Looking beyond the mountain: Dispersal barriers in a changing world

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 261-268

  Caplat, Paul ^a   Edelaar, Pim ^b   Dudaniec, Rachael Y ^c   Green, Andy J ^d   Okamura, Beth ^e   Cote, Julien ^f,g   Ekroos, Johan ^a   Jonsson, Per R ^h   Löndahl, Jakob ^a   Tesson, Sylvie Vm ⁱ   Petit, Eric J ^j  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSIDAD PABLO DE OLAVIDE   (Spain)

^c MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

^e DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^f CNRS   (France)

^g UNIVERSITÉ PAUL SABATIER   (France)

^h GÖTEBORG UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^j AGROCAMPUS OUEST   (France)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONNECTIVITY; DISPERSAL; ECOSYSTEM DYNAMICS; ECOSYSTEM RESPONSE; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; GLOBAL CHANGE; MOUNTAIN REGION;

EID: 84971655161     PISSN: 15409295     EISSN: 15409309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fee.1280     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Anderson BJ, Akçakaya HR, Araújo MB, et al,. 2009. Dynamics of range margins for metapopulations under climate change. Proc R Soc B 276; doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1681.
2. Baguette M, Blanchet S, Legrand D, et al,. 2013. Individual dispersal, landscape connectivity and ecological networks. Biol Rev 88: 310-26.
3. Blair C, Weigel DE, Balazik M, et al,. 2012. A simulation-based evaluation of methods for inferring linear barriers to gene flow. Molecular Ecol Resour 12: 822-33.
4. Bocedi G, Palmer SCF, Pe'er G, et al,. 2014. RangeShifter: a platform for modelling spatial eco-evolutionary dynamics and species' responses to environmental changes. Methods Ecol Evol 5: 388-96.
5. Bonte D, Vanden Borre J, Lens L, et al,. 2006. Geographical variation in wolf spider dispersal behaviour is related to landscape structure. Anim Behav 72: 655-62.
6. Branco P, Segurado P, Santos JM, et al,. 2014. Prioritizing barrier removal to improve functional connectivity of rivers. J Appl Ecol 51: 1197-206.
7. Breckheimer I, Haddad NM, Morris WF, et al,. 2014. Defining and evaluating the umbrella species concept for conserving and restoring landscape connectivity. Conserv Biol 28: 1584-93.
8. Broquet T, and, Petit EJ,. 2009. Molecular estimation of dispersal for ecology and population genetics. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40: 193-216.
9. Burrows MT, Schoeman DS, Richardson AJ, et al,. 2014. Geographical limits to species-range shifts are suggested by climate velocity. Nature 507: 492-95.
10. Caplat P, Coutts S, and, Buckley YM,. 2012. Modeling population dynamics, landscape structure, and management decisions for controlling the spread of invasive plants. Ann NY Acad Sci 1249: 72-83.
11. Clarke A, Barnes DKA, and, Hodgson DA,. 2005. How isolated is Antarctica? Trends Ecol Evol 20: 1-3.
12. Clobert J, Le Galliard JF, Cote J, et al,. 2009. Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and the dynamics of spatially structured populations. Ecol Lett 12: 197-209.
13. Cote J, Clobert J, Brodin T, et al,. 2010. Personality-dependent dispersal: characterization, ontogeny and consequences for spatially structured populations. Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sci 365: 4065-76.
14. de la Giroday H-MC, Carroll AL, and, Aukema BH,. 2012. Breach of the northern Rocky Mountain geoclimatic barrier: initiation of range expansion by the mountain pine beetle. J Biogeogr 39: 1112-23.
15. De Meester L, Gómez A, Okamura B, et al,. 2002. The Monopolization Hypothesis and the dispersal-gene flow paradox in aquatic organisms. Acta Oecol 23: 121-35.
16. Dennis RH, Dapporto L, Dover J, et al,. 2013. Corridors and barriers in biodiversity conservation: a novel resource-based habitat perspective for butterflies. Biodivers Conserv 22: 2709-34.
17. Dirzo R, Young HS, Galetti M, et al,. 2014. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 345: 401-06.
18. Dudaniec RY, Spear SF, Richardson JS, et al,. 2012. Current and historical drivers of landscape genetic structure differ in core and peripheral salamander populations. PLoS ONE 7: e36769.
19. Edelaar P, and, Bolnick DI,. 2012. Non-random gene flow: an underappreciated force in evolution and ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 27: 659-65.
20. Engler R, Hordijk W, and, Guisan A,. 2012. The MIGCLIM R package-seamless integration of dispersal constraints into projections of species distribution models. Ecography 35: 872-78.
21. Galil BS,. 2007. Loss or gain? Invasive aliens and biodiversity in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar Pollut Bull 55: 314-22.
22. Gilbert-Norton L, Wilson R, Stevens JR, et al,. 2010. A meta-analytic review of corridor effectiveness. Conserv Biol 24: 660-68.
23. Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, et al,. 2015. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth's ecosystems. Science Advances 1: e1500052.
24. Hale ML, Lurz PWW, Shirley MDF, et al,. 2001. Impact of landscape management on the genetic structure of red squirrel populations. Science 293: 2246-48.
25. Heller NE, and, Zavaleta ES,. 2009. Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: a review of 22 years of recommendations. Biol Conserv 142: 14-32.
26. Hermoso V, Januchowski-Hartley SR, and, Linke S,. 2015. Systematic planning of disconnection to enhance conservation success in a modified world. Sci Total Environ 536: 1038-44.
27. Holt BG, Lessard JP, Borregaard MK, et al,. 2013. An update of Wallace's zoogeographic regions of the world. Science 339: 74-78.
28. Hulme PE, Bacher S, Kenis M, et al,. 2008. Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy. J Appl Ecol 45: 403-14.
29. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2014. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: regional aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [, Barros VR, Field CB, Dokken DJ, et al. (Eds)]. Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
30. Landguth EL, Cushman SA, Schwartz MK, et al,. 2010. Quantifying the lag time to detect barriers in landscape genetics. Mol Ecol 19: 4179-91.
31. Marcot BG, Singleton PH, and, Schumaker NH,. 2015. Analysis of sensitivity and uncertainty in an individual-based model of a threatened wildlife species. Nat Resour Model 28: 37-58.
32. McRae BH, Hall S, Beier P, et al,. 2012. Where to restore ecological connectivity? Detecting barriers and quantifying restoration benefits. PLoS ONE 7: e52604.
33. Mendenhall CD, Karp DS, Meyer CFJ, et al,. 2014. Predicting biodiversity change and averting collapse in agricultural landscapes. Nature 509: 213-17.
34. Naka LN, Bechtoldt CL, Magalli Pinto Henriques L, et al,. 2012. The role of physical barriers in the location of avian suture zones in the Guiana Shield, Northern Amazonia. Am Nat 179: E115-E132.
35. Ozinga WA, Roemermann C, Bekker RM, et al,. 2009. Dispersal failure contributes to plant losses in NW Europe. Ecol Lett 12: 66-74.
36. Peterson AT, and, Nyári ÁS,. 2008. Ecological niche conservatism and Pleistocene refugia in the thrush-like mourner, Schiffornis sp, in the neotropics. Evolution 62: 173-83.
37. Phillips BL, Brown GP, Webb JK, et al,. 2006. Invasion and the evolution of speed in toads. Nature 439: 803.
38. Pollux BJA, Luteijn A, Van Groenendael JM, et al,. 2009. Gene flow and genetic structure of the aquatic macrophyte Sparganium emersum in a linear unidirectional river. Freshwat Biol 54: 64-76.
39. Pringle JM, Blakeslee AMH, Byers JE, et al,. 2011. Asymmetric dispersal allows an upstream region to control population structure throughout a species' range. P Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 15288-93.
40. Rellstab C, Gugerli F, Eckert AJ, et al,. 2015. A practical guide to environmental association analysis in landscape genomics. Mol Ecol 24: 4348-70.
41. Rice KJ, and, Emery NC,. 2003. Managing microevolution: restoration in the face of global change. Front Ecol Environ 1: 469-78.
42. Ronce O,. 2007. How does it feel to be like a rolling stone? Ten questions about dispersal evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38: 231-53.
43. Sorte CJB,. 2013. Predicting persistence in a changing climate: flow direction and limitations to redistribution. Oikos 122: 161-70.
44. Thomas CD, Bodsworth EJ, Wilson RJ, et al,. 2001. Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins. Nature 411: 577-81.
45. Travis JMJ, Delgado M, Bocedi G, et al,. 2013. Dispersal and species' responses to climate change. Oikos 122: 1532-40.
46. Treml E, Roberts J, Halpin P, et al,. 2015. The emergent geography of biophysical dispersal barriers across the Indo-West Pacific. Divers Distrib 21: 465-76.
47. Urban MC, and, De Meester L,. 2009. Community monopolization: local adaptation enhances priority effects in an evolving metacommunity. Proc R Soc B 276: 4129-38.
48. van der Grift EA, and, van der Ree R,. 2015. Guidelines for evaluating use of wildlife crossing structures. In:, van der Ree R, Smith DJ, and, Grilo C, (Eds). Handbook of road ecology. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
49. Viana DS, Santamaría L, Michot TC, et al,. 2013. Migratory strategies of waterbirds shape the continental-scale dispersal of aquatic organisms. Ecography 36: 430-38.
50. Visser ME, Perdeck AC, van Balen JH, et al,. 2009. Climate change leads to decreasing bird migration distances. Global Change Biol 15: 1859-65.
51. Webber BL, Scott JK, and, Didham RK,. 2011. Translocation or bust! A new acclimatization agenda for the 21st century? Trends Ecol Evol 26: 495-96.
52. Whiteley A, McGarigal K, and, Schwartz M,. 2014. Pronounced differences in genetic structure despite overall ecological similarity for two Ambystoma salamanders in the same landscape. Conserv Genet 15: 573-91.
53. Zeigler SL, and, Fagan WF,. 2014. Transient windows for connectivity in a changing world. Movement Ecol 2; doi: 10.1186/2051-3933-2-1.
54. Zeller K, McGarigal K, and, Whiteley A,. 2012. Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landscape Ecol 27: 777-97.