Vaginal delivery of breech presentation;Accouchement du siège par voie vaginale

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 567-578

  Kotaska, Andrew ^a   Menticoglou, Savas ^b   Gagnon, Robert ^b   Farine, Dan ^b   Basso, Melanie ^c   Bos, Hayley ^b   Delisle, Marie France ^c   Grabowska, Kirsten ^c   Hudon, Lynda ^b   Mundle, William ^b   Murphy Kaulbeck, Lynn ^d   Ouellet, Annie ^b   Pressey, Tracy ^c   Roggensack, Anne ^b  

^a NONE   (Canada)

^b NONE   (Canada)

^c Vancouver (C B)   (Canada)

^d NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; VAGINAL DELIVERY; CLASSIFICATION; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; FETUS GROWTH; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LABOR MANAGEMENT; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; MATERNAL MORTALITY; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SELECTION; PERINATAL MORTALITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; RISK REDUCTION; TREATMENT PLANNING; VAGINAL BREECH BIRTH; CANADA; DELIVERY; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; INFORMED CONSENT; PREGNANCY;

BREECH PRESENTATION; CANADA; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PREGNANCY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 84971516988     PISSN: 17012163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34222-0     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Plentl A., Stone R. The Bracht Maneuver. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1953, 8(3):313-325.
2. Kubli F., Rüttgers H., Meyer-Menk M. Die fetale Acidosegefährdung bei vaginaler Geburt aus Beckenendlage [article en allemand]. Z Geburtsh Perinat 1975, 179:1-16.
3. Bracht E. Zur Behandlung der Steisslage [article en allemand]. Zentralbl Gynakol 1938, 62:1735.
4. Bellew L.N., Allison H.M., Greenville S.C. Experience with the Bracht Method of delivery of the breech. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1958, 76(4):754-760.
5. Thiessen P. Spontangeburt, Herausleiten und Manualhilfe bei der Geburt in Beckenendlage [article en allemand]. Zentralbl Gynakol 1952, 74(50):1969-1976.
6. Thiessen P. Die eigene Geburtsleitung bei Beckenendlage und ihr Gegensatz zur Schul- oder Lehrauffassung [article en allemand]. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 1964, 24:661-682.
7. Løvset J. Shoulder delivery by breech presentation. J Obset Gynaecol Brit Emp 1937, 44:696-704.
8. Albrechtsen S., Ramussen S., Irgens L.M. Secular trends in peri- and neonatal mortality in breech presentation; Norway 1967-1994. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000, 79:508-512.
9. Hannah M.E., Hannah W.J., Hewson S.A., Hodnett E.D., Saigal S., Willan A.R. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicentre trial. Lancet 2000, 356:1375-1383.
10. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists RCOG Green Top Guidelines: The Management of Breech Presentation, Guideline no. 20 2001, RCOG, Londres.
11. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG Committee Opinion No. 265, Mode of Term Singleton Breech Delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2001, 98:1189-1190.
12. Phipps H., Roberts C.L., Nassar N., Raynes-Greenow C.H., Peat B., Hutton E.K. The management of breech pregnancies in Australia and New Zealand. Aus NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 2003, 43:294-297.
13. Hogle K.L., Kilburn L., Hewson S., Gafni A., Wall R., Hannah M.E. Impact of the international term breech trial on clinical practice and concerns: a survey of centre collaborators. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003, 25:14-16.
14. Goffinet F., Blondel B., Bréart G. À propos du débat sur le siège. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2001, 30:187-190.
15. Hauth J.C., Cunningham F.G. Vaginal breech delivery is still justified. Obstet Gynecol 2002, 99:1115-1116.
16. Van Roosmalen J., Rosendaal F. There is still room for disagreement about vaginal delivery of breech infants at term. BJOG 2002, 109:967-969.
17. Kotaska A. Inappropriate use of randomized trials to evaluate complex phenomena: case study of vaginal breech delivery. BMJ 2004, 329:1039-1042.
18. Keirse M.J. Evidence-based childbirth only for breech babies?. Birth 2002, 29(1):55-59.
19. Menticoglou S.M. Why vaginal breech delivery should still be offered. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2006, 28:380-385.
20. Glezerman M. Five years to the term breech trial: the rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006, 194:20-25.
21. University of Toronto Maternal, Infant and Reproductive Health Research Unit. Term breech trial study protocol 1996, 8.
22. Su M., McLeod L., Ross S., Willan A., Hannah W.J., Hutton E. Factors associated with adverse perinatal outcome in the Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003, 189:740-745. et coll.
23. Whyte H., Hannah M.E., Saigal S., Hannah W., Hewson S., Amankwah K. Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: The International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004, 191:864-871. et coll.
24. Danelian P.J., Wang J., Hall M.H. Long term outcome by method of delivery of fetuses in breech presentation at term: population based follow-up. BMJ 1996, 312:1451-1453.
25. Pradhan P., Mohajer M., Deshpande S. Outcome of term breech births: 10-year experience at a district general hospital. BJOG 2005, 112:218-222.
26. Giuliani A., Scholl W.M.J., Basver A., Tamussino K.F. Mode of delivery and outcome of 699 term singleton breech deliveries at a single center. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002, 187:1694-1698.
27. Hellsten C., Lindqvist P.G., Olofsson P. Vaginal breech delivery: is it still an option?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003, 111:122-128.
28. Munstedt K., von Georgi R., Reucher S., Zygmunt M., Lang U. Term breech and long-term morbidity-cesarean section versus vaginal breech delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Repro Biol 2001, 96:864-871.
29. Thilaganathan B., Meher-Homji N., Nicolaides K.H. Labor: an immunologically beneficial process for the neonate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994, 171(5):1271-1272.
30. Malamitsi-Puchner A., Protonotariou E., Boutsikou T., Makrakis E., Sarandakou A., Creatsas G. The influence of the mode of delivery on circulating cytokine concentrations in the perinatal period. Early Hum Dev 2005, 81:387-392.
31. Negele K., Heinrich J., Borte M., von Berg A., Schaaf B., Lehmann I. Mode of delivery and development of atopic disease during the first 2 years of life. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2004, 15:48-54. et coll.
32. Laubereau B., Filipiak-Pittroff B., von Berg A., Grübl A., Reinhardt D., Wichmann H.E. Caesarean section and gastrointestinal symptoms, atopic dermatitis, and sensitisation during the first year of life. Arch Dis Child 2004, 89:993-997. et coll.
33. Kayem G., Goffinet F., Clement D., Hessabi M., Cabrol D. Breech presentation at term: morbidity and mortality according to the type of delivery at Port Royal Maternity hospital from 1993 through 1999. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002, 102:137-142.
34. Alarab M., Regan C., O'Connell M.P., Keane D.P., O'Herlihy C., Foley M.E. Singleton vaginal delivery at term: still a safe option. Obstet Gynecol 2004, 103:407-412.
35. Irion O., Almagbaly P.H., Morabia A. Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section: a study of 705 singleton term breech presentations. Brit J Obstet Gynaecol 1998, 105:710-717.
36. Albrechtsen S., Rasmussen S., Reigstad H., Markestad T., Irgens L.M., Dalaker K. Evaluation of a protocol for selecting fetuses in breech presentation for vaginal delivery or cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997, 177:586-592.
37. Krause M., Lenz A., Feige A. Vaginale Beckenendlagengeburt- Entscheidungskriterien und Einfluss auf die kindliche Morbiditaet [article en allemand]. Hebamme 1999, 12:22-29.
38. Goffinet F., Carayol M., Foidart J.M., Alexander S., Uzan S., Subtil D. PREMODA Study Group. « Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006, 194:1002-1011. et coll.
39. Rietberg C.C., Elferink-Stinkens P.M., Visser G.H. The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants. BJOG 2005, 112:205-209.
40. Schutte J.M., Steegers A.P., Satema J.G., Schuitemaker N.W., Van Roosmalen J. Maternal deaths after elective cesarean section for breech presentation in the Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol 2007, 86:240-243.
41. Verhoeven A.T.M., de Leeuw J.P., Bruinse H.W. Breech presentation at term: elective cesarean section is the wrong choice as a standard treatment because of too high risks for the mother and her future children [article en néérlandais]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2005, 149:2207-2211.
42. Burke G. The end of vaginal breech delivery. BJOG 2006, 113:969-972.
43. Porter R. Breech delivery: the dilemma. BJOG 2006, 113:973-974.
44. de Leeuw J.P., Verhoeven A.T.M., Schutte J.M., Zwart J., van Roosmalen J. The end of vaginal breech delivery (letter). BJOG 2007, 114:373-374.
45. Svenningsen N.W., Westgren M., Ingemarsson I. Modern strategy for the term breech delivery-A study with 4-year follow-up of the infants. J Perinat Med 1985, 13:117-126.
46. Westgren M., Grundsell H., Ingemarsson I., Mühlow A., Svenningsen N.W. Hyperextension of the fetal head in breech presentation. A study with long-term follow-up. Brit J Obstet Gynaecol 1981, 88:101-104.
47. Kinugasa M., Sato T., Tamura M., Suzuki H., Miyazaki Y., Imanaka M. Antepartum detection of cord presentation by transvaginal ultrasonography for term breech presentation: potential prediction and prevention of cord prolapse. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2007, 33(5):612-618.
48. Cunningham F.G., Leveno K.J., Bloom S.L., Hauth J.C., Gilstrap L., Wenstrom K.D. Williams Obstetrics 2005, McGraw-Hill. 22e éd.
49. Murphy D.J., MacKenzie I.Z. The mortality and morbidity associated with umbilical cord prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995, 102:826-830.
50. Brady K., Duff P., Read J.A., Harlass F.E. Reliability of fetal buttock sampling in assessing the acid-base balance of the breech fetus. Obstet Gynecol 1989, 74:886-888.
51. Rojansky N., Tsafrir A., Ophir E., Ezra Y. Induction of labour in breech presentation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001, 74(2):151-156.
52. Chadha Y.C., Mahmood T.A., Dick M.J., Smith N.C., Campbell D.M., Templeton A. Breech delivery and epidural analgesia. Brit J Obstet Gynaecol 1992, 99:96-100.
53. Jotkowitz M.W., Picton F.C.R. An appraisal of an anatomically and physiologically correct method of breech delivery: the Bracht Maneuver. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1970, 10:151-159.
54. Krause M., Feige A. Techniques for Vaginal Breech Delivery [article en allemand]. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2008, 68:R25-R48.
55. Menticoglou S.M. Symphysiotomy for the trapped aftercoming parts of the breech: a review of the literature and plea for its use. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1990, 30:1-9.
56. Pust R.E., Hirschler R.A., Lennox C.E. Emergency symphysiotomy for the trapped head in breech delivery: indications, limitations, and method. Trop Doct 1992, 22:71-75.
57. Sandberg E.C. The Zavanelli maneuver: 12 years of recorded experience. Obstet Gynecol 1999, 93(2):312-317.
58. Office of the Chief Coroner of British Columbia. Judgement of Enquiry into Death 2005.
59. Kotaska A. « Combatting coercion: breech birth, parturient choice, and the evolution of evidence-based maternity care », Birth, vol. 32, no 2, p. 76-80.
60. Royal College of Obstetricians and RCOG Green Top Guidelines: The management of breech presentation. Guideline no. 20b décembre 2006, RCOG, Londres.
61. American College of Obstetricians ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340, Mode of term singleton breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006, 108:235-237.
62. Woolf S.H., Battista R.N., Angerson G.M., Logan A.G., Eel W. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. « New grades for recommendations from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care ». CMAJ 2003, 169(3):207-208.