Transient windows for connectivity in a changing world

Movement Ecology

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Zeigler, Sara L ^a   Fagan, William F ^b  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Bldg 142   (United States)

Author keywords

Anthropogenic change; Dispersal; Disturbance; Dynamic landscapes; Functional connectivity; Movement; Static landscapes; Structural connectivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926355450     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20513933     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2051-3933-2-1     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Fahrig L: Relative importance of spatial and temporal scales in a patchy environment. Theor Popul Biol 1992, 41:300-314
2. Stelter C, Reich M, Grimm V, Wissel C: Modelling persistence in dynamic landscapes: lessons from a metapopulation of the grasshopper Bryodema tuberculata. J Anim Ecol 1997, 66:508-518
3. Catlin D, Felio J, Fraser J: Effects of water discharge on fledging time, growth, and survival of piping plovers on the Missouri River. J Wildl Manag 2013, 77:525-533
4. Keymer J, Marquet P, Velasco-Hernandez J, Levine S: Extinction thresholds and metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes. Am Nat 2000, 156:478-494
5. Cornell S, Ovaskainen O: Exact asymptotic analysis for metapopulation dynamics in correlated dynamic landscapes. Theor Popul Biol 2008, 74:209-225
6. Hanski I: Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes. Oikos 1999, 87:209-219
7. Johnson M: The influence of patch demographics on metapopulations with particular reference to successional landscapes. Oikos 2000, 88:67-74
8. Amarasekare P, Possingham H: Patch dynamics and metapopulation theory: a case of successional species. J Theor Biol 2001, 209:333-344
9. Johst K, Brandl R, Eber S: Metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes: the role of dispersal distance. Oikos 2002, 98:263-270
10. Hodgson J, Moilanen A, Thomas C: Metapopulation responses to patch connectivity and quality are masked by successional habitat dynamics. Ecology 2009, 90:1608-1619
11. Ellner S, Fussmann G: Effects of successional dynamics on metapopulation persistence. Ecology 2003, 84:882-889
12. Kallimanis A, Kunin W, Halley J, Sgardelis S: Metapopulation extinction risk under spatially autocorrelated disturbance. Conserv Biol 2005, 19:534-546
13. Vuilleumier S, Wilcox C, Cairns B, Possingham H: How patch configuration affects the impact of disturbances on metapopulation persistence. Theor Popul Biol 2007, 72:77-85
14. Johst K, Drechsler M, van Teeffelen A, Hartig F, Vos C, Wissel S, Watzold F, Opdam P: Biodiversity conservation in dynamic landscapes: trade-offs between number, connectivity, and turnover of habitat patches. J Appl Ecol 2011, 48:1227-1235
15. Wimberly M: Species dynamics in disturbed landscapes: when does shifting habitat mosaic enhance connectivity? Landsc Ecol 2006, 21:35-46
16. Driscoll D, Banks S, Barton P, Lindenmayer D, Smith A: Conceptual domain of the matrix in fragmented landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol 2013, 28:605-613
17. Wahlberg N, Klemetti T, Hanski I: Dynamic populations in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly. Ecography 2002, 25:224-232
18. Carson H, Lopez-Duarte P, Rasmussen L, Wang D, Levin L: Reproductive timing alters population connectivity in marine metapopulations. Curr Biol 2010, 20:1926-1931
19. Sieving KE, Contreras TA, Maute KL: Heterospecific facilitation of forestboundary crossing by mobbing understory birds in north-central Florida. Auk 2004, 121:738-751
20. Anzures-Dadda A, Manson R: Patch-and landscape-scale effects on howler monkey distribution and abundance in rainforest fragments. Anim Conserv 2007, 10:69-76
21. Fagan W, Unmack P, Burgess C, Minckley W: Rarity, fragmentation, and extinction risk in desert fishes. Ecology 2002, 83:3250-3256
22. Harding K, McNamara J: A unifying framework for metapopulation dynamics. Am Nat 2002, 160:173-185
23. Levins R: Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 1969, 15:237-240
24. Hanski I: Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Biol J Linn Soc 1991, 42:3-16
25. With K, Gardner R, Turner M: Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments. Oikos 1997, 78:151-169
26. Fagan W: Connectivity, fragmentation, and extinction risk in dendritic metapopulations. Ecology 2002, 83:3243-3249
27. Lowe W: Landscape-scale spatial population dynamics in humanimpacted stream systems. Environ Manage 2002, 30:225-233
28. Schmiegelow F, Monkkonen M: Habitat loss and fragmentation in dynamic landscapes: avian perspectives from the boreal forest. Ecol Appl 2002, 12:375-389
29. Kesler D, Walters J: Social composition of destination territories and matrix habitat affect red-cockaded woodpecker dispersal. J Wildl Manag 2011, 9999:1-8
30. Frost C: Presettlement fire frequency regimes in the United States: a first approximation. In The longleaf pine ecosystem: ecology, restoration, and management. Edited by Hermann S. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station; 1998. Volume Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference Proceedings, No. 18
31. Tiebout H, Anderson R: A comparison of corridors and intrinsic connectivity to promote dispersal in a transient successional landscape. Conserv Biol 1997, 11:620-627
32. Williams P, Hastings A: Stochastic dispersal and population persistence in marine organisms. Am Nat 2013, 182:271-282
33. Cormont A, Malinowska A, Kostenko O, Radchuk V, Hemerik L, Wallis De Vries M, Verboom J: Effect of local weather on butterfly flight behaviour, movement, and colonization: significance for dispersal under climate change. Biodivers Conserv 2010, 20:483-503
34. Lodge T: The everglades handbook: understanding the ecosystem (2nd edition). Boca Raton FL: CRC Press; 2004
35. DeAngelis DL, Trexler J, Cosner C, Obaza A, Jopp F: Fish population dynamics in a seasonally varying wetland. Ecol Model 2010, 221:1131-1137
36. Trexler J, Loftus W, Perry S: Disturbance frequency and community structure in a twenty-five year intervention study. Oecolgia 2005, 145:140-152
37. Kerezsy A, Balcombe S, Tischler M, Arthington A: Fish movement strategies in an ephemeral river in the Simpson Desert. Austral-Ecology: Australia; 2013. doi:10.1111/aec.12075
38. Amoros C, Bornette G: Connectivity and biocomplexity in waterbodies of riverine floodplains. Freshw Biol 2002, 47:761-776
39. Bowen Z, Bovee K, Waddle T: Effects of flow regulation on shallow water habitat dynamics and floodplain connectivity. Trans Am Fish Soc 2003, 132:809-823
40. Unmack P: Fish persistence and fluvial geomorphology in central Australia. J Arid Environ 2001, 49:653-669
41. Marino P: Dispersal and coexistence of mosses (Splachnaceae) in patchy habitats. J Ecol 1991, 79:1047-1060
42. Danchin E, Boulinier T, Massot M: Conspecific reproductive success and breeding habitat selection: implications for the study of coloniality. Ecology 1998, 79:2415-2428
43. Stamps JA: Conspecific attraction and aggregation in territorial species. Am Nat 1988, 131:329-347
44. Mönkkönen M, Forsman JT: Heterospecific attraction among forest birds: a review. Ornithol Sci 2002, 1:41-51
45. Parejo D, Danchin E, Aviles JM: The heterospecific habitat copying hypothesis: can competitors indicate habitat quality? Behav Ecol 2004, 16:96-105
46. Zeigler S, Neel M, Oliveira L, Raboy B, Fagan W: Conspecific and heterospecific attraction in assessments of functional connectivity. Biodivers Conserv 2011, 20:2779-2796
47. Kozakiewicz M: Resource tracking in space and time. In Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes. Edited by Hansson L, Fahrig L, Merriam G. London: Chapman and Hall; 1995:136-148
48. Dunning JB, Danielson BJ, Pulliam HR: Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 1992, 65:169-175
49. Henderson M, Merriam G, Wegner J: Patchy environments and species survival: chipmunks in an agricultural mosaic. Biol Conserv 1985, 31:95-105
50. Brown J, Kodric-Brown A: Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 1977, 58:445-449
51. Richards C: Inbreeding depression and genetic rescue in a plant metapopulation. Am Nat 2000, 155:383-394
52. Grenfell B, Harwood J: (Meta)population dynamics of infectious diseases. Trends Ecol Evol 1997, 12:395-399
53. Joshi J, Schmid B, Caldeira M, Dimitrakopoulos P, Good J, Harris R, Hector A, Huss-Danell K, Jumpponen A, Minns A, et al: Local adaptation enhances performance of common plant species. Ecol Lett 2001, 4:536-544
54. Lowe W, Allendorf F: What can genetics tell us about population connectivity? Mol Ecol 2010, 19:3038-3051
55. Benzie J: Genetic structure of coral reef organisms: ghosts of dispersal past. Am Zool 1999, 39:131-145
56. Palumbi S, Grabowsky G, Duda T, Geyer L, Tachino N: Speciation and population genetic structure in tropical Pacific sea urchins. Evolution 1997, 51:1506-1517
57. Hoberg E, Brooks D: Beyond vicariance: integrating taxon pulses, ecological fitting, and oscillation in evolution and historical biogeography. In The Biogeography of Host-Parasite Interactions. Edited by Morand S, Krasnov B. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2010:7-20
58. Brown S, Harrisson K, Clarke R, Bennett A, Sunnucks P: Limited population structure, genetic drift, and bottlenecks characterise an endangered bird species in a dynamic, fire-prone ecosystem. PLOS ONE 2013, 8:e59732
59. Pachauri R: Climate change 2007. Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report. Geneva, Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; 2008
60. Solomon S, Plattner G-K, Knutti R, Friedlingstein P: Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences 2009, 106:1704-1709
61. Turner M: Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world. Ecology 2010, 91:2833-2849
62. Sahanatien V, Derocher A: Monitoring sea ice habitat fragmentation for polar bear conservation. Anim Conserv 2012, 15:397-406
63. Derocher A, Lunn N, Stirling I: Polar bears in a warming climate. Integr Comp Biol 2004, 44:163-176
64. Zozaya E, Brotons L, Saura S: Recent fire history and connectivity patterns determine bird species distribution dynamics in landscapes dominated by land abandonment. Landsc Ecol 2012, 27:171-184
65. Blaum N, Schwager M, Wichmann M, Rossmanith E: Climate induced changes in matrix suitability explain gene flow in a fragmented landscape-the effect of interannual rainfall variability. Ecography 2012, 35:650-660
66. Hohensinner S, Jungwirth M, Schmutz S: Spatio-temporal habitat dynamics in a changing Danube River landscape 1812-2006. River Res Appl 2011, 27:939-955
67. Leibowitz S, Brooks R: Hydrology and landscape connectivity of vernal pools. In Science and conservation of vernal pools in northeastern North America. Edited by Calhoun A, DeMaynadier P. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2008
68. Banks S, Cary G, Smith A, Davies I, Driscoll D, Gill M, Lindenmayer D, Peakall R: How does ecological disturbance influence genetic diversity? Trends Ecol Evol 2013, 28:670-679
69. Gurarie E, Suutarinen J, Kojola I, Ovaskainen O: Summer movements, predation, and habitat use of wolves in human-modified boreal forests. Oecologia 2011, 165:891-903
70. Lesmerises F, Dussault C, St-Laurent M-H: Wolf habitat selection is shaped by human activities in a highly managed boreal forest. For Ecol Manage 2012, 276:125-131
71. Tikka P, Hogmander H, Koski P: Roadway and railway verges serve as dispersal corridors for grassland plants. Landsc Ecol 2001, 16:659-666
72. Munguira M, Thomas J: Use of road verges by butterfly and burnet populations and the effect of roads on adult dispersal and mortality. J Appl Ecol 1992, 29:316-329
73. Corlett R, Westcott D: Will plant movements keep up with climate change? Trends Ecol Evol 2013, 28:482-488
74. Walther G-R, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee T, Fromentin J-M, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bairlein F: Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 2002, 416:389-395
75. Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Leadley P, Thuiller W, Courchamp F: Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol Lett 2012, 15:365-377
76. Vitousek P, Mooney H, Luchenco J, Melillo J: Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Science 1997, 277:494-499
77. van Teefelen A, Vos C, Opdam P: Species in a dynamic world: consequences of habitat network dynamics on conservation planning. Biol Conserv 2012, 153:239-253
78. Kool J, Moilanen A, Treml E: Population connectivity: recent advances and new perspectives. Landsc Ecol 2013, 28:165-185