Content-Based Video Recommendation System Based on Stylistic Visual Features

Journal on Data Semantics

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 99-113

  Deldjoo, Yashar ^a   Elahi, Mehdi ^a   Cremonesi, Paolo ^a   Garzotto, Franca ^a   Piazzolla, Pietro ^a   Quadrana, Massimo ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEATURE EXTRACTION; MOTION PICTURES; WEBSITES;

CONTENT-BASED RECOMMENDATION; CONTENT-BASED RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS; CONTENT-BASED TECHNIQUES; FEATURE EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES; PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS; RELEVANCE METRICS; VIDEO CONTENTS; VISUAL FEATURE;

RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS;

EID: 84975230492     PISSN: 18612032     EISSN: 18612040     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13740-016-0060-9     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B (2011) Introduction to recommender systems handbook. In: Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B, Kantor PB (eds) Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, pp 1–35
2. Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005) Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(6):734–749
3. Burke R (2002) Hybrid recommender systems: Survey and experiments. User Model User Adapt Interact 12(4):331–370. /papers/burke-umuai-ip-2002.pdf
4. Su X, Khoshgoftaar TM (2009) A survey of collaborative filtering techniques. Adv Artif Intell 2009:4
5. Balabanović M, Shoham Y (1997) Fab: Content-based, collaborative recommendation. Commun ACM 40(3):66–72
6. Lops P, De Gemmis M, Semeraro G (2011) Content-based recommender systems: State of the art and trends. In: Recommender systems handbook. Springer, pp 73–105
7. Pazzani MJ, Billsus D (2007) The adaptive web. chap. Content-based Recommendation Systems, pp 325–341. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1768197.1768209
8. Zettl H (2002) Essentials of applied media aesthetics. In: Dorai C, Venkatesh S (eds) Media Computing, The Springer International Series in Video Computing, vol 4. Springer, New York, pp 11–38
9. Cremonesi P, Koren Y, Turrin R (2010) Performance of recommender algorithms on top-n recommendation tasks. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys 2010, Barcelona, Spain, September 26–30, 2010, pp 39–46
10. Deshpande M, Karypis G (2004) Item-based top-n recommendation algorithms. ACM Trans Inf Syst (TOIS) 22(1):143–177
11. Yang B, Mei T, Hua XS, Yang L, Yang SQ, Li M (2007) Online video recommendation based on multimodal fusion and relevance feedback. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM international conference on Image and video retrieval ACM, pp 73–80
12. Zhao X, Li G, Wang M, Yuan J, Zha ZJ, Li Z, Chua TS (2011) Integrating rich information for video recommendation with multi-task rank aggregation. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia ACM, pp. 1521–1524
13. Elahi M, Ricci F, Rubens N (2013) Active learning strategies for rating elicitation in collaborative filtering: a system-wide perspective. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol (TIST) 5(1):13
14. Billsus D, Pazzani MJ (1999) A hybrid user model for news story classification. Springer, New York
15. Kelly D, Teevan J (2003) Implicit feedback for inferring user preference: a bibliography. In: ACM SIGIR Forum ACM, vol 37, pp 18–28
16. Musto C, Narducci F, Lops P, Semeraro G, de Gemmis M, Barbieri M, Korst J, Pronk V, Clout R (2012) Enhanced semantic tv-show representation for personalized electronic program guides. In: User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. Springer, pp 188–199
17. Degemmis M, Lops P, Semeraro G (2007) A content-collaborative recommender that exploits wordnet-based user profiles for neighborhood formation. User Model User Adapt Interact 17(3):217–255
18. Eirinaki M, Vazirgiannis M, Varlamis I (2003) Sewep: using site semantics and a taxonomy to enhance the web personalization process. In: Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining ACM, pp 99–108
19. Magnini B, Strapparava C (2001) Improving user modelling with content-based techniques. In: User Modeling 2001. Springer, pp 74–83
20. Mooney RJ, Roy L (2000) Content-based book recommending using learning for text categorization. In: Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Digital libraries ACM, pp 195–204
21. Ahn JW, Brusilovsky P, Grady J, He D, Syn SY (2007) Open user profiles for adaptive news systems: help or harm? In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web ACM, pp 11–20
22. Billsus D, Pazzani MJ (2000) User modeling for adaptive news access. User Model User Adapt Interact 10(2–3):147–180
23. Cantador I, Szomszor M, Alani H, Fernández M, Castells P (2008) Enriching ontological user profiles with tagging history for multi-domain recommendations
24. Middleton SE, Shadbolt NR, De Roure DC (2004) Ontological user profiling in recommender systems. ACM Trans Inf Syst (TOIS) 22(1):54–88
25. Deldjoo Y, Elahi M, Quadrana M, Cremonesi P (2015) Toward building a content-based video recommendation system based on low-level features. In: E-Commerce and Web Technologies. Springer
26. Deldjoo Y, Elahi M, Quadrana M, Cremonesi P, Garzotto F (2015) Toward effective movie recommendations based on mise-en-scène film styles. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biannual Conference on Italian SIGCHI Chapter ACM, pp 162–165
27. Bogdanov D, Herrera P (2011) How much metadata do we need in music recommendation? A subjective evaluation using preference sets. In: International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Miami, Florida, USA
28. Bogdanov D, Serrà J, Wack N, Herrera P, Serra X (2011) Unifying low-level and high-level music similarity measures. IEEE Trans Multimed 13(4):687–701
29. Knees P, Pohle T, Schedl M, Widmer G (2007) A music search engine built upon audio-based and web-based similarity measures. In: Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval ACM, pp 447–454
30. Seyerlehner K, Schedl M, Pohle T, Knees P (2010) Using block-level features for genre classification, tag classification and music similarity estimation. Submission to Audio Music Similarity and Retrieval Task of MIREX 2010
31. Canini L, Benini S, Leonardi R (2013) Affective recommendation of movies based on selected connotative features. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 23(4):636–647
32. Lehinevych T, Kokkinis-Ntrenis N, Siantikos G, Dogruöz AS, Giannakopoulos T, Konstantopoulos S (2014) Discovering similarities for content-based recommendation and browsing in multimedia collections. In: IEEE 2014 Tenth International Conference on Signal-Image Technology and Internet-Based Systems (SITIS), pp 237–243
33. Rubens N, Elahi M, Sugiyama M, Kaplan D (2015) Active learning in recommender systems. In: Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, pp 809–846
34. Davidson J, Liebald B, Liu J, Nandy P, Van Vleet T, Gargi U, Gupta S, He Y, Lambert M, Livingston B et al (2010) The youtube video recommendation system. In: Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems ACM, pp 293–296
35. Wang Y, Xing C, Zhou L (2006) Video semantic models: survey and evaluation. Int J Comput Sci Netw Secur 6:10–20
36. Hu W, Xie N, Li L, Zeng X, Maybank S (2011) A survey on visual content-based video indexing and retrieval. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 41(6):797–819
37. Lew MS, Sebe N, Djeraba C, Jain R (2006) Content-based multimedia information retrieval: State of the art and challenges. ACM Trans Multimed Comput Commun Appl (TOMM) 2(1):1–19
38. Rasheed Z, Sheikh Y, Shah M (2005) On the use of computable features for film classification. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 15(1):52–64
39. Brezeale D, Cook DJ (2008) Automatic video classification: a survey of the literature. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 38(3):416–430
40. Rasheed Z, Shah M (2003) Video categorization using semantics and semiotics. In: Video mining. Springer, pp 185–217
41. Zhou H, Hermans T, Karandikar AV, Rehg JM (2010) Movie genre classification via scene categorization. In: Proceedings of the international conference on Multimedia ACM, pp 747–750
42. Dorai C, Venkatesh S (2001) Computational media aesthetics: Finding meaning beautiful. IEEE Multimed 8(4):10–12
43. Buckland W (2008) What does the statistical style analysis of film involve? A review of moving into pictures. more on film history, style, and analysis. Lit Linguist Comput 23(2):219–230
44. Valdez P, Mehrabian A (1994) Effects of color on emotions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 123(4):394
45. Wang HL, Cheong LF (2006) Affective understanding in film. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 16(6):689–704
46. Choroś K (2009) Video shot selection and content-based scene detection for automatic classification of tv sports news. In: Tkacz E, Kapczynski A (eds) Internet Technical Development and Applications, Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 64. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 73–80
47. Barron JL, Fleet DJ, Beauchemin SS (1994) Performance of optical flow techniques. Int J Comput Vis 12(1):43–77
48. Horn BK, Schunck BG (1981) Determining optical flow. In: 1981 Technical Symposium East. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 319–331
49. Tkalcic M, Tasic JF (2003) Colour spaces: perceptual, historical and applicational background. In: EUROCON 2003. Computer as a Tool. The IEEE Region 8, vol 1, pp 304–308
50. Datasets–grouplens. http://grouplens.org/datasets/. Accessed: 2015-05-01
51. Youtube. http://www.youtube.com. Accessed: 2015-04-01
52. Kohavi R (1995) The power of decision tables. In: 8th European Conference on Machine Learning. Springer, pp 174–189
53. Kohavi R, Sommerfield D (1998) Targeting business users with decision table classifiers. In: KDD, pp 249–253
54. Freitas AA (2014) Comprehensible classification models: a position paper. ACM SIGKDD Explor Newsl 15(1):1–10
55. Guyon I, Matic N, Vapnik V et al (1996) Discovering informative patterns and data cleaning