Shedding light on the ‘dark side’ of phylogenetic comparative methods

Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 693-699

  Cooper, Natalie ^a,b   Thomas, Gavin H ^c   FitzJohn, Richard G ^d  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^d MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

assumption; bias; caveat; Ornstein Uhlenbeck; PCM; phylogenetic independent contrasts; trait dependent diversification

Indexed keywords

EID: 84974728167     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2041210X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12533     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Beaulieu, J.M., Jhwueng, D.C., Boettiger, C. & O'Meara, B.C. (2012) Modeling stabilizing selection: expanding the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck model of adaptive evolution. Evolution, 66, 2369–2383.
2. Blomberg, S.P., Lefevre, J.G., Wells, J.A. & Waterhouse, M. (2012) Independent contrasts and PGLS regression estimators are equivalent. Systematic Biology, 61, 382–391.
3. Boettiger, C., Coop, G. & Ralph, P. (2012) Is your phylogeny informative? Measuring the power of comparative methods. Evolution, 66, 2240–2251.
4. Butler, M.A. & King, A. (2004) Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modelling approach for adaptive evolution. The American Naturalist, 164, 683–695.
5. Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. & Edwards, A.W.F. (1967) Phylogenetic analysis. Models and estimation procedures. American Journal of Human Genetics, 19, 233–257.
6. Christin, P.A., Osborne, C.P., Chatelet, D.S., Columbus, J.T., Besnard, G., Hodkinson, T.R., Garrison, L.M., Vorontsova, M.S. & Edwards, E.J. (2013) Anatomical enablers and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis in grasses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 110, 1381–1386.
7. Cooper, N. & Purvis, A. (2010) Body size evolution in mammals: complexity in tempo and mode. The American Naturalist, 175, 727–738.
8. Cooper, N., Thomas, G.H. & FitzJohn, R.G. (2016a) Data from “Shedding light on the “dark side” of phylogenetic comparative methods”. figshare, DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2057802.v1.
9. Cooper, N., Bielby, J., Thomas, G.H. & Purvis, A. (2008) Macroecology and extinction risk correlates of frogs. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 17, 211–221.
10. Cooper, N., Thomas, G.H., Venditti, C., Meade, A. & Freckleton, R.P. (2016b) A cautionary note on the use of Ornstein–Uhlenbeck models in macroevolutionary studies. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society, in press.
11. Diaz-Uriarte, R. & Garland, T. Jr (1996) Testing hypotheses of correlated evolution using phylogenetically independent contrasts: sensitivity to deviations from Brownian motion. Systematic Biology, 45, 27–47.
12. Fawcett, T.W. & Higginson, A.D. (2012) Heavy use of equations impedes communication among biologists. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 11735–11739.
13. Felsenstein, J. (1973) Maximum-likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees from continuous characters. American Journal of Human Genetics, 25, 471–492.
14. Felsenstein, J. (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. The American Naturalist, 125, 1–15.
15. Felsenstein, J. (1988) Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 19, 445–471.
16. FitzJohn, R.G. (2010) Quantitative traits and diversification. Systematic Biology, 59, 619–633.
17. FitzJohn, R.G. (2012) Diversitree: comparative phylogenetic analyses of diversification in R. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 1084–1092.
18. FitzJohn, R.G., Pennell, M.W., Zanne, A.E., Stevens, P.F., Tank, D.C. & Cornwell, W.K. (2014) How much of the world is woody? Journal of Ecology, 102, 1266–1272.
19. Freckleton, R.P. (2000) Phylogenetic tests of ecological and evolutionary hypotheses: checking for phylogenetic independence. Functional Ecology, 14, 129–134.
20. Freckleton, R.P. (2009) The seven deadly sins of comparative analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22, 1367–1375.
21. Freckleton, R.P. & Harvey, P.H. (2006) Detecting non-Brownian trait evolution in adaptive radiations. PLoS Biology, 4, e373.
22. Garland, T. Jr, Harvey, P.H. & Ives, A.R. (1992) Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Systematic Biology, 41, 18–32.
23. Garland, T. Jr & Ives, A.R. (2000) Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. The American Naturalist, 155, 346–364.
24. Givnish, T.J., Barfuss, M.H., Ee, B.V., Riina, R., Schulte, K., Horres, R. et al. (2014) Adaptive radiation, correlated and contingent evolution, and net species diversification in Bromeliaceae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 71, 55–78.
25. Goldberg, E.E., Kohn, J.R., Lande, R., Robertson, K.A., Smith, S.A. & Igić, B. (2010) Species selection maintains self-incompatibility. Science, 330, 493–495.
26. Grafen, A. (1989) The phylogenetic regression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 326, 119–157.
27. Hansen, T.F. (1997) Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution, 51, 1341–1351.
28. Hansen, T.F. & Bartoszek, K. (2012) Interpreting the evolutionary regression: the interplay between observational and biological errors in phylogenetic comparative studies. Systematic Biology, 61, 413–425.
29. Hansen, T.F. & Martins, E.P. (1996) Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionary patterns: the correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution, 50, 1404–1417.
30. Hansen, T.F. & Orzack, S.H. (2005) Assessing current adaptation and phylogenetic inertia as explanations of trait evolution: the need for controlled comparisons. Evolution, 59, 2063–2072.
31. Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, M. (1991) The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
32. Ho, L.S.T. & Ané, C. (2013) Asymptotic theory with hierarchical autocorrelation: Ornstein–Uhlenbeck tree models. The Annals of Statistics, 41, 957–981.
33. Ho, L.S.T. & Ané, C. (2014) Intrinsic inference difficulties for trait evolution with Ornstein–Uhlenbeck models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 1133–1146.
34. Ives, A.R. & Garland, T. Jr (2010) Phylogenetic logistic regression for binary dependent variables. Systematic Biology, 59, 9–26.
35. Jones, K.E. & Purvis, A. (1997) An optimum body size for mammals? Comparative evidence from bats. Functional Ecology, 11, 751–756.
36. Losos, J.B. (2011) Seeing the forest for the trees: the limitations of phylogenies in comparative biology. The American Naturalist, 177, 709–727.
37. Maddison, W.P. & FitzJohn, R.G. (2015) The unsolved challenge to phylogenetic correlation tests for categorical characters. Systematic Biology, 64, 127–136.
38. Maddison, W.P., Midford, P.E. & Otto, S.P. (2007) Estimating a binary character's effect on speciation and extinction. Systematic Biology, 56, 701–710.
39. Mahler, D.L., Ingram, T., Revell, L.J. & Losos, J.B. (2013) Exceptional convergence on the macroevolutionary landscape in island lizard radiations. Science, 341, 292–295.
40. Manic Street Preachers, T. (1996) Mr Carbohydrate. A Design for Life [CD 1], track 2. Columbia Records.
41. Martins, E.P. & Hansen, T.F. (1997) Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. The American Naturalist, 149, 646–667.
42. Nee, S., May, R.M. & Harvey, P.H. (1994b) The reconstructed evolutionary process. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 344, 305–311.
43. Nee, S., Holmes, E.C., May, R.M. & Harvey, P.H. (1994a) Extinction rates can be estimated from molecular phylogenies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 344, 77–82.
44. O'Meara, B.C. (2012) Evolutionary inferences from phylogenies: a review of methods. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 43, 267–285.
45. Orme, C.D.L., Freckleton, R.P., Thomas, G.H., Petzoldt, T., Fritz, S., Isaac, N. & Pearse, W. (2013) caper: Comparative Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R. R package version 0.5.2.
46. Pagel, M. (1994) Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 255, 37–45.
47. Paradis, E. (2011) Analysis of Phylogenetics and Evolution with R. Springer, New York.
48. Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics, 20, 289–290.
49. Pennell, M.W. & Harmon, L.J. (2013) An integrative view of phylogenetic comparative methods: connections to population genetics, community ecology, and paleobiology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1289, 90–105.
50. Pennell, M.W., FitzJohn, R.G., Cornwell, W.K. & Harmon, L.J. (2015) Model adequacy and the macroevolution of angiosperm functional traits. The American Naturalist, 186, E33–E50.
51. Price, S.A., Hopkins, S.S.B., Smith, K.K. & Roth, V.L. (2012) Tempo of trophic evolution and its impact on mammalian diversification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 7008–7012.
52. Purvis, A. & Harvey, P.H. (1995) Mammal life-history evolution: a comparative test of Charnov's model. Journal of Zoology, 237, 259–283.
53. Purvis, A. & Rambaut, A. (1995) Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data. Computer Applications in the Biosciences: CABIOS, 11, 247–251.
54. Pyron, R.A. & Burbrink, F.T. (2014) Early origin of viviparity and multiple reversions to oviparity in squamate reptiles. Ecology Letters, 17, 13–21.
55. R Core Team (2015) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
56. Rabosky, D.L. & Goldberg, E.E. (2015) Model inadequacy and mistaken inferences of trait-dependent speciation. Systematic Biology, 64, 340–355.
57. Rabosky, D.L. & Huang, H. (2016) A robust semi-parametric test for detecting trait-dependent diversification. Systematic Biology. in press. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syv066.
58. Revell, L.J. (2012) phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 217–223.
59. Rohlf, F.J. (2001) Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution, 55, 2143–2160.
60. Rohlf, F.J. (2006) A comment on phylogenetic correction. Evolution, 60, 1509–1515.
61. Slater, G.J. (2014) Correction to ‘Phylogenetic evidence for a shift in the mode of mammalian body size evolution at the Cretaceous-Palaeogene boundary’, and a note on fitting macroevolutionary models to comparative paleontological data sets. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 714–718.
62. Thomas, G.H. & Freckleton, R.P. (2011) MOTMOT: models of trait Macroevolution on trees. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 145–151.
63. Westoby, M., Leishman, M.R. & Lord, J.M. (1995) On misinterpreting the phylogenetic correction. Journal of Ecology, 83, 531–534.
64. Wiens, J.J., Ackerly, D.D., Allen, A.P., Anacker, B.L., Buckley, L.B., Cornell, H.V. et al. (2010) Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. Ecology Letters, 13, 1310–1324.
65. Xie, Y. (2015) knitr: A General-Purpose Package for Dynamic Report Generation in R. R package version 1.11.