Nationwide survey and establishment of a clinical database for gastrointestinal surgery in Japan: Targeting integration of a cancer registration system and improving the outcome of cancer treatment

Cancer Science

Volumn 102, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 226-230

  Suzuki, Hiroyuki ^a   Gotoh, Mitsukazu ^a   Sugihara, Kenichi ^b   Kitagawa, Yuko ^c   Kimura, Wataru ^d   Kondo, Satoshi ^e   Shimada, Mitsuo ^f   Tomita, Naohiro ^g   Nakagoe, Tohru ^h   Hashimoto, Hideki ⁱ   Baba, Hideo ^j   Miyata, Hiroaki ⁱ   Motomura, Noboru ^k  

^a FUKUSHIMA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d YAMAGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TOKUSHIMA   (Japan)

^g HYOGO COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^h Nagasakiken Saiseikai Hospital   (Japan)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^j KUMAMOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^k UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER THERAPY; DATA BASE; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM CANCER; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; GASTRECTOMY; GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; INTEGRATION; JAPAN; LIVER RESECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORTALITY; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM RESECTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TOTAL STOMACH RESECTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; JAPAN; NEOPLASMS; REGISTRIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78650193866     PISSN: 13479032     EISSN: 13497006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01749.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Garout M, Tilney HS, Tekkis PP, Aylin P. Comparison of administrative data with the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) colorectal cancer database. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008; 23: 155-63.
2. Lin HC, Xirasagar S, Lee HC, Chai CY. Hospital volume and inpatient mortality after cancer-related gastrointestinal resections: the experience of an Asian country. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13: 1182-8.
3. Hankey BF, Ries LA, Edwards BK. The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: a national resource. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999; 8: 1117-21.
4. Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Schrag D, Bach PB, Riley GF. Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care 2002; 40(Suppl 8): IV-3-18.
5. Cohen ME, Dimick JB, Bilimoria KY, Ko CY, Richards K, Hall BL. Risk adjustment in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: a comparison of logistic versus hierarchical modeling. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 209: 687-93.
6. Miyata H, Motomura N, Ueda Y, Matsuda H, Takamoto S. Effect of procedural volume on outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Japan: implication toward public reporting and minimal volume standards. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 135: 1306-12.
7. Sobue T. Current activities and future directions of the cancer registration system in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 2008; 13: 97-101.
8. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2117-27.
9. Jamieson GG, Mathew G, Ludemann R, Wayman J, Myers JC, Devitt PG. Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 943-7.
10. van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ et al. Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 781-8.
11. Simunovic M, Rempel E, Thériault ME et al. Influence of hospital characteristics on operative death and survival of patients after major cancer surgery in Ontario. Can J Surg 2006; 49: 251-8.
12. Killeen SD, O'Sullivan MJ, Coffey JC, Kirwan WO, Redmond HP. Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 389-402.
13. Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR. Is volume related to outcome in health care? a systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 511-20.
14. Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, Stukel TA. Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2007; 245: 777-83.
15. Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 1998; 280: 1747-51.
16. Enzinger PC, Benedetti JK, Meyerhardt JA et al. Impact of hospital volume on recurrence and survival after surgery for gastric cancer. Ann Surg 2007; 245: 426-34.
17. Schmidt CM, Turrini O, House MG et al. Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreatic-oduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. Arch Surg 2010; 145: 634-40.
18. Urbach DR, Baxter NN. Does it matter what a hospital is "high volume" for? specificity of hospital volume-outcome associations for surgical procedures: analysis of administrative data BMJ 2004; 328: 737-40.
19. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W et al. Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg 1997; 185: 315-27.