Trends in Approval Times for Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States and the European Union

Journal of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 182-198

  Smart, Richard D ^a   Blum, Matthias ^b   Wesseler, Justus ^c  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Authorisation; EU; GE; genetically modified organism (GMO); regulatory oversight; transgenic; US

Indexed keywords

AUTHORITARIANISM; CROP; EUROPEAN UNION; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

EUROPE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84973897653     PISSN: 0021857X     EISSN: 14779552     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12171     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Agrafacts (2015). Available at: http://www.agrafacts.com/Home.html (last accessed 07 July 2015).
2. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). ‘Environmental impact statement: Introduction of the products of biotechnology’, Federal Register, Vol. 81, (2016) pp. 6225–6229.
3. Bauer, M. W. ‘Controversial medical and agri-food biotechnology: A cultivation analysis’, Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 11, (2002) pp. 93–111.
4. Bayer, J. C., Norton, G. W. and Falck-Zepeda, J. B. ‘Cost of compliance with biotechnology regulation in the Philippines: Implications for developing countries’, AgBioForum, Vol. 13, (2010) pp. 53–62.
5. Benbrook, C. M. ‘Impacts of genetically engineered crops on pesticide use in the US – the first sixteen years’, Environmental Sciences Europe, Vol. 24, (2012) pp. 1–13.
6. Bennett, A. B., Chi-Ham, C., Barrows, G., Sexton, S. and Zilberman, D. ‘Agricultural biotechnology: Economics, environment, ethics, and the future’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Vol. 38, (2013) pp. 249–279.
7. Bonneuil, C., Joly, P.-B. and Marris, C. ‘Disentrenching experiment: The construction of GM crop field trials as a social problem’, Science, Technology, and Human Values, Vol. 33, (2008) pp. 201–229.
8. Bradford, K. J., Van Deynze, A., Gutterson, N., Parrott, W. and Strauss, S. H. ‘Regulating transgenic crops sensibly: Lessons from plant breeding, biotechnology and genomics’, Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 23, (2005) pp. 439–444.
9. Brookes, G. and Barfoot, P. GM Crops: Global Socio-economic and Environmental Impacts 1996–2012 (Dorchester, UK, 2014). Available at: http://www.pgeconomics.co.uk/ (last accessed 07 July 2015).
10. Capital Reporting Company. Biotechnology Regulatory Services, Public Stakeholder Meeting 12-13-2011 (USDA Center, Riverdale, MD, 2011). Available at: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/downloads/Meetings/brs_public_stakeholder_mtg_121311.pdf (last accessed 06 July 2015).
11. Cararu, J. G. ‘Lack of Sherpas for a GMO escape route in the EU’, German Law Journal, Vol. 10, (2009) pp. 1169–1199.
12. Carter, C. A. and Smith, A. ‘Estimating the market effect of a food scare: The case of genetically modified StarLink corn’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 89, (2007) pp. 522–533.
13. Davison, J. ‘GM plants: Science, politics and EC regulations’, Plant Science, Vol. 178, (2010) pp. 94–98.
14. De Steur, H., Blancquaert, D., Strobbe, S., Lambert, W., Gellynck, X. and Van Der Straeten, D. ‘Status and market potential of transgenic biofortified crops’, Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 33, (2015) pp. 25–29.
15. Dederer, H. ‘The challenge of regulating genetically modified organisms in the European Union: Trends and issues’, in Y. Nakanishi (ed.), Contemporary Issues in Environmental Law. Environmental Protection in the European Union 5, The EU and Japan (Tokyo, Japan: Springer, 2016, pp. 139–168).
16. DeFrancesco, L. ‘US Congress moves to “protect” GM crop plantings’, Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 31, (2013) p. 479.
17. Devos, Y., Reheul, D., De Waele, D. and Van Speybroeck, L. ‘The interplay between societal concerns and the regulatory frame on GM crops in the European Union’, Environmental Biosafety Research, Vol. 5, (2006) pp. 127–149.
18. EFSA. Genetically Modified Organisms (Parma, Italy: EFSA, 2015). Available at: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/gmo (last accessed 06 April 2015).
19. European Commission. ‘Council Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC’, Official Journal of the European Communities, Vol. L 106, (2001) pp. 1–38.
20. European Commission. ‘Council Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety’, Official Journal of the European Communities, Vol. L 31, (2002) pp. 1–24.
21. European Commission. ‘Directive (EU) 2015/412 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 amending Directive 2001/18/EC as regards the possibility for the Member States to restrict or prohibit the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in their territory’, Official Journal of the European Communities, Vol. L 68, (2015a) pp. 1–8.
22. European Commission. Comitology committees Appeal Committee (2015b). Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_food-safety/dgs_consultations/regulatory_committees_en.htm (last accessed 06 April 2015).
23. European Commission. GMO authorisations for cultivation (2016). Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/gmo/authorisation/cultivation/index_en.htm (last accessed 08 February 2016).
24. de Faria, R. N. and Wieck, C. ‘Empirical evidence on the trade impact of asynchronous regulatory approval of new GMO events’, Food Policy, Vol. 53, (2015) pp. 22–32.
25. Federation of American Scientists. Case Studies in Agricultural Biosecurity The Prodigene Incident (FAS, Washington, USA, 2011). Available at: http://www.fas.org/biosecurity/education/dualuse-agriculture/2.-agricultural-biotechnology/prodigene-incident.html (last accessed 06 April 2015).
26. Giddings, L. V., Stepp, M. and Caine, M. Feeding the Planet in a Warming World: Building Resilient Agriculture Through Innovation (The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation and The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, 2013). Available at: http://www2.itif.org/2013-feeding-planet-warming-world.pdf (last accessed 06 July 2015).
27. GMO Compass. GMO Database (Darmstadt, Germany, 2016). Available at: http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/gmo/db/ (last accessed 08 February 2016).
28. Graff, G. D., Zilberman, D. and Bennett, A. B. ‘The contraction of agbiotech product quality innovation’, Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 8, (2009) pp. 702–704.
29. Henseler, M., Piot-Lepetit, I., Ferrari, E., Mellado, A. G., Banse, M., Grethe, H., Parisi, C. and Hélaine, S. ‘On the asynchronous approvals of GM crops: Potential market impacts of a trade disruption of EU soy imports’, Food Policy, Vol. 41, (2013) pp. 166–176.
30. House of Commons. Advanced Genetic Techniques For Crop Improvement: Regulation, Risk and Precaution (House of Commons, London: Science and Technology Committee, Fifth Report of Session 2014–15, HC 328, 2015). Available at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmsctech/328/328.pdf (last accessed 15 February 2016).
31. Kalaitzandonakes, N., Alston, J. M. and Bradford, K. J. ‘Compliance costs for regulatory approval of new biotech crops’, Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 25, (2007) pp. 509–511.
32. Klümper, W. and Qaim, M. ‘A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops’, PLoS ONE, Vol. 9, (2014) pp. e111629.
33. Lynch, D. and Vogel, D. The Regulation of GMOs in Europe and the United States: A Case-Study of Contemporary European Regulatory Politics (New York, USA, Council on Foreign Relations, 2001). Available at: http://www.cfr.org/agricultural-policy/regulation-gmos-europe-united-states-case-study-contemporary-european-regulatory-politics/p8688 (last accessed 27 April 2015).
34. Mannion, A. M. and Morse, S. GM Crops 1996–2012: A Review of Agronomic, Environmental and Socio-economic Impacts, Working Paper No. 04/13 / Geographical Paper No. 195 (University of Surrey, Centre for Environmental Strategy (CES)/University of Reading, 2013). Available at: https://www.surrey.ac.uk/ces/files/pdf/04-13%20Morse_Mannion_GM%20Crops.pdf (last accessed 07 July 2015).
35. Miller, J. K. and Bradford, K. J. ‘The regulatory bottleneck for biotech specialty crops’, Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 28, (2010) pp. 1012–1014.
36. Morris, S. and Spillane, C. ‘EU GM crop regulation: A road to resolution or a regulatory roundabout?’, European Journal of Risk Regulation, Vol. 4, (2010) pp. 359–369.
37. Nowicki, P., Aramyan, L., Baltussen, W., Dvortsin, L., Jongeneel, R., Pérez Domínguez, I., vanWagenberg, C., Kalaitzandonakes, N., Kaufman, J., Miller, D., Franke, L. and Meerbeek, B. Study on the Implications of Asynchronous GMO Approvals for EU Imports of Animal Feed Products, Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission, Final Report (Contract No. 30-CE-0317175/00-74) (EC: Brussels, 2010).
38. Office of Science and Technology Policy. ‘Coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology products’, Federal Register, Vol. 51, (1986) p. 23302. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/biotech_rule/pubs/pdf/coordinated-framework-1986.pdf (last accessed 07 July 2015).
39. Office of Science and Technology Policy. Modernizing the Regulatory System for Biotechnology Products, Memorandum for Heads of Food and Drug Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, and Department of Agriculture (Executive Office of the President of the United States, 2015). Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/modernizing_the_reg_system_for_biotech_products_memo_final.pdf (last accessed 10 July 2015).
40. Phillips McDougall. The Cost and Time Involved in the Discovery, Development and Authorisation of a New Plant Biotechnology Derived Trait (A Consultancy Study for Crop Life International, Pathhead, UK, 2011). Available at: https://croplife.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Getting-a-Biotech-Crop-to-Market-Phillips-McDougall-Study.pdf (last accessed: 8 February 2016).
41. Pray, C. E., Bengali, P. and Ramaswami, B. ‘The cost of biosafety regulations: The Indian experience’, Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Vol. 44, (2005) pp. 267–289.
42. Punt, M. and Wesseler, J. ‘Legal but costly: An analysis of the EU GM regulation in the light of the WTO trade dispute between the EU and the US’, World Economy, Vol. 39, (2016) pp. 158–169.
43. Smart, R. D., Blum, M. and Wesseler, J. ‘EU Member States’ voting for authorizing genetically engineered crops: A regulatory gridlock’, German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 64, (2015) pp. 242–262.
44. Stein, A. J. and Rodríguez-Cerezo, E. International Trade and the Global Pipeline of New GM Crops. Implications of Asynchronous Approval for International Trade (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2009).
45. The European Association for Bioindustries. Approvals of GMOs in the European Union (EuropaBio, Brussels, Belgium, 2011). Available at: http://www.europabio.org/sites/default/files/approvals_of_gmos_in_eu_europabio_report.pdf (last accessed 28 May 2015).
46. USDA. Petitions for Determination of Nonregulated Status (USDA, Riverdale, USA, 2016a). Available at: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/petitions_table_pending.shtml (last accessed 08 February 2015).
47. USDA. Check Status (USDA, Riverdale, USA, 2016b). Available at: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/biotechnology/sa_permits_notifications_and_petitions/sa_permits/ct_status (last accessed 08 February 2016).
48. USDA APHIS. Monsanto Company and KWS SAAT AG; Supplemental Request for Partial Deregulation of Roundup Ready Sugar Beet, 75 FR 62365 (USDA APHIS, Riverdale, USA, 2010). Available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-10-08/pdf/2010-25387.pdf (last accessed 06 April 2015).
49. USDA APHIS. Determination of Regulated Status of Alfalfa Genetically Engineered for Tolerance to the Herbicide Glyphosate; Record of Decision, 76 FR 5780 (USDA APHIS, Riverdale, USA, 2011). Available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-02-02/pdf/2011-2268.pdf (last accessed 06 April 2015).
50. USDA APHIS. Changes Regarding the Solicitation of Public Comment for Petitions for Determinations of Nonregulated Status for Genetically Engineered Organisms, 77 FR 13258 (USDA APHIS, Riverdale, USA, 2012). Available at: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/fedregister/BRS_20120306.pdf (last accessed 06 April 2015).
51. Vigani, M. and Olper, O. ‘GMO standards, endogenous policy and the market for information’, Food Policy, Vol. 43, (2013) pp. 32–43.
52. Vigani, M. and Olper, O. ‘Patterns and determinants of GMO regulations: An overview of recent evidence’, AgBioForum, Vol. 18, (2015) pp. 44–54.
53. Vigani, M., Raimondi, V. and Olper, A. ‘International trade and endogenous standards: The case of GMO regulations’, World Trade Review, Vol. 11, (2012) pp. 415–437.
54. Wesseler, J. and Kalaitzandonakes, N. ‘Present and future EU GMO policy’, in A. Oskam, G. Meesters and H. Silvis (eds.), EU Policy for Agriculture, Food and Rural Areas, 2nd edn (Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2011, pp. 323–332).
55. Wesseler, J. and Zilberman, D. ‘The economic power of the Golden Rice opposition’, Environment and Development Economics, Vol. 19, (2014) pp. 724–742.
56. Wesseler, J., Scatasta, S. and Fall, E. ‘Environmental benefits and costs of GM crops’, in C. Carter, G. Moschini and I. Sheldon (eds.), Genetically Modified Food and Global Welfare (Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing, 2011, pp. 173–199).
57. Zilberman, D., Kaplan, S. and Wesseler, J. ‘The loss from underutilizing GM technologies’, AgBioForum, Vol. 18, (2015) pp. 312–319.