Vaginal breech delivery is still justified

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 99, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1115-1116

  Hauth, John C ^a   Cunningham, F Gary ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OXYTOCIN;

APGAR SCORE; BIRTH INJURY; BREECH EXTRACTION; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABOR INDUCTION; MATERNAL MORTALITY; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; PARITY; PERINATAL MORBIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SHORT SURVEY; VAGINAL DELIVERY; X RAY PELVIMETRY;

EID: 0036270988     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02031-8     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: A randomised multicentre trial
2. The MFMU cesarean registry: Infectious morbidity following primary cesarean section
3. Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section: A study of 705 singleton term breech presentations