Motor Learning and the Dance Technique Class: Science, Tradition, and Pedagogy

Journal of Dance Education

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 87-95

  Enghauser, Rebecca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84975813799     PISSN: 15290824     EISSN: 2158074X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15290824.2003.10387235     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Puretz, S. 1988. “ Psychomotor research and the dance teacher. ”. In Science of Dance Training Edited by: Clarkson, P M., and Skrinar, M. 282Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc.
2. Schmidt, R A., and Lee, T D., 1999. Motor Control and Learning 264Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc.
3. Skrinar, M. 1988. “ Selected motor learning applications to the technique class. ”. In Science of Dance Training Edited by: Clarkson, P M., and Skrinar, M. 269Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc.
4. Puretz, S. 1988. 279
5. Bruning, R H., Schraw, G J., and Ronning, R R., 1999. Cognitive Psychology and Instruction Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
6. Pashler, H. 1992. Attentional limitations in doing two tasks at the same time. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 1: 44–47.
7. Reisberg, D. 1997. Cognition: Exploring the Science of the Mind 109New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
8. Reisberg, D. 1997. 111
9. Bransford, J D., Brown, A L., and Cocking, R R., 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School 10Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10. Wulf, G, and Hoss, W P., 1998. Instructions for motor learning: Differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30 (2): 169–179.
11. Wulf, G, Lauterbach, B, and Toole, T. 1999. Learning advantages of an external focus of attention in golf. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70: 120–126.
12. Wulf, G, McNevin, N H., and Shea, C H., 2001. The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54 (A): 1143–1154.
13. Wulf, G, McConnel, N, Gartner, M, and Schwarz, A. 2002. Enhancing the learning of sport skills through external-focus feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34 (2): 171–182.
14. Wulf, G, Shea, C H., and Park, J H., 2001. Attention in motor learning: Preferences for and advantages of an external focus. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72 (4): 335–344.
15. Underwood, B J., 1966. Experimental Psychology, 2nd ed Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16. Puretz, S. 1983. Bilateral transfer: The effects of practice on the transfer of complex dance movement patterns. Research Quarterly, 54 (1): 48–54.
17. Shea, J B., and Morgan, R L., 1979. Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5: 179–187.
18. Lee, T D., and Magill, R A., 1985. Influence of practice schedule on testing schema theory predictions in adults. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17: 283–299.
19. Schmidt, R A., and Lee, T D., 1999. 324–325.
20. Schmidt, R A., and Lee, T D., 1999. 330
21. Winstein, C J., and Schmidt, R A., 1990. Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16: 677–691.
22. Schmidt, R A., and Lee, T D., 1999. 326–352.
23. Salmoni, A W., Schmidt, R A., and Walter, C B., 1984. Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95: 355–386.
24. Schmidt, R A., and Lee, T D., 1999. 290–291.
25. Adams, J A., 1986. Use of the model's knowledge of results to increase the observer's performance. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 12: 89–98.
26. Schmidt, R A., and Lee, T D., 1999. 292
27. Bransford, J D., Brown, A L., and Cocking, R R., 2000. 18
28. Cratty, B. 1973. Teaching Motor Skills Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29. Borrelli, G, and Skrinar, M. 1982. Instructional cue use in two dance idioms. Kinesiology for Dance, 5 (1): 6