New directions in policy borrowing research

Asia Pacific Education Review

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 381-390

  Steiner Khamsi, Gita ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Global education policy; Globalization studies; Policy borrowing; Policy studies; School reform

Indexed keywords

EID: 84975476625     PISSN: 15981037     EISSN: 1876407X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12564-016-9442-9     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson-Levitt, K. (2012). Complicating the concept of culture. Comparative Education, 48(4), 441–454.
2. Ball, S. J. (2012). Global Education Inc. New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. London, New York: Routledge.
3. Beech, J. (2011). Global panaceas, local realities. International agencies and the future of education. Frankfurt: Lang.
4. Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. London: Taylor and Francis.
5. Cowen, R. (2000). Comparing futures or comparing pasts? Comparative Education, 36(3), 333–342.
6. Cowen, R. (2009). The transfer, translation and transformation of educational processes: And their shape-shifting? Comparative Education, 45(3), 315–327.
7. Cummings, W. K. (1989). The American perception of Japanese education. Comparative Education, 25(3), 293–302.
8. Foster, P. (1998). Foreword. In H. J. Noah & M. A. Eckstein (Eds.), Doing comparative education: Three decades of collaboration (pp. 1–8). Hong Kong: CERC Studies in Comparative Education.
9. Green Saraisky, N. (2015). The politics of international large-scale assessment: The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and American educational discourse, 2000–2012. UMI dissertations, Columbia University, ProQuest.
10. Julius Baer, B. (2014). Tracker certificate on the global education basket. Zurich: Julius Baer.
11. Kingdon, J. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
12. Lao, R. (2015). The culture of borrowing: One hundred years of thailand higher education reforms. London, New York: Routledge.
13. Luhmann, N. (1990). Essays on self-reference. New York: Columbia University Press.
14. Luhmann, N. (1997). Globalization or world society: How to conceive of modern society. International Review of Sociology, 7(1), 67–79.
15. Phillips, D. (2004). Toward a theory of policy attraction in education. In G. Steiner-Khamsi (Ed.), The global politics of educational borrowing and lending (pp. 54–67). New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Radtke, F.-O. (2009). Evidenzbasierte Steuerung: Der Aufmarsch der Manager im Erziehungssystem. In R. Tippelt (Ed.), Steuerung durch Indikatoren. Budrich: Leverkusen-Opladen.
17. Schriewer, J. (1990). The method of comparison and the need for externalization: methodological criteria and sociological concepts. In J. Schriewer & B. Holmes (Eds.), Theories and methods in comparative education (pp. 3–52). Bern: Lang.
18. Schriewer, J., & Martinez, C. (2004). Constructions of internationality in education. In G. Steiner-Khamsi (Ed.), The global politics of educational borrowing and lending (pp. 29–53). New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2003). The Politics of League Tables. Journal of Social Science Education, 1(1), online journal.
20. Steiner-Khamsi, G. (Ed.). (2004). The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. New York: Teachers College Press.
21. Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Waldow, F. (Eds.) (2012). Policy borrowing and lending. World yearbook of education 2012. London, New York: Routledge.
22. Takayama, K. (2010). Politics of externalization in reflexive times: Reinventing Japanese education reform discourses through “Finnish success”. Comparative Education Review, 54(1), 51–75.
23. Takayama, K., Waldow, F., & Sung, Y.-K. (2013). Finland has it all? Examining the media accentuation of ‘Finnish Education’ in Australia, Germany and South Korea. Research in Comparative and International Education, 8(3), 307–325.
24. Tsuneyoshi, R. (2004). The new Japanese educational reforms and the achievement “crisis” debate. Educational Policy, 18(2), 364–394.
25. Verger, A., Lubienski, C., & Steiner-Khamsi, G. (Eds.). (2016). The global education industry. London, New York: Routledge.
26. Vidovich, L. (2004). Global-national-local dynamics in policy processes: A case of “quality” policy in higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(3), 341–354.
27. Waldow, F. (2010). Der Traum vom ‘skandinavisch schlau Werden’—Drei Thesen zur Rolle Finnlands als Projektionsfläche in der gegenwärtigen Bildungsdebatte. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 56(4), 497–511.
28. Waldow, F. (2016). Das Ausland als Gegenargument: Fünf Thesen zur Bedeutung nationaler Stereotype und negativer Referenzgesellschaften. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 3, 403–421.
29. Waldow, F., Takayama, K., & Sung, Y.-K. (2014). Rethinking the pattern of external policy referencing: Media discourses over the “Asian Tigers” PISA success in Australia, Germany and South Korea. Comparative Education Review, 50(3), 302–321.
30. Watts, D. J. (2003). Six degrees: The science of a connected age. New York: Norton.