Effect of injector parameters on the injection quantity of common rail injection system for diesel engines

International Journal of Automotive Technology

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 567-579

  Bai, Y ^a   Fan, L Y ^a   Ma, X Z ^a   Peng, H L ^a   Song, E Z ^a  

^a HARBIN ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bond graph; Common rail injection system; Injector; Interactive effect; Response surface

Indexed keywords

EQUATIONS OF STATE; FUEL INJECTION; FUELS; GRAPH THEORY; MATLAB; NEEDLES; NOZZLES; ORIFICES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

BOND GRAPH; COMMON RAIL INJECTION SYSTEM; INJECTOR; INTERACTIVE EFFECT; RESPONSE SURFACE;

DIESEL ENGINES;

EID: 84973473462     PISSN: 12299138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12239-016-0057-2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bera, T. K., Samantaray, A. K. and Karmakar, R. (2012). Bond graph modeling of planar prismatic joints. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 49, 2–20.
2. Boehman, A. L., Morris, D. and Szybist, J. (2004). The impact of the bulk modulus of diesel fuels on fuel injection timing. Energy Fuels 18, 6, 1877–1882.
3. Boudy, F. and Seers, P. (2009). Impact of physical properties of biodiesel on the injection process in a common-rail direct injection system. Energy Conversion and Management 50, 12, 2905–2912.
4. Caika, V. and Sampl, P. (2011). Nozzle flow and cavitation modeling with coupled 1D-3D AVL software tools. SAE Paper No. 2011–24-0006.
5. Catania, A. E., Ferrari, A. and Spessa, E. (2008). Numericalexperimental study and solutions to reduce the dwelltime threshold for fusion-free consecutive injections in a multijet solenoid-type CR system. J. Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 131, 2, 022804.
6. Chung, N.-H., Oh, B.-G. and Sunwoo, M.-H. (2008). Modelling and injection rate estimation of common-rail injectors for direct-injection diesel engines. Proc. IMechE, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering 222, 6, 1089–1101.
7. Coppo, M. and Dongiovanni, C. (2006). Experimental validation of a common-rail injector model in the whole operation field. J. Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 129, 2, 596–608.
8. Ferrari, A., Mittica, A. and Spessa, E. (2013). Benefits of hydraulic layout over driving system in piezo-injectors and proposal of a new-concept CR injector with an integrated Minirail. Applied Energy, 103, 243–255.
9. Gamez-Montero, P. J. and Codina, E. (2007). Flow characteristics of a trochoidal-gear pump using bond graphs and experimental measurement. Part 2. Proc. IMechE, Part I: J. Systems and Control Engineering 221, 3, 347–363.
10. Groen, O. and Kok, D. (1996). Rechenprogramm zur Simulation von Hochdruckeinspritzsystemen für Nutzfahrzeuge. MTZ 57, 1, 6–15.
11. Hardenberg, H. (1984). Die Geometrischen Strömungsquerschnitte von Lochdüsen für Direkteinspritzmotoren. MTZ 45, 10, 427–429.
12. Hardenberg, H. (1985). Die Nadelhubabhängigkeit der Durchflußbeiwerte von Lochdüsen für Direkteinspritzdieselmotoren. MTZ 46, 4, 143–146.
13. Hirkude, J. B. and Padalkar, A. S. (2014). Performance optimization of CI engine fuelled with waste fried oil methyl ester-diesel blend using response surface methodology. Fuel, 119, 266–273.
14. Jeong, J. H., Jung, D. W., Lim, O. T., Pyo, Y. D. and Lee, Y. J. (2014). Influence of pilot injection on combustion characteristics and emissions in a DI diesel engine fueled with diesel and DME. Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 6, 861–869.
15. Jo, I. S., Chung, M. C., Kim, S. M., Sung, G. S. and Lee, J. W. (2015). Experimental investigation and hydraulic simulation of dynamic effects on diesel injection characteristics in indirect acting piezo-driven injector with bypass-circuit system. Int. J. Automotive Technology 16, 2, 173–182.
16. Kannan, G. R., Balasubramanian, K. R. and Anand, R. (2013). Artificial neural network approach to study the effect of injection pressure and timing on diesel engine performance fueled with biodiesel. Int. J. Automotive Technology 14, 4, 507–519.
17. Kurniawan, A., Pedersen, E. and Moan, T. (2012). Bond graph modelling of a wave energy conversion system with hydraulic power take-off. Renewable Energy 38, 1, 234–244.
18. Lee, J.-H. and Lee, Y.-Z. (2015). Diesel cold flow evaluation using design of experiment. Int. J. Automotive Technology 16, 3, 471–478.
19. Nikolic, B. D., Kegl, B., Markovic, S. D. and Mitrovic, M. S. (2012). Determining the speed of sound, density and bulk modulus of rapeseed oil, biodiesel and diesel fuel. Thermal Science 16, 2, 505–514.
20. Nikzadfar, K. and Shamekhi, A. H. (2014). Investigation the relative contribution of operational parameters on performance and emissions of a common-rail diesel engine using neural network. Fuel, 125, 116–128.
21. Payri, R., Salvador, F. J., Martí-Aldaraví, P. and Martínez-López, J. (2012). Using one-dimensional modeling to analyse the influence of the use of biodiesels on the dynamic behavior of solenoid-operated injectors in common rail systems: Detailed injection system model. Energy Conversion and Management 54, 1, 90–99.
22. Qian, D. and Liao, R. (2015). Theoretical analysis and mathematical modeling of a high-pressure pump in the common rail injection system for diesel engines. Proc. IMechE, Part A: J. Power and Energy 229, 1, 60–72.
23. Rosenberg, R. C. (1971). State-space formulation for bond graph models of multiport systems. J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 93, 1, 35–40.
24. Tat, M. E. and Gerpen, J. V. (2003). Effect of temperature and pressure on the speed of sound and isentropic bulk modulus of mixtures of biodiesel and diesel fuel. J. American Oil Chemists’ Society 80, 11, 1127–1130.
25. Wang, F., He, Z., Liu, J. and Wang, Q. (2015). Diesel nozzle geometries on spray characteristics with a spray model coupled with nozzle cavitating flow. Int. J. Automotive Technology 16, 4, 539–549.