GenoMatrix: A Software Package for Pedigree-Based and Genomic Prediction Analyses on Complex Traits

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 107, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 372-379

  Nazarian, Alireza ^a   Gezan, Salvador Alejandro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Complex traits; G BLUP analysis; Genome wide marker data; P BLUP analysis; Software

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENETIC TRAIT; GENOMATRIX; GENOMICS; HUMAN; PARENTHOOD; PEDIGREE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; PROCEDURES; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; SOFTWARE; WEB BROWSER;

ALGORITHMS; GENOMICS; MODELS, GENETIC; PEDIGREE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SOFTWARE; WEB BROWSER;

EID: 84977112023     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: 14657333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esw020     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson DL, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Lawlor TJ. 2010. Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. J Dairy Sci. 93:743-752.
2. Antia HM. 2002. Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. Birkhäuser Verlag.
3. Beaulieu J, Doerksen TK, MacKay J, Rainville A, Bousquet J. 2014. Genomic selection accuracies within and between environments and small breeding groups in white spruce. BMC Genomics. 15:1048.
4. Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES. 2007. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics. 23:2633-2635.
5. Butler DG, Cullis BR, Gilmour AR and Gogel B. 2007. ASReml-R Reference Manual Release 2. 0, Release 2. 00. Brisbane: The State of Queensland, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries.
6. Cantor RM, Lange K, Sinsheimer JS. 2010. Prioritizing GWAS results: A review of statistical methods and recommendations for their application. Am J Hum Genet. 86:6-22.
7. Christensen OF, Lund MS. 2010. Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped. Genet Sel Evol GSE. 42:2.
8. Davis C. 1962. The norm of the Schur product operation. Numer Math. 4:343-344.
9. de Los Campos G, Vazquez AI, Fernando R, Klimentidis YC, Sorensen D. 2013. Prediction of complex human traits using the genomic best linear unbiased predictor. PLoS Genet. 9:e1003608.
10. Eaton ML. 1983. Multivariate statistics: A vector space approach, 1st ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
11. Endelman JB. 2011. Ridge regression and other kernels for genomic selection with R Package rrBLUP. Plant Genome. 4:250-255.
12. Endelman JB, Jannink J-L. 2012. Shrinkage estimation of the realized relationship matrix. G3 Bethesda Md. 2:1405-1413.
13. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4 edn. Essex (UK): Longman Group Ltd.
14. Gengler N, Mayeres P, Szydlowski M. 2007. A simple method to approximate gene content in large pedigree populations: Application to the myostatin gene in dual-purpose Belgian Blue cattle. Anim Int J Anim Biosci. 1:21-28.
15. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Welham SJ and Thompson R. 2015. ASReml User Guide Release 4. 1 Functional Specifcation, Release 4. 1. Hempstead (UK): VSN International Ltd.
16. Goddard M. 2009. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica. 136:245-257.
17. Grattapaglia D and Resende MDV. 2011. Genomic selection in forest tree breeding. Tree Genet Genomes. 7:241-255.
18. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JC. 2007. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics. 177:2389-2397.
19. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME. 2009a. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. J Dairy Sci. 92:433-443.
20. Hayes BJ, Visscher PM, Goddard ME. 2009b. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet Res (Camb). 91:47-60.
21. Henderson CR. 1963. Selection index and expected genetic advance. Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. In: Hanson WD, Robinson HF, editors. National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, Washington, p. 141-163
22. Henderson CR. 1984. Applications of linear models in animal breeding.
23. Guelph: University of Guelph. Henderson CR. 1975. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics. 31:423-447.
24. Henderson CR. 1976. A simple method for computing the inverse of a numerator relationship matrix used in prediction of breeding values. Biometrics. 32:69-83.
25. Jorjani H, Klei L, Emanuelson U. 2003. A simple method for weighted bending of genetic (co)variance matrices. J Dairy Sci. 86:677-679.
26. Lee SH, Goddard ME, Visscher PM, van der Werf JH. 2010. Using the realized relationship matrix to disentangle confounding factors for the estimation of genetic variance components of complex traits. Genet Sel Evol. 42:22.
27. Lee SH, van der Werf JHJ, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. 2008. Predicting unobserved phenotypes for complex traits from whole-genome SNP data. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000231.
28. Liu S, Trenkler G. 2008. Hadamard, Khatri-Rao, Kronecker and other matrix products. Int J Inf Syst Sci. 4:160-177.
29. Meuwissen TH, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. 2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 157:1819-1829.
30. Meuwissen TH and Goddard ME. 1999. Marker assisted estimation of breeding values when marker information is missing on many animals. Genet Sel Evol. 31:375.
31. Meyer K. 2007. WOMBAT: A tool for mixed model analyses in quantitative genetics by restricted maximum likelihood (REML). J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 8:815-821.
32. Moore JH, Asselbergs FW, Williams SM. 2010. Bioinformatics challenges for genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics. 26:445-455.
33. Mrode RA. 1996. Linear models for the prediction of animal breeding values, 1st ed. Wallingford (UK): CABI.
34. Muñoz PR, Resende MF Jr, Gezan SA, Resende MD, de Los Campos G, Kirst M, Huber D, Peter GF. 2014. Unraveling additive from nonadditive effects using genomic relationship matrices. Genetics. 198:1759-1768.
35. Nazarian A, Gezan SA. 2016. Integrating nonadditive genomic relationship matrices into the study of genetic architecture of complex traits. J Hered. 107:153-162.
36. Poland J, Endelman J, Dawson J, Rutkoski J, Wu S, Manes Y, Dreisigacker S, Crossa J, Sánchez-Villeda H, Sorrells M et al. 2012. Genomic selection in wheat breeding using genotyping-by-sequencing. Plant Genome. 5:103-113.
37. Powell JE, Visscher PM, Goddard ME. 2010. Reconciling the analysis of IBD and IBS in complex trait studies. Nat Rev Genet. 11:800-805.
38. Ridge PG, Mukherjee S, Crane PK, Kauwe JS; Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium. 2013. Alzheimer's disease: Analyzing the missing heritability. PLoS One. 8:e79771.
39. Rodríguez-Ramilo ST, García-Cortés LA, González-Recio O. 2014. Combining genomic and genealogical information in a reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces regression model for genome-enabled predictions in dairy cattle. PLoS One. 9:e93424.
40. Schaeffer LR. 2010a. Linear models and animal breeding. Guelph (ON): Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph.
41. Schaeffer LR. 2010b. Modification of negative eigenvalues to create positive definite matrices and approximation of standard errors of correlation estimates. Guelph (ON): Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph.
42. Schaeffer LR, Kennedy BW, Gibson JP. 1989. The inverse of the gametic relationship matrix. J Dairy Sci. 72:1266-1272.
43. Simeone R, Misztal I, Aguilar I, Legarra A. 2011. Evaluation of the utility of diagonal elements of the genomic relationship matrix as a diagnostic tool to detect mislabelled genotyped animals in a broiler chicken population. J Anim Breed Genet Z Für Tierz Zücht. 128:386-393.
44. Su G, Christensen OF, Ostersen T, Henryon M, Lund MS. 2012. Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers. PLoS One. 7:e45293.
45. Tenesa A, Haley CS. 2013. The heritability of human disease: estimation, uses and abuses. Nat Rev Genet. 14:139-149.
46. The MathWorks, Inc. 2015. MATLAB and Statistics Toolbox Release 2015b. Natick (MA): The MathWorks, Inc.
47. VanRaden PM. 2008. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci. 91:4414-4423.
48. VanRaden PM. 2007. Genomic measures of relationship and inbreeding. Interbull Bull. 37:33-36.
49. VanRaden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Schenkel FS. 2009. Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J Dairy Sci. 92:16-24.
50. Vitezica ZG, Varona L, Legarra A. 2013. On the additive and dominant variance and covariance of individuals within the genomic selection scope. Genetics. 195:1223-1230.
51. Wilson AJ, Réale D, Clements MN, Morrissey MM, Postma E, Walling CA, Kruuk LE, Nussey DH. 2010. An ecologist's guide to the animal model. J Anim Ecol. 79:13-26.
52. Wolak ME. 2012. nadiv : An R package to create relatedness matrices for estimating non-additive genetic variances in animal models. Methods Ecol Evol. 3:792-796.
53. Yang J, Benyamin B, McEvoy BP, Gordon S, Henders AK, Nyholt DR, Madden PA, Heath AC, Martin NG, Montgomery GW, et al. 2010. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat Genet. 42:565-569.
54. Yang J, Lee SH, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. 2011. GCTA: A tool for genomewide complex trait analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 88:76-82.
55. Ziegler A, König IR and Thompson JR. 2008. Biostatistical aspects of genomewide association studies. Biom J Biom Z. 50:8-28.