Science, Public Engagement with

International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 255-260

  Irwin, Alan ^a  

^a Copenhagen Business School ^*  (Denmark)

Author keywords

Citizen science; Civic epistemology; Deficit model; Public consultation; Science and democracy; Science communication; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 84971626637     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.85055-2     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Bauer M.W., Howard S. Editorial: public understanding of science - a peer reviewed journal for turbulent times. Public Understanding of Science 2012, 21(3):258-267.
2. Beck U. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity 1992, Sage, London.
3. Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology 2008, Routledge, Abingdon, New York. M. Bucchi, B. Trench (Eds.).
4. Callon M., Lascoumes P., Barthe Y. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy 2011, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. European Commission Science and Society Action Plan 2002, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
6. Felt U., Fochler M. Machineries for making publics: inscribing and de-scribing publics in public engagement. Minerva 2010, 48:219-238.
7. Felt U., Wynne B. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission 2007, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
8. Guston D.H. Evaluating the first US consensus conference: the impact of the 'citizen's panel on telecommunications and the future of democracy'. Science, Technology, & Human Values 1999, 24(4):451-482.
9. Hagendijk R., Irwin A. Public deliberation and governance: engaging with science and technology in contemporary Europe. Minerva 2006, 44:167-184.
10. Horlick-Jones T., Walls J., Rowe G., Pidgeon N., Poortinga W., Murdock G., O'Riordan T. The GM Debate: Risk, Politics and Public Engagement 2007, Routledge, London.
11. Horst M. Taking our own medicine: on an experiment in science communication. Science and Engineering Ethics 2011, 17(4):801-815.
12. Horst M., Irwin A. Nations at ease with radical knowledge: on consensus, consensusing and false consensusness. Social Studies of Science 2010, 40(1):105-126.
13. Horst M., Michael M. On the shoulders of idiots: re-thinking science communication as 'event'. Science as Culture 2011, 20(3):283-306.
14. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology Third Report: Science and Society February 2000, The Stationery Office, London.
15. Irwin A. Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development 1995, Routledge, London.
16. Irwin A. Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Understanding of Science 2001, 10(1):1-18.
17. Irwin A. The politics of talk: coming to terms with the 'new' scientific governance. Social Studies of Science 2006, 36(2):299-320.
18. Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology 1996, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. A. Irwin, B. Wynne (Eds.).
19. Jasanoff S. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States 2005, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, and Woodstock, Oxfordshire.
20. Marres N. Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics 2012, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
21. Marres N., Lezaun J. Materials and devices of the public: an introduction. Economy and Society 2011, 40(4):489-509.
22. Michael M. Between citizen and consumer: multiplying the meanings of 'public understanding of science'. Public Understanding of Science 1998, 7:313-327.
23. Nelkin D. The political impact of technical expertise. Social Studies of Science 1975, 5(1):35-54.
24. Nelkin D. Technological Decisions and Democracy: European Experiments in Public Participation 1977, Sage, Beverly Hills and London.
25. Phillips L., Bridgeman J., Ferguson-Smith M. The BSE Inquiry: The Phillips Report October 2000, vol. 1. The Stationery Office, London.
26. Royal Society The Public Understanding of Science 1985, Royal Society, London.
27. Stirling A. 'Opening up' and 'closing down': power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values 2008, 33:262-294.
28. Trench B. Towards an analytical framework of science communication models. Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practices 2008, 119-135. Springer, Dordrecht. D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele, S. Shi (Eds.).
29. Wilsdon J., Willis R. See-through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream 2004, Demos, London.
30. Wynne B. Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identities and public uptake of science. Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology 1996, 19-46. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. A. Irwin, B. Wynne (Eds.).
31. Wynne B. Public engagement as a means of restoring trust: hitting the notes but missing the music?. Community Genetics 2006, 9:211-220.
32. Yearley S. Environmental action groups and other NGOs as communicators of science. Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology 2008, 159-171. Routledge, Abingdon and New York. M. Bucchi, B. Trench (Eds.).