Piezoelectric material selection for transducers under fuzzy environment

Journal of Advanced Ceramics

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 141-148

  Vats, Gaurav ^a   Vaish, Rahul ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MANDI   (India)

Author keywords

fuzzy approach; MADM; piezoceramics; selection; transducer application

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DIELECTRIC LOSSES; ELECTROMECHANICAL COUPLING; PIEZOELECTRIC CERAMICS; PIEZOELECTRIC MATERIALS; TRANSDUCERS;

ELECTROMECHANICAL COUPLING FACTOR (KP); FABRICATION PROCESS; FUZZY APPROACH; MADM; MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING; PIEZO-CERAMICS; PIEZOELECTRIC CHARGE COEFFICIENT; SELECTION;

PIEZOELECTRICITY;

EID: 84974623330     PISSN: 22264108     EISSN: 22278508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40145-013-0053-1     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Shrout TR, Zhang SJ. Lead-free piezoelectric ceramics: Alternatives for PZT? J Electroceram 2007, 19: 111–124.
2. Haertling GH. Ferroelectric ceramics: History and technology. J Am Ceram Soc 1999, 82: 797–818.
3. Rödel J, Klaus WJ, Seifert TP, et al. Perspective on the development of lead-free piezoceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 2009, 92: 1153–1177.
4. Xiao DQ, Lin DM, Zhu JG, et al. Studies on new systems of BNT-based lead-free piezoelectric ceramics. J Electroceram 2008, 21: 34–38.
5. Lau ST, Cheng CH, Choy SH, et al. Lead-free ceramics for pyroelectric applications. J Appl Phys 2008, 103: 104105.
6. Saito Y, Takao H, Tani T, et al. Lead-free piezoceramics. Nature 2004, 432: 84–87.
7. Damjanovic D, Klein N, Li J, et al. What can be expected from lead-free piezoelectric materials? Funct Mater Lett 2010, 3: 5–13.
8. Sen P, Yang JB. Multiple Criteria Decision Support in Engineering Design. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1998.
9. Saaty TL. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 1990, 48: 9–26.
10. Rao RV. A material selection model using graph theory and matrix approach. Mat Sci Eng A 2006, 431: 248–255.
11. Opricovic S, Tzeng GH. Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Eur J Oper Res 2007, 178: 514–529.
12. Deng H, Yeh CH, Willis RJ. Inter-company comparison using TOPSIS with objective weights. Comput Oper Res 2000, 27: 963–973.
13. Vaish R. Piezoelectric and pyroelectric materials selection. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2012.02765.x.
14. Chauhan A, Vaish R. Magnetic material selection using multiple attribute decision making approach. Mater Design 2012, 36: 1–5.
15. Chauhan A, Vaish R. A comparative study on material selection for micro-electromechanical systems. Mater Design 2012, 41: 177–181.
16. Chauhan A, Vaish R. Hard coating material selection using multi-criteria decision making. Mater Design 2013, 44: 240–245.
17. Girubha RJ, Vinodh S. Application of fuzzy VIKOR and environmental impact analysis for material selection of an automotive component. Mater Design 2012, 37: 478–486.
18. Shemshadi A, Shirazi H, Toreihi M, et al. A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Expert Syst Appl 2011, 38: 12160–12167.
19. Opricovic S. Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning. Expert Syst Appl 2011, 38: 12983–12990.
20. Devi K. Extension of VIKOR method in intuitionistic fuzzy environment for robot selection. Expert Syst Appl 2011, 38: 14163–14168.
21. Kaya T, Kahraman C. Fuzzy multiple criteria forestry decision making based on an integrated VIKOR and AHP approach. Expert Syst Appl 2011, 38: 7326–7333.
22. Chatterjee P, Athawale VM, Chakraborty S. Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods. Mater Design 2009, 30: 4043–4053.
23. Kuo MS, Liang GS. Combining VIKOR with GRA techniques to evaluate service quality of airports under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 2011, 38: 1304–1312.
24. 3 lead-free piezoelectric ceramics. J Electroceram 2005, 15: 229–235.
25. Jaeger RE, Egerton L. Hot pressing of potassium-sodium niobates. J Am Ceram Soc 1962, 45: 209–213.
26. Haertling GH. Properties of hot-pressed ferroelectric alkali niobate ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 1967, 50: 329–330.
27. Park SE, Shrout TR. Characteristics of relaxor-based piezoelectric single crystals for ultrasonic transducers. IEEE T Ultrason Ferr 1997, 44: 1140–1147
28. 3 (NBT-KBT) system: A structural and electrical study. Phys Status Solidi a 1996, 157: 499–506.
29. 3 ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 2007, 90: 2424–2428.
30. 3 ceramics. Appl Phys Lett 2004, 85: 4121.
31. 3 lead-free piezoelectric ceramics. Mater Lett 2005, 59: 241–244.
32. 3 ceramics. Sensor Actuat A: Phys 2007, 136: 255–260.
33. Egerton L, Dillon DM. Piezoelectric and dielectric properties of ceramics in the system potassium-sodium niobate. J Am Ceram Soc 1959, 42: 438–442.
34. 3 ceramics. Appl Phys Lett 2005, 87: 182905.
35. Jaffe H. Piezoelectric ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 1958, 41: 494–498.
36. 3 lead-free piezoceramics. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 88: 212908.
37. Jaffe H, Berlincourt DA. Piezoelectric transducer materials. Proc IEEE 1965, 53: 1372–1386.
38. Schofield D, Brown RF. An investigation of some barium titanate compositions for transducer applications. Can J Phys 1957, 35: 594–607.
39. 3 ceramics. Jpn J Appl Phys 2006, 45: 831–834.
40. 3 lead-free piezoelectric ceramics. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 88: 062901.
41. 3 solid solution system. Ferroelectrics 2006, 338: 17–32.
42. Tressler JF, Alkoy S, Newnham RE. Piezoelectric sensors and sensor materials. J Electroceram 1998, 2: 257–272.
43. 3 lead-free piezoceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 2007, 90: 120–124.
44. 3-solid solution system. J Electroceram 2007, 18: 339–346.
45. Dehgan-Manshadi B, Mahmudi H, Abedian A, et al. A novel method for material selection in mechanical design: Combination of non-linear normalization and a modified digital logic method. Mater Design 2007, 28: 8–15.
46. 3 solid solution system. IEEE T Ultrason Ferr 2008, 55: 214–224.