Interactive Informed Consent: Randomized Comparison with Paper Consents

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Rowbotham, Michael C ^a   Astin, John ^a   Greene, Kaitlin ^a   Cummings, Steven R ^a,b  

^a CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b San Francisco Coordinating Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERACTIVE INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; PAPER CONSENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SATISFACTION; TIME;

AUDIOVISUAL AIDS; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; COMPREHENSION; CONSENT FORMS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RESEARCH SUBJECTS;

EID: 84874583813     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058603     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Moscucci M, Brennan-Martinez CM, Levine R, (2009) Patient Comprehension of an interactive, computer-based information program for cardiac catheterization: a comparison with standard information. Ach Intern Med 169: 1907-1914.
2. Riecken HW, Ravich R, (1982) Informed consent to biomedical research in Veterans Administration hospitals. JAMA 248: 344-348.
3. Baren J, Campbell CF, Schears RM, Shofer FS, Datner EM, et al. (2010) Observed behaviors of subjects during informed consent for an emergency department study. Ann Emerg Med 55: 9-14.
4. McNutt LA, Waltermaurer E, Bednarczyk RA, Carlson BE, Kotval J, et al. (2008) Are we misjudging how well informed consent forms are read? J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 3: 89-97.
5. Lee R, Lampert S, Wilder L, Sowell AL, (2011) Subjects agree to participate in environmental health studies without fully comprehending the associated risk. Int J Environ Res Public Health 8: 830-841.
6. Flory J, Emanuel E, (2004) Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. JAMA 292: 1593-1601.
7. Schenker Y, Meisel A, (2011) Informed consent in clinical care: practical considerations in the effort to achieve ethical goals. JAMA 305: 1130-1131.
8. Antoniou EE, Draper H, Reed K, Burls A, Southwood TR, et al. (2011) An empirical study on the preferred size of the participant information sheet in research. J Med Ethics 37: 557-562.
9. Fink AS, Prochazka AV, Henderson WG, Bartenfeld D, Nyirenda C, et al. (2010) Enhancement of surgical informed consent by addition of repeat back: a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 252: 27-36.