Computing the Internode Certainty and Related Measures from Partial Gene Trees

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1606-1617

  Kobert, Kassian ^a   Salichos, Leonidas ^b,c   Rokas, Antonis ^c,d   Stamatakis, Alexandros ^a,e  

^a HEIDELBERG INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL STUDIES   (Germany)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bipartition frequencies; Clade support; Gene trees; Internode certainty

Indexed keywords

CALCULATION; CLADISTICS; INTERNODE; SPECIES; TAXON; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PROCEDURES;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 84973324653     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msw040     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bryant D. 2003. A classification of consensusmethods for phylogenies. In: Janowitz M, Lapointe F-J, McMorris F, Mirkin B, Roberts F, editors. Bioconsensus, DIMACS. AMS, p. 163-184
2. Dujon B. 2010. Yeast evolutionary genomics. Nat Rev Genet. 11(7):512-524
3. Efron B, Halloran E, Holmes S. 1996. Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetictrees. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 93(23):13429-13434
4. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Ann Stat. 39:783-791
5. Fitzpatrick D, Logue M, Stajich J, Butler G. 2006. A fungal phylogeny based on 42 complete genomes derived from supertree and combined gene analysis. BMC Evol Biol. 6(1):99
6. Garey MR, Johnson DS. 1990. Computers and intractability; a guide to the theory of NP-completeness. New York: W. H. Freeman &Co
7. Hejnol A, Obst M, Stamatakis A, Ott M, Rouse GW, Edgecombe GD, Martinez P, Baguná J, Bailly X, Jondelius U, et al. 2009. Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomicmethods. Proc R Soc Lond B: Biol Sci. 276:4261-4270
8. Jarvis E, Mirarab S, Aberer A, Li B, Houde P, Li C, Ho S, Faircloth B, Nabholz B, Howard J, et al. 2015. Phylogenomic analyses data of the avian phylogenomics project. GigaScience 4(1):4
9. Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships among yeasts of the 'Saccharomyces complex' determined from multigene sequence analyses. FEMS Yeast Res. 3(4):417-432
10. Phillips C, Warnow TJ. 1996. The asymmetric median tree a new model for building consensus trees. Disc Appl Math. 71(13): 311-335
11. Rokas A,Williams BL, King N, Carroll SB. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425(6960): 798-804
12. Salichos L, Rokas A. 2013. Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals. Nature 497:327-331
13. Salichos L, Stamatakis A, Rokas A. 2014. Novel information theory-based measures for quantifying incongruence among phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 31:1261-1271
14. Shannon CE. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27:379-423
15. Smith S, Moore M, Brown J, Yang Y. 2015. Analysis of phylogenomic datasets reveals conflict, concordance, and gene duplications with examples from animals and plants. BMC Evol Biol. 15(1):150
16. Stamatakis A. 2014. Raxml version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312-1313