Supporting exploratory text analysis in literature study

Literary and Linguistic Computing

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 283-295

  Muralidharan, Aditi ^a   Hearst, Marti A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878459498     PISSN: 02681145     EISSN: 14774615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqs044     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Al-Malki, A., Kaufer, D., Ishizaki, S., and Dreher, K. (2012). Arab Women in Arab News: Old Stereotypes and New Media, 1st edn. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
2. Clement, T. E. (2008). A thing not beginning and not ending: using digital tools to distant-read Gertrude Stein's The Making of Americans. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 23(3): 361-81.
3. Eick, S.G. (1994). Graphically displaying text. Computational and Graphical Statistics, 3(2): 127-42.
4. Fekete, J. and Dufournaud, N. (2000). Compus: Visualization and Analysis of Structured Documents for Understanding Social Life in the 16th Century. In: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, DL '00. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 47-55. ACM ID: 336632.
5. Hearst, M.A. (2009). Supporting the Search Process. In Search User Interfaces. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157-173. http://searchuserinterfaces.com/book/sui_ch7_search_process_tools.html (accessed 11 December 2012).
6. Hope, J. and Witmore, M. (2004). The very large textual object: a prosthetic reading of Shakespeare. Early Modern Literary Studies, 9(3): 1-36.
7. Ishizaki, S. and Kaufer, D. (2011). Computer-Aided Rhetorical Analysis. In McCarthy, P. and Boonthum, C. (eds), Applied Natural Language Processing: Identification, Investigation, and Resolution, 1st edn. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 276-96.
8. Islam, A. and Inkpen, D. (2008). Semantic text similarity using corpus-based word similarity and string similarity. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), 2(2): 10.
9. Jurafsky, D. and Martin, J.H. (2009). Chapter 13 Syntactic Parsing. Speech and Language Processing. 2nd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, pp. 427-59.
10. Lewis, J., Ossowski, S., Hicks, J., Errami, M., and Garner, H.R. (2006). Text similarity: an alternative way to search MEDLINE. Bioinformatics, 22(18): 2298-304.
11. Lin, D. (1997). Using Syntactic Dependency as Local Context to Resolve Word Sense Ambiguity. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 2. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 64-71.
12. Llora, X., Acs, B., Auvil, L.S., Capitanu, B., Welge, M.E., and Goldberg, D.E. (2008). Meandre: Semantic-driven Data-Intensive Flows in the Clouds. Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Conference on eScience. Indianapolis, IN: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 238-45.
13. Metzler, D., Dumais, S., and Meek, C. (2007). Similarity Measures for Short Segments of Text. In Amati, G., Carpineto, C., and Romano, G. (eds), Advances in Information Retrieval, vol. 4425. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer.
14. Mihalcea, R., Corley, C., and Strapparava, C. (2006). Corpus-based and Knowledge-based Measures of Text Semantic Similarity. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 21. Boston, MA: AAAI Press; MIT Press, pp. 775-80.
15. Mueller, M. (2008). Digital Shakespeare, or towards a literary informatics. Shakespeare, 4(3): 284-301.
16. Mueller, M. (2009). MorphAdorner. http://morphadorner.northwestern.edu/morphadorner (accessed 13 January 2012).
17. Muralidharan, A. (2012). Using Digital Tools to Explore Narrative Conventions in the North American Antebellum Slave Narratives. Networks, Maps, and Words: Digital-Humanities Approaches to the Archive of American Slavery, Modern Language Association, Session 468. http://www.mla.org/conv_listings_detail?prog_id=468&year=2012 (accessed 19 December 2012).
18. O'Day, V.L. and Jeffries, R. (1993). Orienteering in an Information Landscape: How Information Seekers Get from Here to There. Proceedings of the INTERACT and CHI Conferences on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '93. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Association for Computing Machinery. ACM ID: 169365.
19. Pirolli, P. and Card, S. (2005). The Sensemaking Process and Leverage Points for Analyst Technology as Identified Through Cognitive Task Analysis. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligence Analysis, vol. 1. VA: MacLean, pp. 2-4. http://vadl.cc.gatech.edu/documents/2__card-sensemaking.pdf (accessed 25 November 2012).
20. Plaisant, C., Rose, J., Yu, B. et al. (2006). Exploring Erotics in Emily Dickinson's Correspondence with Text Mining and Visual Interfaces. Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, DL '06. Chapel Hill, NC: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 141-50. http://portal.acm.org/citation. cfm?id=1141753.1141781&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE &CFID =110891787&CFTOKEN=59289750 (accessed 27 January 2012).
21. Rockwell, G. (2003). What is text analysis, really?. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 18(2): 209-19.
22. Rockwell, G., Sinclair, S.G., Ruecker, S., and Organisciak, P. (2010). Ubiquitous text analysis. Poetess Archive Journal, 2(1): 1-19.
23. Russell, D.M., Stefik, M.J., Pirolli, P., and Card, S.K. (1993). The Cost Structure of Sensemaking. Proceedings of the INTERACT and CHI Conferences on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '93. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Association for Computing Machinery.
24. Ruthven, I. and Lalmas, M. (2003). A survey on the use of relevance feedback for information access systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 18(02): 95-145.
25. TEI Consortium. (2011). Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange. http://www.tei-c.org/P5 (accessed 27 January 2012).
26. Unsworth, J. and Mueller, M. (2009). The MONK Project. http://monkproject.org/ (accessed 14 January 2012).
27. Vuillemot, R., Clement, T., Plaisant, C., and Kumar, A. (2009). What's Being Said Near Martha? Exploring Name Entities in Literary Text Collections. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology. Atlantic City, NJ: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 107-14.
28. Wattenberg, M. and Viegas, F.B. (2008). The word tree, an interactive visual concordance. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14(6): 1221-8.