Cardiovascular screening to reduce the burden from cardiovascular disease: Microsimulation study to quantify policy options

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 353, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Kypridemos, Chris ^a   Allen, Kirk ^a,b   Hickey, Graeme L ^a   Guzman Castillo, Maria ^a   Bandosz, Piotr ^a,c   Buchan, Iain ^d   Capewell, Simon ^a   O'Flaherty, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GDANSK   (Poland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE ASSESSMENT; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; CLINICAL STUDY; CLOSE TO REALITY SYNTHETIC POPULATION; COMBINATION OF POPULATION WIDE INTERVENTION; CONCENTRATED SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE BURDEN; ENGLAND; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MICROSTIMULATION STUDY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE HEALTH CHECKS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH PROBLEM; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SMOKING; SOCIOECONOMICS; STRUCTURAL POPULATION WIDE INTERVENTION; UNIVERSAL SCREENING; VALIDITY; VERY ELDERLY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST OF ILLNESS; EARLY INTERVENTION; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY; MANAGEMENT; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRIMARY PREVENTION; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; COST OF ILLNESS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EARLY MEDICAL INTERVENTION; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HEALTHCARE DISPARITIES; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; POLICY MAKING; PRIMARY PREVENTION; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; RISK FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 84974705184     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i2793     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and causespecific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015;385:117-71. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2
2. Townsend N, Wickramasinghe K, Bhatnagar P, et al. Coronary heart disease statistics 2012 edition. British Heart Foundation 2012. www. bhf.org.uk/publications/view-publication.aspx?ps=1002097
3. Mackenbach JP, Cavelaars AE, Kunst AE, Groenhof F. Socioeconomic inequalities in cardiovascular disease mortality; an international study. Eur Heart J 2000;21:1141-51. doi:10.1053/euhj.1999.1990
4. Department of Health. Cardiovascular disease outcomes strategy: improving outcomes for people with or at risk of cardiovascular disease. 2013. www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment-data/file/217118/9387-2900853-CVD-Outcomes-web1.pdf
5. Choices NHS. NHS Health Check. www.healthcheck.nhs.uk
6. Capewell S, McCartney M, Holland W. Invited debate: NHS Health Checks-a naked emperor? J Public Health 2015;37:187-92. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdv063
7. Waterall J, Greaves F, Kearney M, et al. Invited debate: NHS Health Check: an innovative component of local adult health improvement and well-being programmes in England. J Public Health 2015;37:177-84. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdv062
8. Braillon A, Bewley S, Pisinger C, Fisken RA, Richmond C. NHS health checks are a waste of resources. BMJ 2015;350:h1006. doi:10.1136/bmj.h1006
9. O?Dowd A. MPs call for review of NHS health checks. BMJ 2014;349:g6498-6498. doi:10.1136/bmj.g6498
10. Department of Health. Government response to the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee report on national health screening. 2015. www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-health-screening-government-response
11. He FJ, Brinsden HC, MacGregor GA. Salt reduction in the United Kingdom: a successful experiment in public health. J Hum Hypertens 2014;28:345-52. doi:10.1038/jhh.2013.105
12. Levy DT, Currie L, Clancy L. Tobacco control policy in the UK: blueprint for the rest of Europe? Eur J Public Health 2013;23:201-6. doi:10.1093/eurpub/cks090
13. Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol 2001;30:427-32, discussion 433-4. doi:10.1093/ije/30.3.427
14. Capewell S, Graham H. Will cardiovascular disease prevention widen health inequalities? PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000320. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000320
15. Krogsbøll LT, Jørgensen KJ, Grønhøj Larsen C, Gøtzsche PC. General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2012;345:e7191. doi:10.1136/bmj.e7191
16. Jørgensen T, Jacobsen RK, Toft U, Aadahl M, Glümer C, Pisinger C. Effect of screening and lifestyle counselling on incidence of ischaemic heart disease in general population: Inter99 randomised trial. BMJ 2014;348:g3617-3617. doi:10.1136/bmj.g3617
17. Manuel DG, Lim J, Tanuseputro P, et al. Revisiting Rose: strategies for reducing coronary heart disease. BMJ 2006;332:659-62. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7542.659
18. Scholes S, Bajekal M, Love H, et al. Persistent socioeconomic inequalities in cardiovascular risk factors in England over 1994-2008: a time-trend analysis of repeated cross-sectional data. BMC Public Health 2012;12:129. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-129
19. White M, Adams J, Heywood P. How and why do interventions that increase health overall widen inequalities within populations? In: Babones SJ, ed. Social inequality and public health. Policy Press, 2009: 64-81, http://policypress.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1332/policypress/9781847423207.001.0001/upso-9781847423207-chapter-5doi:10.1332/policypress/9781847423207.003.0005
20. Wallach-Kildemoes H, Diderichsen F, Krasnik A, Lange T, Andersen M. Is the high-risk strategy to prevent cardiovascular disease equitable? A pharmacoepidemiological cohort study. BMC Public Health 2012;12:610. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-610
21. Bender AM, Kawachi I, Jørgensen T, Pisinger C. Neighborhood deprivation is strongly associated with participation in a populationbased health check. PLoS One 2015;10:e0129819. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129819
22. Chang KC-M, Soljak M, Lee JT, et al. Coverage of a national cardiovascular risk assessment and management programme (NHS Health Check): Retrospective database study. Prev Med 2015;78:1-8. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.05.022
23. Gidlow C, Ellis N, Randall J, et al. Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake. J Public Health 2014;26. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdu092
24. Attwood S, Morton K, Sutton S. Exploring equity in uptake of the NHS Health Check and a nested physical activity intervention trial. J Public Health (Oxf) 2015;01:fdv070. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdv070
25. Baker C, Loughren EA, Crone D, Kallfa N. A process evaluation of the NHS Health Check care pathway in a primary care setting. J Public Health (Oxf) 2015;37:202-9. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdv053
26. Unal B, Critchley JA, Capewell S. Explaining the decline in coronary heart disease mortality in England and Wales between 1981 and 2000. Circulation 2004;109:1101-7. doi:10.1161/01. CIR.0000118498.35499.B2
27. Bajekal M, Scholes S, Love H, et al. Analysing recent socioeconomic trends in coronary heart disease mortality in England, 2000-2007: a population modelling study. PLoS Med 2012;9:e1001237. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001237
28. Ainsworth JD, Carruthers E, Couch P, et al. IMPACT: a generic tool for modelling and simulating public health policy. Methods Inf Med 2011;50:454-63. doi:10.3414/ME11-02-0006
29. Department for Communities and Local Government. English indices of deprivation 2010 -Publications -GOV.UK. 2011. www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2010
30. Mindell J, Biddulph JP, Hirani V, et al. Cohort profile: the health survey for England. Int J Epidemiol 2012;41:1585-93. doi:10.1093/ije/dyr199
31. National Centre for Social Research, University College London. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health. Health Survey for England, 2001. [computer file] 3rd ed. UK Data Archive, 2010. [distributor], 10.5255/UKDA-SN-4628-1
32. National Centre for Social Research, University College London. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health. Health Survey for England, 2002. [computer file] 2nd ed. UK Data Archive, 2010. [distributor], 10.5255/UKDA-SN-4912-1
33. National Centre for Social Research, University College London. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health. Health Survey for England, 2003. [computer file] 2nd ed. UK Data Archive, 2010. [distributor], 10.5255/UKDA-SN-5098-1
34. National Centre for Social Research, University College London. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health. Health Survey for England, 2004. [computer file] 2nd ed. UK Data Archive, 2010. [distributor], 10.5255/UKDA-SN-5439-1
35. National Centre for Social Research, University College London. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health. Health Survey for England, 2005. [computer file] 3rd ed. UK Data Archive, 2011. [distributor], 10.5255/UKDA-SN-5675-1
36. National Centre for Social Research, University College London. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health. Health Survey for England, 2006. [computer file] 4th ed. UK Data Archive, 2011. [distributor], 10.5255/UKDA-SN-5809-1
37. National Centre for Social Research, University College London. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health. Health Survey for England, 2007. [computer file] 2nd ed. UK Data Archive, 2010. [distributor], 10.5255/UKDA-SN-6112-1
38. National Centre for Social Research, University College London. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health. Health Survey for England, 2008. [computer file] 4th ed. UK Data Archive, 2013. [distributor], 10.5255/UKDA-SN-6397-2
39. National Centre for Social Research, University College London. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health. Health Survey for England, 2009. [computer file] 2nd ed. UK Data Archive, 2011. [distributor], 10.5255/UKDA-SN-6732-1
40. NatCen Social Research, Free Royal, University College London. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health. Health Survey for England, 2010. [computer file] 2nd ed. UK Data Archive, 2012. [distributor], 10.5255/UKDA-SN-6986-2
41. NatCen Social Research, University College London. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health. Health Survey for England, 2011. [computer file] UK Data Archive, 2013. [distributor], 10.5255/UKDA-SN-7260-1
42. NatCen Social Research, University College London. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health. Health Survey for England, 2012. [computer file] UK Data Archive, 2014. [distributor], 10.5255/UKDA-SN-7480-1
43. Public Health England. Explore NHS Health Check Data. www. healthcheck.nhs.uk/interactive-map
44. Collins GS, Altman DG. Predicting the 10 year risk of cardiovascular disease in the United Kingdom: independent and external validation of an updated version of QRISK2. BMJ 2012;344:e4181. doi:10.1136/bmj.e4181
45. Forster AS, Dodhia H, Booth H, et al. Estimating the yield of NHS Health Checks in England: a population-based cohort study. J Public Health (Oxf) 2015;37:234-40. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdu079
46. Wallach-Kildemoes H, Andersen M, Diderichsen F, Lange T. Adherence to preventive statin therapy according to socioeconomic position. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2013;69:1553-63. doi:10.1007/s00228-013-1488-6
47. Hutfless S, Gudzune KA, Maruthur N, et al. Strategies to prevent weight gain in adults: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2013;45:e41-51. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.07.013
48. Bauld L, Bell K, McCullough L, Richardson L, Greaves L. The effectiveness of NHS smoking cessation services: a systematic review. J Public Health (Oxf) 2010;32:71-82. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdp074
49. West R. Lesley Owen. Estimates of 52-week continuous abstinence rates following selected smoking cessation interventions in England. Smoking in England 2012. www.smokinginengland.info/downloadfile/?type=report&src=5
50. Sharma A, Hauck K, Hollingsworth B, Siciliani L. The effects of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages across different income groups. Health Econ 2014;23:1159-84. doi:10.1002/hec.3070
51. Briggs ADM, Mytton OT, Kehlbacher A, Tiffin R, Rayner M, Scarborough P. Overall and income specific effect on prevalence of overweight and obesity of 20% sugar sweetened drink tax in UK: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study. BMJ 2013;347:f6189. doi:10.1136/bmj.f6189
52. Cabrera Escobar MA, Veerman JL, Tollman SM, Bertram MY, Hofman KJ. Evidence that a tax on sugar sweetened beverages reduces the obesity rate: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2013;13:1072. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-1072
53. Webster JL, Dunford EK, Hawkes C, Neal BC. Salt reduction initiatives around the world. J Hypertens 2011;29:1043-50. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e328345ed83
54. Gillespie DOS, Allen K, Guzman-Castillo M, et al. The health equity and effectiveness of policy options to reduce dietary salt intake in England: policy forecast. PLoS One 2015;10:e0127927. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127927
55. Bartlett S, Klerman J, Olsha L, et al. Evaluation of the Healthy Incentives Pilot (HIP) Final Report. 2014. www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/HIP-Final.pdf
56. Nnoaham KE, Sacks G, Rayner M, Mytton O, Gray A. Modelling income group differences in the health and economic impacts of targeted food taxes and subsidies. Int J Epidemiol 2009;38:1324-33. doi:10.1093/ije/dyp214
57. Levy DT, Huang A-T, Currie LM, Clancy L. The benefits from complying with the framework convention on tobacco control: a SimSmoke analysis of 15 European nations. Health Policy Plan 2014;29:1031-42. doi:10.1093/heapol/czt085
58. Alfons A, Kraft S, Templ M, et al. Simulation of close-to-reality population data for household surveys with application to EU-SILC. Stat Methods Appl 2011;20:383-407. doi:10.1007/s10260-011-0163-2
59. Mackenbach JP, Kunst AE. Measuring the magnitude of socioeconomic inequalities in health: an overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe. Soc Sci Med 1997;44:757-71. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00073-1
60. Office for National Statistics. Results of the ICD-10 v2010 bridge coding study, England and Wales. 2011. www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/subnational-health3/results-of-the-icd-10-v2010-bridge-codingstudy-england-and-wales-2009/2009/index.html
61. Schmid VJ, Held L. Bayesian age-period-cohort modeling and prediction-BAMP. J Stat Softw 2007;21:1-15doi:10.18637/jss.v021.i08
62. Lorenc T, Petticrew M, Welch V, Tugwell P. What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health 2013;67:190-3. doi:10.1136/jech-2012-201257
63. McLaren L, McIntyre L, Kirkpatrick S. Rose?s population strategy of prevention need not increase social inequalities in health. Int J Epidemiol 2010;39:372-7. doi:10.1093/ije/dyp315
64. Scholes S, Bajekal M, Norman P, et al. Quantifying policy options for reducing future coronary heart disease mortality in England: a modelling study. PLoS One 2013;8:e69935. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0069935
65. Schuetz CA, Alperin P, Guda S, et al. A standardized vascular disease health check in europe: a cost-effectiveness analysis. PLoS One 2013;8:e66454. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066454
66. Bandosz P, O?Flaherty M, Drygas W, et al. Decline in mortality from coronary heart disease in Poland after socioeconomic transformation: modelling study. BMJ 2012;344:d8136. doi:10.1136/bmj.d8136
67. Franco M, Bilal U, Orduñez P, et al. Population-wide weight loss and regain in relation to diabetes burden and cardiovascular mortality in Cuba 1980-2010: repeated cross sectional surveys and ecological comparison of secular trends. BMJ 2013;346:f1515. doi:10.1136/bmj. f1515
68. Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lin JK, et al. Global Burden of Metabolic Risk Factors of Chronic Diseases Collaborating Group (Blood Pressure). National, regional, and global trends in systolic blood pressure since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 786 country-years and 5?4 million participants. Lancet 2011;377:568-77. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62036-3
69. Farzadfar F, Finucane MM, Danaei G, et al. Global Burden of Metabolic Risk Factors of Chronic Diseases Collaborating Group (Cholesterol). National, regional, and global trends in serum total cholesterol since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 321 country-years and 3?0 million participants. Lancet 2011;377:578-86. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62038-7
70. Molarius A, Parsons RW, Dobson AJ, et al. WHO MONICA Project. Trends in cigarette smoking in 36 populations from the early 1980s to the mid-1990s: findings from the WHO MONICA Project. Am J Public Health 2001;91:206-12. doi:10.2105/AJPH.91.2.206
71. Maguire ER, Monsivais P. Socio-economic dietary inequalities in UK adults: an updated picture of key food groups and nutrients from national surveillance data. Br J Nutr 2015;113:181-9. doi:10.1017/S0007114514002621
72. Barton P, Andronis L, Briggs A, McPherson K, Capewell S. Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of cardiovascular disease prevention in whole populations: modelling study. BMJ 2011;343:d4044. doi:10.1136/bmj.d4044
73. Vos T, Carter R, Barendregt J, et al. Assessing Cost-Effectiveness in Prevention.The University of Queensland, Brisbane, and Deakin University, 2010, www.sph.uq.edu.au/docs/BODCE/ACE-P/ACE-Prevention-final-report.pdf
74. Lloyd-Williams F, Bromley H, Orton L, et al. Smorgasbord or symphony? Assessing public health nutrition policies across 30 European countries using a novel framework. BMC Public Health 2014;14:1195. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1195
75. Bødker M, Pisinger C, Toft U, Jørgensen T. The rise and fall of the world?s first fat tax. Health Policy 2015;119:737-42. doi:10.1016/j. healthpol.2015.03.003
76. Leifert RM, Lucinda CR. Linear Symmetric ?Fat Taxes?: Evidence from Brazil. Appl Econ Perspect Policy 2015;37:634-66. doi:10.1093/aepp/ppu062
77. Madden D. The poverty effects of a ?fat-tax? in Ireland. Health Econ 2015;24:104-21. doi:10.1002/hec.3006
78. The Marmot Review. Fair society, healthy lives: strategic review of health inequalities in England post 2010.UCL Institute of Health Equity, 2010
79. Farr Institute. Investment in supercomputer accelerates the pace of health research across the North of England. www.farrinstitute.org/news/investment-in-supercomputer-accelerates-the-pace-of-health-researchacross-the-north-of-england
80. World Health Organization. Comparative quantification of health risks. WHO, 2004. www.who.int/healthinfo/global-burden-disease/cra/en