Topic model diagnostics: Assessing domain relevance via topical alignment

30th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2013

Volumn , Issue PART 2, 2013, Pages 1649-1657

  Chuang, Jason ^a   Gupta, Sonal ^a   Manning, Christopher D ^a   Heer, Jeffrey ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

DOMAIN CONCEPTS; DOMAIN SPECIFIC; INFERENCE ALGORITHM; MODEL PARAMETERS; REFERENCE CONCEPTS; TOPIC MODEL; TOPIC MODELING;

INFERENCE ENGINES;

EID: 84897492517     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Alsumait, Loulwah, Barbará, Daniel, Gentle, James, and Domeniconi, Carlotta. Topic significance ranking of LDA generative models. In ECML, pp. 67-82, 2009.
2. Blei, David M. and Lafferty, John D. Dynamic topic models. In ICML, pp. 113-120, 2006.
3. Blei, David M., Ng, Andrew Y., and Jordan, Michael I. Latent Dirichlet allocation. J of Machine Learning Research, 3(1):993-1022, 2003.
4. Blei, David M., Griffiths, Thomas L., Jordan, Michael I., and Tenenbaum, Joshua B. Hierarchical topic models and the nested Chinese restaurant process. In NIPS, 2004.
5. Budiu, Raluca, Royer, Christiaan, and Pirolli, Peter. Modeling information scent: a comparison of LSA, PMI and GLSA similarity measures on common tests and corpora. In RIAO, pp. 314-332, 2007.
6. Chaney, Allison and Blei, David. Visualizing topic models. In AAAI, pp. 419-422, 2012.
7. Chang, Jonathan, Boyd-Graber, Jordan, Wang, Chong, Gerrish, Sean, and Blei, David M. Reading tea leaves: How humans interpret topic models. In NIPS, 2009.
8. Chuang, Jason, Manning, Christopher D., and Heer, Jeffrey. Termite: Visualization techniques for assessing textual topic models. In AVI, pp. 74-77, 2012a.
9. Chuang, Jason, Ramage, Daniel, Manning, Christopher D., and Heer, Jeffrey. Interpretation and trust: Designing model-driven visualizations for text analysis. In CHI, pp. 443-452, 2012b.
10. Gretarsson, Brynjar, O'Donovan, John, Bostandjiev, Svetlin, Höllerer, Tobias, Asuncion, Arthur, Newman, David, and Smyth, Padhraic. TopicNets: Visual analysis of large text corpora with topic modeling. ACM Trans on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 3(2):23:1-23:26, 2012.
11. Hall, David, Jurafsky, Daniel, and Manning, Christopher D. Studying the history of ideas using topic models. In EMNLP, pp. 363-371, 2008.
12. Hu, Yuening, Boyd-Graber, Jordan, and Satinoff, Brianna. Interactive topic modeling. In ACL-HLT, 2011.
13. Johnson, K. E. and Mervis, C. B. Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization. J of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(3):248-277, 1997. (Pubitemid 127458050)
14. McCallum, Andrew Kachites. MALLET: A machine learning for language toolkit. http://mallet.cs.umass.edu, 2013. Accessed 2013.
15. Mimno, David, Wallach, Hanna, Talley, Edmund, Leenders, Miriam, and McCallum, Andrew. Optimizing semantic coherence in topic models. In EMNLP, 2011.
16. Musat, Claudiu Cristian, Velcin, Julien, Trausan-Matu, Stefan, and Rizoiu, Marian-Andrei. Improving topic evaluation using conceptual knowledge. In IJCAI, 2011.
17. Newman, David, Chemudugunta, Chaitanya, Smyth, Padhraic, and Steyvers, Mark. Analyzing entities and topics in news articles using statistical topic models. In ISI, pp. 93-104, 2006.
18. Newman, David, Lau, Jey Han, Grieser, Karl, and Baldwin, Timothy. Automatic evaluation of topic coherence. In HLT, pp. 100-108, 2010a.
19. Newman, David, Noh, Youn, Talley, Edmund, Karimi, Sarvnaz, and Baldwin, Timothy. Evaluating topic models for digital libraries. In JCDL, pp. 215-224, 2010b.
20. Ramage, Daniel. Stanford topic modeling toolbox 0.4. http://nlp.stanford. edu/software/tmt, 2013. Accessed 2013.
21. Ramage, Daniel, Hall, David, Nallapati, Ramesh, and Manning, Christopher D. Labeled LDA: A supervised topic model for credit attribution in multi-label corpora. In EMNLP, pp. 248-256, 2009.
22. Ramage, Daniel, Dumais, S., and Liebling, D. Characterizing microblogs with topic models. In ICWSM, pp. 130-137, 2010.
23. Ramage, Daniel, Manning, Christopher D., and Dumais, Susan. Partially labeled topic models for interpretable text mining. In KDD, pp. 457-465, 2011.
24. Rosen-Zvi, Michal, Griffiths, Thomas, Steyvers, Mark, and Smyth, Padhraic. The author-topic model for authors and documents. In UAI, pp. 487-494, 2004.
25. Stevens, Keith, Kegelmeyer, Philip, Andrzejewski, David, and Buttler, David. Exploring topic coherence over many models and many topics. In EMNLP-CoNLL, pp. 952-961, 2012.
26. Steyvers, M., Smyth, P., Rosen-Zvi, M., and Griffiths, T. Probabilistic author-topic models for information discovery. In KDD, 2004.
27. Steyvers, Mark and Griffiths, Tom. Matlab topic modeling toolbox 1.4. http://psiexp.ss.uci.edu/research/programs-data/toolbox.htm, 2013. Accessed 2013.
28. Talley, Edmund M., Newman, David, Mimno, David, Herr, Bruce W., Wallach, Hanna M., Burns, Gully A. P. C., Leenders, A. G. Miriam, and McCallum, Andrew. Database of NIH grants using machine-learned categories and graphical clustering. Nature Methods, 8(6):443-444, 2011.
29. Titov, Ivan and McDonald, Ryan. A joint model of text and aspect ratings for sentiment summarization. In ACL-HLT, pp. 308-316, 2008.
30. Wallach, Hanna M., Mimno, David, and McCallum, Andrew. Rethinking LDA: Why priors matter. In NIPS, 2009a.
31. Wallach, Hanna M., Murray, Iain, Salakhutdinov, Ruslan, and Mimno, David. Evaluation methods for topic models. In ICML, pp. 1105-1112, 2009b.
32. Wang, Xuerui and McCallum, Andrew. Topics over time: A non-Markov continuous-time model of topical trends. In KDD, pp. 424-433, 2006.
33. Wei, Xing and Croft, W. Bruce. Lda-based document models for ad-hoc retrieval. In SIGIR, pp. 178-185, 2006.