Validation of the board certification system for expert surgeons (hepato-biliary-pancreatic field) using the data of the National Clinical Database of Japan: part 2 – Pancreatoduodenectomy

Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 353-363

  Miura, Fumihiko ^a   Yamamoto, Masakazu ^a   Gotoh, Mitsukazu ^b   Konno, Hiroyuki ^b   Fujimoto, Jiro ^a   Yanaga, Katsuhiko ^a   Kokudo, Norihiro ^a   Yamaue, Hiroki ^a   Wakabayashi, Go ^a   Seto, Yasuyuki ^b   Unno, Michiaki ^a   Miyata, Hiroaki ^b,c   Hirahara, Norimichi ^c   Miyazaki, Masaru ^a  

^a Department of Surgery   (Japan)

^b National Clinical Database Data Quality Management Subcommittee   (Japan)

^c KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Board certification; Centralization; Hepatectomy; Hepato biliary pancreatic surgery; High volume hospital; Pancreatoduodenectomy

Indexed keywords

CENTRALIZATION; CERTIFICATION; DATA BASE; HIGH VOLUME HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; JAPAN; LIVER RESECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PANCREAS; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; SURGEON; SURGERY; SURGICAL MORTALITY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 84975318197     PISSN: 18686974     EISSN: 18686982     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.348     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Takada T. Preface I: Highly advanced surgery in the hepatobiliary and pancreatic field. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012;19:1.
2. Unno M. Preface II: Highly advanced surgery in the hepatobiliary and pancreatic field. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012;19:2.
3. Miyata H, Gotoh M, Hashimoto H, Motomura N, Murakami A, Tomotaki A, et al. Challenges and prospects of a clinical database linked to the board certification system. Surg Today. 2014;44:1991–9.
4. Murakami A, Hirata Y, Motomura N, Miyata H, Iwanaka T, Takamoto S. The national clinical database as an initiative for quality improvement in Japan. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;47:437–43.
5. Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Kitagawa Y, Baba H, Kimura W, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:259–66.
6. Watanabe M, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Baba H, Kimura W, Tomita N, et al. Total gastrectomy risk model: data from 20,011 Japanese patients in a nationwide internet-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:1034–9.
7. Kimura W, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Hirai I, Kenjo A, Kitagawa Y, et al. A pancreaticoduodenectomy risk model derived from 8575 cases from a national single-race population (Japanese) using a web-based data entry system: the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2014;259:773–80.
8. Kobayashi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Baba H, Kimura W, Kitagawa Y, et al. Risk model for right hemicolectomy based on 19,070 Japanese patients in the National Clinical Database. J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:1047–55.
9. Kenjo A, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Kitagawa Y, Shimada M, Baba H, et al. Risk stratification of 7,732 hepatectomy cases in 2011 from the National Clinical Database for Japan. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218:412–22.
10. Nakagoe T, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Anazawa T, Baba H, Kimura W, et al. Surgical risk model for acute diffuse peritonitis based on a Japanese nationwide database: an initial report on the surgical and 30-day mortality. Surg Today. 2015;45:1233–43.
11. Miura F, Yamamoto M. Gotoh M, Konno H, Fujimoto J, Yanaga K, et al. Validation of the board certification system for expert surgeons (hepato-biliary-pancreatic field) using the data of the National Clinical Database of Japan: part 1 - Hepatectomy of more than one segment. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23:313–23.
12. Gotoh M, Miyata H, Hashimoto H, Wakabayashi G, Konno H, Miyakawa S, et al. National Clinical Database feedback implementation for quality improvement of cancer treatment in Japan: from good to great through transparency. Surg Today. 2016;46:38–47.
13. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8–13.
14. Yoshioka R, Yasunaga H, Hasegawa K, Horiguchi H, Fushimi K, Aoki T, et al. Impact of hospital volume on hospital mortality, length of stay and total costs after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2014;101:523–9.
15. Pal N, Axisa B, Yusof S, Newcombe RG, Wemyss-Holden S, Rhodes M, et al. Volume and outcome for major upper GI surgery in England. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:353–7.
16. Lin HC, Xirasagar S, Lee HC, Chai CY. Hospital volume and inpatient mortality after cancer-related gastrointestinal resections: the experience of an Asian country. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1182–8.
17. Topal B, Van de Sande S, Fieuws S, Penninckx F. Effect of centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on nationwide hospital mortality and length of stay. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1377–81.
18. Balzano G, Zerbi A, Capretti G, Rocchetti S, Capitanio V, Di Carlo V. Effect of hospital volume on outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in Italy. Br J Surg. 2008;95:357–62.
19. de Wilde RF, Besselink MG, van der Tweel I, de Hingh IH, van Eijck CH, Dejong CH, et al. Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality. Br J Surg. 2012;99:404–10.
20. Kim CG, Jo S, Kim JS. Impact of surgical volume on nationwide hospital mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:4175–81.
21. Stitzenberg KB, Meropol NJ. Trends in centralization of cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2824–31.
22. Nordback L, Parviainen M, Raty S, Kuivanen H, Sand J. Resection of the head of the pancreas in Finland: effects of hospital and surgeon on short-term and long-term results. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37:1454–60.
23. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:1364–9.
24. Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280:1747–51.
25. van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ, de Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, et al. Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg. 2005;242:781–8.
26. Liu JH, Zingmond DS, McGory ML, SooHoo NF, Ettner SL, Brook RH, et al. Disparities in the utilization of high-volume hospitals for complex surgery. JAMA. 2006;296:1973–80.
27. Kim CG, Kwak EK, Lee SI. The relationship between hospital volume and outcome of gastrointestinal cancer surgery in Korea. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104:116–23.
28. Tol JA, van Gulik TM, Busch OR, Gouma DJ. Centralization of highly complex low-volume procedures in upper gastrointestinal surgery. A summary of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Dig Surg. 2012;29:374–83.
29. Al-Refaie WB, Muluneh B, Zhong W, Parsons HM, Tuttle TM, Vickers SM, et al. Who receives their complex cancer surgery at low-volume hospitals? J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214:81–7.
30. Ravaioli M, Pinna AD, Francioni G, Montorsi M, Veneroni L, Grazi GL, et al. A partnership model between high- and low-volume hospitals to improve results in hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery. Ann Surg. 2014;260:871–7.
31. Suzuki H, Gotoh M, Sugihara K, Kitagawa Y, Kimura W, Kondo S, et al. Nationwide survey and establishment of a clinical database for gastrointestinal surgery in Japan: Targeting integration of a cancer registration system and improving the outcome of cancer treatment. Cancer Sci. 2011;102:226–30.
32. Glasgow RE, Mulvihill SJ. Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer. West J Med. 1996;165:294–300.
33. Bliss LA, Yang CJ, Chau Z, Ng SC, McFadden DW, Kent TS, et al. Patient selection and the volume effect in pancreatic surgery: unequal benefits? HPB (Oxford). 2014;16:899–906.
34. Chowdhury MM, Dagash H, Pierro A. A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome. Br J Surg. 2007;94:145–61.
35. Stitzenberg KB, Sheldon GF. Progressive specialization within general surgery: adding to the complexity of workforce planning. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:925–32.
36. Prystowsky JB, Bordage G, Feinglass JM. Patient outcomes for segmental colon resection according to surgeon's training, certification, and experience. Surgery. 2002;132:663–70.
37. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.
38. Kawai M, Kondo S, Yamaue H, Wada K, Sano K, Motoi F, et al. Predictive risk factors for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula analyzed in 1,239 patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy: multicenter data collection as a project study of pancreatic surgery by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18:601–8.
39. Tani M, Kawai M, Hirono S, Hatori T, Imaizumi T, Nakao A, et al. Use of omentum or falciform ligament does not decrease complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: nationwide survey of the Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery. Surgery. 2012;151:183–91.
40. Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, Radzyner M, Brennan MF. Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg. 2005;242:540–4.
41. Gooiker GA, van Gijn W, Wouters MW, Post PN, van de Velde CJ, Tollenaar RA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98:485–94.