Breech presentation at term: Elective caesarian section is the wrong choice as a standard treatment because of too high risks for the mother and her future children;Aterme stuitligging: Onterechte keus voor de electieve keizersnede als standaardbehandeling vanwege te hoge risico's voor de moeder en haar volgende kinderen

Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

Volumn 149, Issue 40, 2005, Pages 2207-2210

  Verhoeven, A T M ^a,c   De Leeuw, J P ^b   Bruinse, H W ^c  

^a RIJNLAND HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APGAR SCORE; BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EMERGENCY SURGERY; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HUMAN; MATERNAL MORTALITY; NETHERLANDS; PERINATAL DEATH; PLACENTA PREVIA; REVIEW; UTERUS RUPTURE; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADULT; BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; MATERNAL MORTALITY; PARTURITION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RISK FACTORS; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 26244456622     PISSN: 00282162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000;356:1375-83.
2. Verhoeven AThM. De aterme stuitligging: keus voor keizersnede [ingezonden]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001;145:2100-1.
3. Leeuw JP de. De aterme stuitligging: keus voor keizersnede [ingezonden]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001;145:2100-1.
4. Lotgering FK, Senden IPM, Steegers EAP, Wijman MJNC. De aterme stuitligging: keus voor keizersnede [ingezonden]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001;145:2101-2.
5. Roosmalen J van, Scherjon SA. De aterme stuitligging: keus voor keizersnede [ingezonden]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001;145:2102-3.
6. Roumen FJME, Nijhuis JG. De aterme stuitligging: keus voor keizersnede. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001;145:1533-6.
7. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hodnett ED, Chalmers B, Kung R, Willan A, et al. Outcomes at 3 months after planned cesarean vs planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. JAMA. 2002;287:1822-31.
8. Su M, McLeod L, Ross S, Willan A, Hannah WJ, Hutton E, et al. Factors associated with adverse perinatal outcome in the Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:740-5.
9. Hannah ME, Whyte H, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K, Cheng M, et al. Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:917-27.
10. Su M, Hannah WJ, Willan A, Ross S, Hannah ME. Planned caesarean section decreases the risk of adverse perinatal outcome due to both labour and delivery complications in the Term Breech Trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. BJOG. 2004;111:1065-74.
11. Whyte H, Hannah ME, Saigal S, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K, et al. Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:864-71.
12. Verbruggen MB, Leeuw JP de, Verhoeven AThM. Wat nu met de à terme stuitligging in België en Nederland? Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde. 2001;57:1401-4.
13. Rietberg CC, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Brand R, Loon AJ van, Hemel OJ van, Visser GH. Term breech presentation in the Netherlands from 1995 to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of 33824 infants. BJOG. 2003;110:604-9.
14. Rietberg CCTh, Lotgerink FK. Kiezen voor moeder of kind. Med Contact. 2003;58:1058-61.
15. Rietberg CC, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Visser GH. The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in the Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants. BJOG. 2005;112:205-9.
16. Molkenboer JFM, Bouckaert PXJM, Roumen FJME. Recent trends in breech delivery in the Netherlands. BJOG. 2003;110:948-51.
17. Lotgerink FK. Verloskunde anno 2003. Authority based, evidence based [inaugurele rede]. Nijmegen: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen; 2003.
18. Krebs L. Langhoff-Ross Breech presentation: neonatal morbidity and mortality after vaginal and abdominal delivery at term. In: Künzel W, editor. Breech delivery. Parijs: Scientifiques et Medicales Elsevier SAS; 2002.
19. Nelson KB, Ellenberg JH. Apgar scores as predictors of chronic neurologic disability. Pediatrics. 1981;68:36-44.
20. Kubli F, Broos W, Rüutgers H. Caesarean section in the management of singleton breech presentation. In: Rooth G, Bratteby I-E, editors. Perinatal medicine. Fifth European Congress of Perinatal Medicine, Uppsala. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksel; 1976.
21. Hellsten C, Lindqvist PG, Olofsson P. Vaginal breech delivery: is it still an option? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;111:122-8.
22. Schutte JM, Boer K de, Briët JW, Pel M, Santema JG, Schuitemaker NWE, et al. Moedersterfte in Nederland: het topje van de ijsberg. Ned Tijdschr Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;118:89-91.
23. Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GHA, Bruinse HW. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a prospective study in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol [ter perse].
24. Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GHA, Bruinse HW. Uterine rupture and its complications: a prospective study in the Netherlands. In: Kwee A. Caesarian section in the Netherlands. Policy, prevention and long term consequences [proefschrift]. Utrecht [ter perse].
25. Voet LF van der, Kwee A, Damen K, Bruinse HW. Stuit per sectio eruit en dan ... Abstractenboek Gynaecongres Papendal; 2004. p. 87-9.
26. Wen SW, Rusen ID, Walker M, Liston R, Kramer MS, Baskett T, et al. Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labor and elective cesarean section among women with previous cesarean delivery. Maternal Health Study Group, Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1263-9.
27. Smith GCS, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. Lancet. 2003;362: 1779-84.
28. Bais JMJ, Borden DMR van der, Pel M, Bonsel GJ, Eskes M, Slikke HJW van der, et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean section in a population with a low overall caesarean section rate. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;96:158-62.
29. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leven KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2581-9.
30. Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:1071-8.
31. Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Hallak M, Hershkowitz R, Katz M, Mazor M. Placenta previa: obstetric risk factors and pregnancy outcome. J Matern Fetal Med. 2001;10:414-9.
32. Kotaska A. Inappropriate use of randomised trials to evaluate complex phenomena: case study of vaginal breech delivery. BMJ. 2004; 329:1039-42.
33. Alarab M, Regan C, O'Connell MP, Keane DP, O'Herlihy C, Foley ME. Singleton vaginal breech delivery at term: still a safe option. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:407-12.
34. Krebs L, Langhoff-Roos J, Bodker B. Are intrapartum and neonatal deaths in breech delivery at term potentially avoidable? A blinded controlled audit. J Perinat Med. 2002;30:220-4.
35. Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term [Cochrane review]. The Cochrane Library. Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software; 2003.