto, A., Conversion of glycerol to hydrogen via a steam reforming process over nickel catalysts. Energy Fuel 22 (2008), 1220–1226, 10.1021/ef700520f.
87. 3 catalysts effect of Ni(II) content. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 39 (2014), 16976–16982, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.08.097.
88. [88] Kim, S.H., Jung, J.S., Yang, E.H., Lee, K.Y., Moon, D.J., Hydrogen production by steam reforming of biomass-derived glycerol over Ni-based catalysts. Catal. Today 228 (2014), 145–151, 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.11.043.
89. [89] Wu, G., Li, S., Zhang, C., Wang, T., Gong, J., Glycerol steam reforming over perovskite-derived nickel-based catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 144 (2014), 277–285, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.07.028.
90. [90] Calles, J.A., Carrero, A., Vizcaíno, A.J., García-Moreno, L., Hydrogen production by glycerol steam reforming over SBA-15-supported nickel catalysts: effect of alkaline earth promoters on activity and stability. Catal. Today 227 (2014), 198–206, 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.11.006.
91. 3 catalyst during steam reforming of glycerol. Catal. Today 164 (2011), 268–274, 10.1016/j.cattod.2010.10.040.
92. [92] Schwengber, A.A., Alves, H.J., Schaffner, R.A., da Silva, F.A., Sequinel, R., Bach, V.R., Ferracin, R.J., Overview of glycerol reforming for hydrogen production. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 58 (2016), 259–266, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.279.
93. 3 modified by Mg, Zr, Ce or La. Top. Catal. 49 (2008), 46–58, 10.1007/s11244-008-9060-9.
94. 3 catalyst. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 35 (2010), 5902–5907, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.115.
95. 3 catalyst via glycerol steam reforming. Catal. Commun. 12 (2010), 292–298, 10.1016/j.catcom.2010.09.018.
96. [96] Goula, M.A., Charisiou, N.D., Papageridis, K.N., Delimitis, A., Pachatouridou, E., Iliopoulou, E.F., Nickel on alumina catalysts for the production of hydrogen rich mixtures via the biogas dry reforming reaction: influence of the synthesis method. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 40 (2015), 9183–9200, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.129.
97. [97] Goula, M.A., Bereketidou, O.A., Papageridis, K.N., Charisiou, N.D., Influence of the preparation procedure parameters on the performance of Ni/γ-alumina catalysts for the biogas reforming reaction. Proc. Int. Conf. WHEC, 1435–1441, 2014.
98. [98] Lemonidou, A.A., Goula, M.A., Vasalos, I.A., Carbon dioxide reforming of methane over 5 wt% nickel calcium aluminate catalysts - effect of preparation method. Catal. Today 46 (1998), 175–183, 10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00339-3.
99. [99] Ni, M., Leung, D.Y.C., Leung, M.K.H., A review on reforming bio-ethanol for hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 32 (2007), 3238–3247, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.038.
100. 2 xerogel supports. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 34 (2009), 3755–3763, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.03.030.
101. [101] Kordouli, E., Dracopoulos, V., Vaimakis, T., Bourikas, K., Lycourghiotis, A., Kordulis, C., Comparative study of phase transition and textural changes upon calcination of two commercial titania samples: a pure anatase and a mixed anatase-rutile. J. Solid State Chem. 232 (2015), 42–49, 10.1016/j.jssc.2015.08.040.
102. 3 catalysts. Appl. Catal. B 145 (2014), 136–148, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.11.043.
103. 2O. Appl. Catal. B 192 (2016), 357–364, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.04.011.
104. [104] Kousi, K., Chourdakis, N., Matralis, H., Kondarides, D., Papadopoulou, C., Verykios, X., Glycerol steam reforming over modified Ni-based catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 518 (2016), 129–141, 10.1016/j.apcata.2015.11.047.
105. 3 alumina catalysts. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 31 (2016), 164–183, 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.02.021.
106. [106] Bereketidou, O.A., Goula, M.A., Biogas reforming for syngas production over nickel supported on ceria-alumina catalysts. Catal. Today 195 (2012), 93–100, 10.1016/j.cattod.2012.07.006.
107. [107] Zhou, W.J., Zhou, B., Li, W.Z., Zhou, Z.H., Song, S.Q., Sun, G.Q., Xin, Q., Douvartzides, S., Goula, M., Tsiakaras, P., Performance comparison of low-temperature direct alcohol fuel cells with different anode catalysts. J. Power Sources 126 (2004), 16–22, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.08.009.
108. 3 catalysts for various methane reforming reactions. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 158–159 (2014), 190–201, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.04.014.
109. [109] Jiménez-González, C., Boukha, Z., de Rivas, B., Delgado, J.J., Cauqui, M.A., González-Velasco, J.R., Gutiérrez-Ortiz, J.I., López-Fonseca, R., Structural characterisation of Ni/alumina reforming catalysts activated at high temperatures. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 466 (2013), 9–20, 10.1016/j.apcata.2013.06.017.
110. [110] Li, G., Hu, L., Hill, J.M., Comparison of reducibility and stability of alumina-supported Ni catalysts prepared by impregnation and co-precipitation. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 301 (2006), 16–24, 10.1016/j.apcata.2005.11.013.
111. 3 catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 251 (2003), 275–283, 10.1016/S0926-860X(03)00359-4.
112. [112] Kim, P., Kim, Y., Kim, H., Song, I.K., Yi, K., Synthesis and characterization of mesoporous alumina with nickel incorporated for use in the partial oxidation of methane into synthesis gas. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 272 (2004), 157–166, 10.1016/j.apcata.2004.05.055.
113. [113] Oliveira, H.A., Franceschini, D.F., Passos, F.B., Cobalt catalyst characterization for methane decomposition and carbon nanotube growth. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 25 (2014), 2339–2349, 10.5935/0103-5053.20140243.
114. [114] Jongsomjit, B., Panpranot, J., Goodwin, J.G. Jr., Co-support compound formation in alumina-supported cobalt catalysts. J. Catal. 204 (2001), 98–109, 10.1006/jcat.2001.3387.
115. [115] Llorca, J., Dalmon, J.A., de la Piscina, P.R., Homs, N., In situ magnetic characterisation of supported cobalt catalysts under steam reforming of ethanol. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 243 (2003), 261–269, 10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00546-X.
116. 4 during ethanol steam-re-forming. Activation process for hydrogen production. Chem. Mater. 16 (2004), 3573–3578, 10.1021/cm049311p.
117. 3: an investigation of structure–activity relationships. Catal. Today 131 (2008), 305–313, 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.10.024.
118. 2. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 355 (2011), 464–471, 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.11.076.
119. [119] Derrien, G., Charnay, C., Zajac, J., Jones, D.J., Rozière, J., Copper-containing monodisperse mesoporous silica nanospheres by a smart one-step approach. Chem. Commun., 2008, 3118–3120, 10.1039/B804593C.
120. 3. Catal. Today 250 (2015), 209–217, 10.1016/j.cat.2014.07.014.
121. 3 catalysts: surface Ni species-catalytic activity correlation. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 368 (2009), 105–112, 10.1016/j.apcata.2009.08.021.
122. [122] Rosenir, R.C.M.S., Hugo, A.O., Guarino, C.P.F.A., Toledo, B.B., Moura, M.B.T., Oliveira, B.T.M., Passos, F.B., Effect of support on methane decomposition for hydrogen production over cobalt catalysts. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 41 (2016), 6763–6772, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.02.101.
123. [123] Storsaeter, S., Totdal, B., Walmsley, J.C., Tanem, B.S., Holmen, A., Characterization of alumina-, silica-, and titania-supported cobalt Fischer-Tropsch catalysts. J. Catal. 236 (2005), 139–236, 10.1016/j.cat.2005.09.021.
124. [124] Dow, W.P., Wang, Y.P., Huang, T.J., TPR and XRD studies of yttria-doped ceria/alumina-supported copper oxide catalyst. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 190 (2000), 25–34, 10.1016/S0926-860X(99)00286-0.
125. [125] Patel, A., Shukl, P., Chen, J., Rufford, T.E., Wang, S., Rudolph, V., Zhu, Z., Structural sensitivity of mesoporous alumina for copper catalyst loading used for NO reduction in presence of CO. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 101 (2015), 27–43, 10.1016/j.cherd.2015.03.027.
126. 2. Catal. Lett. 91 (2003), 73–81, 10.1023/B:CATL.0000006320.85524.f1.
127. 2 or CO atmospheres. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 89 (1993), 1257–1262, 10.1039/FT9938901257.
128. 3 catalyst. App. Catal. B Environ. 49 (2004), 135–144, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.12.001.
129. 3 catalyst for fuel cell utilization. Ionics 9 (2003), 248–252, 10.1007/BF02375975.
130. [130] Wang, X., Li, M., Li, S., Wang, H., Wang, S., Ma, X., Hydrogen production by glycerol steam reforming with/without calcium oxide sorbent: a comparative study of thermodynamic and experimental work. Fuel Process. Technol. 91 (2010), 1812–1818, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.08.003.
131. [131] Dou, B.L., Dupont, V., Williams, P.T., Chen, H.S., Ding, Y.L., Thermogravimetric kinetics of crude glycerol. Bioresour. Technol. 100 (2009), 2613–2620, 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.037.
132. 3: influence of nickel precursors. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 1 (2013), 1052–1062, 10.1021/sc400123f.
133. 2 production for MC fuel cell by steam reforming of ethanol over MgO supported Pd, Rh, Ni and Co catalysts. Catal. Commun. 5 (2004), 611–615, 10.1016/j.catcom.2004.07.015.
134. [134] Llorca, J., Homs, N., Sales, J., Fierro, J.L.G., de la Piscina, P.R., Effect of sodium addition on the performance of Co–ZnO-based catalysts for hydrogen production from bioethanol. J. Catal. 222 (2004), 470–480, 10.1016/j.jcat.2003.12.008.
135. [135] Batista, M.S., Santos, R.K.S., Assaf, E.M., Assaf, J.M., Ticianelli, E.A., High efficiency steam reforming of ethanol by cobalt-based catalysts. J. Power Sources 134 (2004), 27–32, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.01.052.
136. 3. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49 (2010), 10804–10817, 10.1021/ie100462t.
137. [137] Casanovas, A., Roig, M., de Leitenburg, C., Trovatelli, A., Llorca, J., Ethanol steam reforming and water gas shift over Co/ZnO catalytic honeycombs doped with Fe, Ni, Cu, Cr and Na. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 35 (2010), 7690–7698, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.099.
138. 2 catalysts for ethanol steam reforming. Chem. Eng. J. 163 (2010), 395–402, 10.1016/j.cej.2010.07.029.
139. 3 supported catalysts for ethanol steam reforming: formation of hydrotalcite-type compounds as a result of metal-support interaction. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 238 (2003), 41–54, 10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00113-8.
140. [140] Wang, F., Li, Y., Cai, W., Zhan, E., Mu, X., Shen, W., Ethanol steam reforming over Ni and Ni–Cu catalysts. Catal. Today 146 (2009), 31–36, 10.1016/j.apcata.2007.04.030.
141. 2 catalysts: effect of Cu/Ni ratio. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 106 (2011), 639–649, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.06.028.
142. [142] Finocchio, E., Rossetti, I., Ramis, G., Redox properties of Co- and Cu-based catalysts for the steam reforming of ethanol. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 38 (2013), 3213–3225, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.137.
143. [143] Miranda, B.C., Chimentão, R.J., Szanyi, J., Braga, A.H., Santos, J.B.O., Gispert-Guirado, F., Llorca, J., Medina, F., Influence of copper on nickel-based catalysts in the conversion of glycerol. App. Catal. B Environ. 166-167 (2015), 166–180, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.11.019.
144. 3 catalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 147 (2014), 464–480, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.09.026.
145. [145] Sato, S., Akiyama, M., Takahashi, R., Hara, T., Inui, K., Yokota, M., Vapor-phase reaction of polyols over copper catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 347 (2008), 186–191, 10.1016/j.apcata.2008.06.013.
146. 3 catalyst. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 33 (2008), 6627–6634, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.07.064.
147. 2 production for MCFC. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 249 (2003), 119–128, 10.1016/S0926-860X(03)00189-3.
148. [148] Bartholomew, C.H., Carbon deposition in steam reforming and methanation. Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 24 (1982), 67–112, 10.1080/03602458208079650.
149. [149] Dou, B., Dupont, V., Rickett, G., Blakeman, N., Williams, P., Chen, H., Hydrogen production by sorption-enhanced steam reforming of glycerol. Bioresour. Technol. 100 (2009), 3540–3547, 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.036.
150. [150] Adhikari, S., Fernando, S.D., Haryanto, A., Hydrogen production from glycerol: an update. Energy Convers. Manag. 50 (2009), 2600–2604, 10.1016/j.enconman.2009.06.011.
151. 3. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 175 (2010), 449–452, 10.1016/S0167-2991(10)75082-5.
152. [152] Corma, A., Huber, G.H., Sauvanaud, L., O'Connor, P., Biomass to chemicals: catalytic conversion of glycerol/water mixtures into acrolein, reaction network. J. Catal. 257 (2008), 163–171, 10.1016/j.jcat.2008.04.016.
153. [153] Paine, J.B. III, Pithawalla, Y.B., Naworal, J.D., Thomas, C.E. Jr., Carbohydrate pyrolysis mechanisms from isotopic labeling: part 1: the pyrolysis of glycerin: discovery of competing fragmentation mechanisms affording acetaldehyde and formaldehyde and the implications for carbohydrate pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 80 (2007), 297–311, 10.1016/j.jaap.2007.03.007.
154. [154] Buhler, W., Dinjus, E., Ederer, H.J., Kruse, A., Mas, C., Ionic reactions and pyrolysis of glycerol as competing reaction pathways in near- and supercritical water. J. Supercrit. Fluids 22 (2002), 37–53, 10.1016/S0896-8446(01)00105-X.
155. 5 catalyst. J. Catal. 250 (2007), 342–349, 10.1016/j.jcat.2007.06.016.
156. [156] Suprun, W., Lutecki, M., Haber, T., Papp, H., Acidic catalysts for the dehydration of glycerol: activity and deactivation. J. Mol. Catal. A 309 (2009), 71–78, 10.1016/j.molcata.2009.04.017.
157. [157] Barrault, J., Clacens, J.M., Pouilloux, Y., Selective oligomerization of glycerol over mesoporous catalysts. Top. Catal. 27 (2004), 137–142, 10.1023/B:TOCA.0000013548.16699.1c.
158. [158] Katryniok, B., Paul, S., Bellière-Baca, V., Rey, P., Dumeignil, F., Glycerol dehydration to acrolein in the context of new uses of glycerol. Green Chem. 12 (2010), 2079–2098, 10.1039/C0GC00307G.
159. 3. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 467 (2013), 315–324.
160. [160] Stosic, D., Bennici, S., Sirotin, S., Calais, C., Couturier, J.L., Dubois, J.L., Travert, A., Auroux, A., Glycerol dehydration over calcium phosphate catalysts: effect of acidic-basic features on catalytic performance. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 447-448 (2012), 124–134, 10.1016/j.apcata.2012.09.029.
161. [161] Tsukuda, E., Sato, S., Takahashi, R., Sodesawa, T., Production of acrolein from glycerol over silica-supported heteropoly acids. Catal. Commun. 8 (2007), 1349–1353, 10.1016/j.catcom.2006.12.006.
162. [162] Pathak, K., Reddy, K.M., Bakhshi, N.N., Dalai, A.K., Catalytic conversion of glycerol to value added liquid products. Appl. Catal. A 372 (2010), 224–238, 10.1016/j.apcata.2009.10.036.
163. [163] Van Damme, P.S., Narayanan, S., Froment, G.F., Thermal cracking of propane and propane-propylene mixtures: pilot plant versus industrial data. AICHE J. 21 (1975), 1065–1073, 10.1002/aic.690210604.
164. [164] Shah, Y.T., Stuart, E.B., Sheth, K.D., Coke formation during thermal cracking of n-octane. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process. Des. Dev., 15, 1976, 518, 10.1021/i260060a007.
165. [165] Sundaram, K.M., Froment, G.F., Kinetics of coke deposition in the thermal cracking of propane. Chem. Eng. Sci. 34 (1979), 635–644, 10.1016/0009-2509(79)85108-8.
166. [166] Bartholomew, C.H., Strasburg, M.V., Hsieh, H.Y., Effects of support on carbon formation and gasification on nickel during carbon monoxide hydrogenation. Appl. Catal., 36, 1988, 147, 10.1016/S0166-9834(00)80111-6.
167. 3 catalyst: transient kinetic modelling of propene and coke formation. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 248 (2003), 105–116, 10.1016/S0926-860X(03)00128-5.
168. [168] Fatsikostas, A.N., Kondarides, D.I., Verykios, X.E., Production of hydrogen for fuel cells by reformation of biomass-derived ethanol. Catal. Today 75 (2002), 145–155, 10.1016/S0920-5861(02)00057-3.
169. 2 catalysts: a comparative study of steam reforming, partial oxidation and oxidative steam reforming. J. Catal. 257 (2008), 96–107, 10.1016/j.jcat.2008.04.009.
170. 3 catalyst in comparison to the thermodynamic reaction equilibrium. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 90 (2009), 29–37, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.02.006.
171. 2: effect of metal and support on reaction mechanism. Top. Catal. 51 (2008), 22–38, 10.1007/s11244-008-9122-z.
172. 2 catalysts: catalytic behavior and deactivation/regeneration processes. J. Catal. 257 (2008), 206–214, 10.1016/j.jcat.2008.05.001.
173. 2. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 34 (2009), 2224–2234, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.12.058.
174. [174] Wen, G., Xu, Y., Ma, H., Xu, Z., Tian, Z., Production of hydrogen by aqueous-phase reforming of glycerol. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 33 (2008), 6657–6666, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.07.072.
175. [175] Bayram, B., Soykal, I.I., von Deak, D., Miller, J.T., Ozkan, U.S., Ethanol steam reforming over Co-based catalysts: investigation of cobalt coordination environment under reaction conditions. J. Catal. 284 (2011), 77–89, 10.1016/j.jcat.2011.09.001.
176. [176] Moodley, D.J., Saib, A.M., Loosdrecht, J.V.D., Welker-Nieuwoudt, C.A., Sigwe-bela, B.H., Niemantsverdriet, J.W., The impact of cobalt aluminate formation on the deactivation of cobalt-based Fischer-Tropsch synthesis catalysts. Catal. Today 171 (2011), 192–200, 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.03.078.
177. [177] Passos, A.R., Martins, L., Pulcinelli, S.H., Santilli, C.V., Briois, V., Effect of the balance between Co(II) and Co(0) oxidation states on the catalytic activity of cobalt catalysts for ethanol steam reforming. Catal. Today 229 (2014), 88–94, 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.10.080.
178. [178] Corma, A., Miguel, P.J., Orchilles, A.V., Catal, J., The role of reaction temperature and cracking catalyst characteristics in determining the relative rates of protolytic cracking, chain propagation, and hydrogen transfer. J. Catal. 145 (1994), 171–180, 10.1006/jcat.1994.1020.
179. [179] Frusteri, F., Freni, S., Chiodo, V., Spadaro, L., di Blasi, O., Bonura, G., Steam reforming of bio-ethanol on alkali-doped Ni/MgO catalysts: hydrogen production for MC fuel cell. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 270 (2004), 1–7, 10.1016/j.apcata.2004.03.052.