Comparison of non-invasive MRI measurements of cerebral blood flow in a large multisite cohort

Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 1244-1256

  Dolui, Sudipto ^a,b   Wang, Ze ^b,c   Wang, Danny J J ^d   Mattay, Raghav ^b   Finkel, Mack ^a   Elliott, Mark ^a   Desiderio, Lisa ^a   Inglis, Ben ^e   Mueller, Bryon ^f   Stafford, Randall B ^g   Launer, Lenore J ^h   Jacobs, David R ^f   Bryan, R Nick ^a   Detre, John A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c HANGZHOU NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^h NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebral blood flow; labeling efficiency; phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging; pseudo continuous arterial spin labeling; semi automated vessel segmentation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTERIAL BLOOD; ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PHASE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDO CONTINUOUS ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING; SPIN LABELING; BRAIN ARTERY; BRAIN CIRCULATION; BRAIN MAPPING; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL ARTERIES; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; COHORT STUDIES; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 84976869027     PISSN: 0271678X     EISSN: 15597016     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0271678X16646124     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Jain V, Langham MC, and Wehrli FW. MRI estimation of global brain oxygen consumption rate. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2010; 30: 1598-1607
2. Kety SS, and Schmidt CF. The determination of cerebral blood flow in man by the use of nitrous oxide in low concentrations. Am J Physiol 1945; 143: 53-66
3. Herscovitch P, Markham J, and Raichle ME. Brain blood flow measured with intravenous H2(15)O. I. Theory, and error analysis. J Nucl Med 1983; 24: 782-789
4. Dagal A, and Lam AM. Cerebral blood flow, and the injured brain: how should we monitor, and manipulate it?. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2011; 24: 131-137
5. Detre JA, Wang J, Wang Z, et al. Arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI in basic, and clinical neuroscience. Curr Opin Neurol 2009; 22: 348-355
6. Williams DS, Detre JA, Leigh JS, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992; 89: 212-216
7. Detre JA, Leigh JS, Williams DS, et al. Perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992; 23: 37-45
8. Zhang W, Williams DS, Detre JA, et al. Measurement of brain perfusion by volume-localized NMR spectroscopy using inversion of arterial water spins: accounting for transit time, and cross-relaxation. Magn Reson Med 1992; 25: 362-371
9. Detre JA, Zhang W, Roberts DA, et al. Tissue specific perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling. NMR Biomed 1994; 7: 75-82
10. Alsop DC, and Detre JA. Reduced transit-Time sensitivity in noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging of human cerebral blood flow. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996; 16: 1236-1249
11. Buxton RB, Frank LR, Wong EC, et al. A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40: 383-396
12. Wong EC, Buxton RB, and Frank LR. A theoretical, and experimental comparison of continuous, and pulsed arterial spin labeling techniques for quantitative perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40: 348-355
13. Alsop DC, Detre JA, Golay X, et al. Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group, and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 2015; 73: 102-116
14. Dai W, Garcia D, de Bazelaire C, et al. Continuous flowdriven inversion for arterial spin labeling using pulsed radio frequency, and gradient fields. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60: 1488-1497
15. Aslan S, Xu F, Wang PL, et al. Estimation of labeling efficiency in pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 765-771
16. Spilt A, Box FM, Van der Geest RJ, et al. Reproducibility of total cerebral blood flow measurements using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16: 1-5
17. Bakker CJ, Hartkamp MJ, and Mali WP. Measuring blood flow by nontriggered 2D phase-contrast MR angiography. Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 14: 609-614
18. Jung Y, Wong EC, and Liu TT. Multiphase pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling (MP-PCASL) for robust quantification of cerebral blood flow. Magn Reson Med 2010; 64: 799-810
19. Vidorreta M, Wang Z, Rodriguez I, et al.comparison of 2D, and 3D single-shot ASL perfusion fMRI sequences. Neuroimage 2013; 66: 662-671
20. Leenders KL, Perani D, Lammertsma AA, et al. Cerebral blood flow, blood volume, and oxygen utilization. Normal values, and effect of age. Brain 1990; 113(Pt 1): 27-47
21. Rodriguez G, Warkentin S, Risberg J, et al. Sex differences in regional cerebral blood flow. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1988; 8: 783-789
22. Jain V, Duda J, Avants B, et al. Longitudinal reproducibility, and accuracy of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeled perfusion MR imaging in typically developing children. Radiology 2012; 263: 527-536
23. Wang Z, Aguirre GK, Rao H, et al. Empirical optimization of ASL data analysis using an ASL data processing toolbox: ASLtbx. Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 26: 261-269
24. Wang Z. Improving cerebral blood flow quantification for arterial spin labeled perfusion MRI by removing residual motion artifacts, and global signal fluctuations. Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 30: 1409-1415
25. Wang J, Zhang Y, Wolf RL, et al. Amplitude-modulated continuous arterial spin-labeling 3.0-T perfusion MR imaging with a single coil: Feasibility study. Radiology 2005; 235: 218-228
26. Lu H, Clingman C, Golay X, et al. Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 679-682
27. Silvennoinen MJ, Kettunen MI, and Kauppinen RA. Effects of hematocrit, and oxygen saturation level on blood spin-lattice relaxation. Magn Reson Med 2003; 49: 568-571
28. Eggert LD, Sommer J, Jansen A, et al. Accuracy, and reliability of automated gray matter segmentation pathways on real, and simulated structural magnetic resonance images of the human brain. PloS One 2012; 7: e45081
29. Brett M, Johnsrude IS, and Owen AM. The problem of functional localization in the human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002; 3: 243-249
30. Lagerstrand KM, Lehmann H, Starck G, et al. Method to correct for the effects of limited spatial resolution in phase-contrast flow MRI measurements. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48: 883-889
31. Tang C, Blatter DD, and Parker DL. Correction of partial-volume effects in phase-contrast flow measurements. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 5: 175-180
32. Hamilton CA. Correction of partial volume inaccuracies in quantitative phase contrast MR angiography. Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 12: 1127-1130
33. Lotz J, Meier C, Leppert A, et al. Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: basic facts, and implementation. Radiographics 2002; 22: 651-671
34. Paulson OB, Strandgaard S, and Edvinsson L. Cerebral autoregulation. Cerebrovasc Brain Metabol Rev 1990; 2: 161-192
35. Giller CA. A bedside test for cerebral autoregulation using transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1991; 108: 7-14
36. Florence G, and Seylaz J. Rapid autoregulation of cerebral blood flow: a laser-Doppler flowmetry study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1992; 12: 674-680
37. Zhang R, Zuckerman JH, Giller CA, et al. Transfer function analysis of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans. Am J Physiol 1998; 274(1 Pt 2): H233-H241
38. Wu WC, Edlow BL, Elliot MA, et al. Physiological modulations in arterial spin labeling perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Transac Med imaging 2009; 28: 703-709
39. Ye FQ, Berman KF, Ellmore T, et al. H(2)(15)O PET validation of steady-state arterial spin tagging cerebral blood flow measurements in humans. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44: 450-456
40. Xu G, Rowley HA, Wu GM, et al. Reliability, and precision of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI on 3.0 T, and comparison with 15O-water PET in elderly subjects at risk for Alzheimer's disease. NMR Biomed 2010; 23: 286-293
41. Zhang K, Herzog H, Mauler J, et al.comparison of cerebral blood flow acquired by simultaneous [15O]water positron emission tomography, and arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2014; 34: 1373-1380
42. Chen Y, Wang DJ, and Detre JA. Test-retest reliability of arterial spin labeling with common labeling strategies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33: 940-949
43. Shin DD, Liu TT, Wong EC, et al. Pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling with optimized tagging efficiency. Magn Resona Med 2012; 68: 1135-1144