Exploratory thematic analysis for digitized archival collections

Digital Scholarship in the Humanities

Volumn 30, Issue , 2015, Pages i130-i141

  Klein, Lauren F ^a   Eisenstein, Jacob ^b   Sun, Iris ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84974726320     PISSN: 20557671     EISSN: 2055768X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqv052     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alsakran, J., Chen, Y., Luo, D., et al. (2012). Real-time visualization of streaming text with a force-based dynamic system. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 32(1): 34-45.
2. Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4): 77-84.
3. Brown, T., Baldridge, J., Esteva, M. and Xu, W. (2012). The substantial words are in the ground and sea: computationally linking text and geography. Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 54(3): 324-39.
4. Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D. and Shneiderman, B. (eds) (1999). Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA (USA).
5. Chuang, J., Gupta, S., Manning, C. and Heer, J. (2013). Topic model diagnostics: assessing domain relevance via topical alignment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. vol. 28. JMLR W&CP, pp. 612-20.
6. Chuang, J., Ramage, D., Manning, C. and Heer, J. (2012). Interpretation and trust: designing model-driven visualizations for text analysis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, pp. 443-52.
7. Clytus, R. (2007). Envisioning Slavery: American Abolition and the Primacy of the Visual. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA.
8. Cordell, R. and Smith, D. (2013). Viral Texts. http://viraltexts.org/
9. Cox, T. F. and Cox, M. A. (2010). Multidimensional Scaling. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
10. Cui, W., Liu, S., Tan, L., et al. (2011). Textflow: towards better understanding of evolving topics in text. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12): 2412-21.
11. Davis, D. B. (1997). Antebellum American Culture: An Interpretive Anthology. Penn State University Press, College Park, PA, USA.
12. Drucker, J. (2011). Humanities approaches to graphical display. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 5(1).
13. Dudden, F. (2011). Fighting Chance: The Struggle Over Woman Suffrage and Black Suffrage in America. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA.
14. Eisenstein, J., Chau, D. H., Kittur, A. and Xing, E. P. (2012). TopicViz: Interactive topic exploration in document collections. CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, pp. 2177-82.
15. Ferster, B. (2012). Interactive Visualization: Insight Through Inquiry. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
16. Gelman, A. (2004). Exploratory data analysis for complex models. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 13(4): 775-79.
17. Goldstone, A. (2014). Topic Model Browser. http://agoldst. github.io/dfr-browser/demo/
18. Goldstone, A. and Underwood, T. (2014). The quiet transformations of literary studies: what thirteen thousand scholars could tell us. New Literary History, 45(3): 359-84.
19. Hearst, M. and Muralidharan, A. (2013). Wordseer. http://wordseer.berkeley.edu/
20. Hu, Y., Boyd-Graber, J., Satinoff, B. and Smith, A. (2014). Interactive topic modeling. Machine Learning, 95(3): 423-69.
21. Jockers, M. (2013). Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History. University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL, USA.
22. Jockers, M. L. and Mimno, D. (2013). Significant themes in 19th-century literature. Poetics, 41(6): 750-69.
23. Karcher, C. (1997). The First Woman in the Republic: A Cultural Biography of Lydia Maria Child. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, USA.
24. McCallum, A. K. (2002). MALLET: A Machine Learning for Language Toolkit. http://mallet.cs.umass.edu.
25. Michel, J. B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., et al. (2011). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science, 331(6014): 176-82.
26. Muralidharan, A. and Hearst, M. A. (2012). Supporting exploratory text analysis in literature study. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 28(2): 283-95.
27. Murdock, J. (2014). InPhO Topic Explorer. http://inphodata. cogs.indiana.edu/
28. Nelson, R. (2013). Mining the Dispatch. http://dsl.richmond. edu/dispatch/
29. Newman, D. J. and Block, S. (2006). Probabilistic topic decomposition of an eighteenth-century American newspaper. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(6): 753-67.
30. Rhody, L. (2012a). Topic modeling and figurative language. Journal of Digital Humanities, 2(1).
31. Rhody, L. (2012b). Some Assembly Required: Understanding and Interpreting Topics in LDA Models of Figurative Language. http://www.lisarhody. com/some-assembly-required/
32. Rockwell, G. (2003). What is text analysis, really? Literary and Linguistic Computing, 18(2): 209-19.
33. Rockwell, G., Sinclair, S. G., Ruecker, S. and Organisciak, P. (2010). Ubiquitous text analysis. Poetess Archive Journal, 2(1): 1-19.
34. Russell, D. M., Stefik, M. J., Pirolli, P. and Card, S. K. (1993). The cost structure of sensemaking. In Proceedings of the INTERACT'93 and CHI'93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, pp. 269-76.
35. Sherratt, T. and the National Library of Australia. (2014). Trove. http://trove.nla.gov.au/
36. Sinclair, S. (2003). Computer-Assisted Reading: Reconceiving Text Analysis. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 18(2): 175-84.
37. Sinclair, S., Rockwell, G., and the Voyant Tools Team. (2012). Voyant Tools. http://voyant-tools.org/
38. Torget, A., et al. (2011). Mapping Texts. http://mapping-texts. org/.
39. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, USA.
40. Wei, F., Liu, S., Song, Y., et al. (2010). TIARA: a visual exploratory text analytic system. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, pp. 153-162.
41. Wise, J. A. (1999). The ecological approach to text visualization. JASIS, 50(13): 1224-33.
42. Yi, J. S., Melton, R., Stasko, J. and Jacko, J. A. (2005). Dust and magnet: multivariate information visualization using a magnet metaphor. Information Visualization, 4(4): 239-56.