A patient-centered approach to informed consent: Results from a survey and randomized trial

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 726-740

  Krishnamurti, Tamar ^a   Argo, Nichole ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

decision AIDS tools; detailed methodology; patient decision making; randomized trial methodology; risk communication or risk perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ASTHMA; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ASTHMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84977108947     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X16636844     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Salzburg Global Seminar. Salzburg statement on shared decision making. BMJ. 2011; 342: d1745.
2. O'Neill O., Some limits of informed consent. J Med Ethics. 2003; 29: 4-7.
3. Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V,. Informed consent-why are its goals imperfectly realized? N Engl J Med. 1980; 302: 896-900.
4. Riecken HW, Ravich R., Informed consent to biomedical research in Veterans Administration hospitals. JAMA. 1982; 248: 344-8.
5. Daugherty CK, Banik DM, Janish L, Ratain MJ., Quantitative analysis of ethical issues in phase I trials: a survey interview study of 144 advanced cancer patients. IRB. 2000; 22: 6-14.
6. Flory J, Emanuel E., Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. JAMA. 2004; 292: 1593-601.
7. Nishimura A, Carey J, Erwin PJ, Tilburt JC, Murad MH, McCormick JB., Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials. BMC Med Ethics. 2013; 14: 28.
8. Baren J, Campbell CF, Schears RM, Shofer FS, Datner EM, Hollander JE., Observed behaviors of subjects during informed consent for an emergency department study. Ann Emerg Med. 2010; 55: 9-14.
9. Kinnersley P, Phillips K, Savage K, et al. Interventions to promote informed consent for patients undergoing surgical and other invasive healthcare procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 7: CD009445.
10. Farrell EH, Whistance RN, Phillips K, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of audio-visual information aids for informed consent for invasive healthcare procedures in clinical practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2014; 94: 20-32.
11. Epstein LC, Lasagna L., Obtaining informed consent: form or substance. Arch Intern Med. 1969; 123: 682-8.
12. Gray BH, Cooke RA, Tannenbaum AS., Research involving human subjects. Science. 1978; 201: 1094-101.
13. Paasche-Orlow MK, Taylor HA, Brancati FL., Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 721-6.
14. Joffe S, Cook EF, Cleary PD, Clark JW, Weeks JC., Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet. 2001; 358: 1772-7.
15. Lavori PW, Sugarman J, Hays MT, Feussner JR,. Improving informed consent in clinical trials: a duty to experiment. Control Clin Trials. 1999; 20: 187-93.
16. Davis TC, Berkel HJ, Holcombe RF, Pramanik S, Divers SG., Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998; 90: 668-74.
17. Fischhoff B., The sciences of science communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110 (suppl 3): 14033-9.
18. Merz JF, Fischhoff B, Mazur DJ, Fischbeck PS., A decision-analytic approach to developing standards of disclosure for medical informed consent. J Products Toxics Liability. 1993; 15: 191-215.
19. Miller GA., The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 1956; 63: 81.
20. Schenker Y, Fernandez A, Sudore R, Schillinger D., Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review. Med Dec Making, 2011; 31: 151-73.
21. Maisto AA, Queen DE., Memory for pictorial information and the picture superiority effect. Educ Gerontol. 1992; 18: 213-23.
22. Hockley WE., The picture superiority effect in associative recognition. Mem Cognit. 2008; 36: 1351-9.
23. Montori VM, Brito JP, Ting HH., Patient-centered and practical application of new high cholesterol guidelines to prevent cardiovascular disease. JAMA. 2014; 311: 465-6.
24. Hoberman A, Shaikh N, Bhatnagar S, et al. Factors that influence parental decisions to participate in clinical research: consenters vs nonconsenters. JAMA Pediatr. 2013; 167: 561-6.
25. Weston J, Hannah M, Downes J., Evaluating the benefits of a patient information video during the informed consent process. Patient Educ Couns. 1997; 30: 239-45.
26. Rothwell E, Wong B, Rose NC, et al. A randomized controlled trial of an electronic informed consent process. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014; 9: 1-7.
27. Chen DT, Wynia MK, Moloney RM, Alexander GC., US physician knowledge of FDA-approved indications and evidence base for commonly prescribed drugs: results of a national survey. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009; 18: 1094-100.
28. Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD., Amazon's Mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011; 6: 3-5.
29. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry E6 Good Clinical Practice: Consolidated Guidance. [cited 2015 9 ]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/ucm073122.pdf.
30. Chew LD, Bradley KA, Boyko EJ., Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy. Fam Med. 2004; 36: 588-94.
31. Landis JR, Koch GG., The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33: 159-74.
32. Fischhoff B., Communicating Risks and Benefits: An Evidence Based User's Guide. Washington (DC): Government Printing Office; 2012.
33. Rowbotham MC, Astin J, Greene K, Cummings SR., Interactive informed consent: randomized comparison with paper consents. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e5860.
34. Yang Z, Kahlor L., What, me worry? The role of affect in information seeking and avoidance. Sci Commun. 2012; 35: 189-212.
35. Slovic P, Peters E., Risk perception and affect. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2006; 15: 322-6.
36. Frijda N, Manstead A, Bem S., Emotions and Beliefs: How Feelings Influence Thoughts. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2000.