Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Litjens, Geert ^a   Sánchez, Clara I ^a   Timofeeva, Nadya ^a   Hermsen, Meyke ^a   Nagtegaal, Iris ^a   Kovacs, Iringo ^b   Hulsbergen Van De Kaa, Christina ^a   Bult, Peter ^a   Van Ginneken, Bram ^a   Van Der Laak, Jeroen ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Amphia Breda Medical Center   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER STAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MACHINE LEARNING; MALE; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE TUMOR; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HISTOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MACHINE LEARNING; MALE; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY;

EID: 84970028091     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep26286     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Fischer, A. H., Jacobson, K. A., Rose, J. & Zeller, R. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of tissue and cell sections. CSH Protoc 2008, pdb. prot4986 (2008).
2. Epstein, J. I., Allsbrook, W. C., Amin, M. B. & Egevad, L. L. & ISUP Grading Committee. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 29, 1228-1242 (2005).
3. Genestie, C. et al. Comparison of the prognostic value of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson and nottingham histological grades in a series of 825 cases of breast cancer: major importance of the mitotic count as a component of both grading systems. Anticancer Res. 18, 571-576 (1998).
4. Weaver, D. L. Pathology evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer: protocol recommendations and rationale. Mod. Pathol. 23 Suppl 2, S26-S32 (2010).
5. Gurcan, M. N. et al. Histopathological image analysis: a review. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Reviews in 2, 147-171 (2009).
6. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature. 521, 436-444 (2015).
7. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Hinton, G. E. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 25, 1097-1105 (2012).
8. Szegedy, C. et al. Going deeper with convolutions. arXiv:14094842v1 (2014).
9. Ciresan, D. C., Giusti, A., Gambardella, L. M. & Schmidhuber, J. Mitosis detection in breast cancer histology images with deep neural networks. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 8150, 411-418 (2013).
10. Ciresan, D., Giusti, A., Gambardella, L. M. & Schmidhuber, J. Deep neural networks segment neuronal membranes in electron microscopy images. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 25, 2843-2851 (2012).
11. Wang, H. et al. Mitosis detection in breast cancer pathology images by combining handcrafted and convolutional neural network features. Journal of Medical Imaging 1, 034003-034003 (2014).
12. Cruz-Roa, A. et al. Automatic detection of invasive ductal carcinoma in whole slide images with convolutional neural networks. In SPIE Medical Imaging 904103-904103 (International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2014).
13. Ertosun, M. G. & Rubin, D. L. Automated grading of gliomas using deep learning in digital pathology images: A modular approach with ensemble of convolutional neural networks. In AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings vol. 2015, 1899 (American Medical Informatics Association, 2015).
14. Xu, J., Luo, X., Wang, G., Gilmore, H. & Madabhushi, A. A deep convolutional neural network for segmenting and classifying epithelial and stromal regions in histopathological images. Neurocomputing. 191, 214-223 (2016).
15. Su, H. et al. Robust cell detection and segmentation in histopathological images using sparse reconstruction and stacked denoising autoencoders. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv, 9351, 383-390 (2015).
16. Zlotta, A. R. & Nam, R. K. To biopsy or not to biopsy-thou shall think twice. Eur Urol. 61, 1115-7, discussion 1117-8 (2012).
17. Kim, T., Giuliano, A. E. & Lyman, G. H. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast carcinoma: a metaanalysis. Cancer. 106, 4-16 (2006).
18. Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. J. An introduction to the bootstrap vol. 57 (CRC press, 1994).
19. Chen, T. & Chefd'hotel, C. Deep learning based automatic immune cell detection for immunohistochemistry images In Machine Learning in Medical Imaging 17-24 (Springer, 2014).
20. Cruz-Roa, A. A., Arevalo Ovalle, J. E., Madabhushi, A. & González Osorio, F. A. A deep learning architecture for image representation, visual interpretability and automated basal-cell carcinoma cancer detection. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 8150, 403-410 (2013).
21. Reed, J. et al. Prognostic implications of isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in sentinel nodes of patients with invasive breast cancer: 10-analysis of patients enrolled in the prospective East Carolina University/Anne Arundel Medical Center Sentinel Node Multicenter Study. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 208, 333-340 (2009).
22. de Boer, M. et al. Micrometastases or isolated tumor cells and the outcome of breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 653-663 (2009).
23. de Boer, M., van Dijck, J. A., Bult, P., Borm, G. F. & Tjan-Heijnen, V. C. Breast cancer prognosis and occult lymph node metastases, isolated tumor cells, and micrometastases. J Natl. Cancer Inst. 102, 410-425 (2010).
24. Weaver, D. L. et al. Effect of occult metastases on survival in node-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 412-421 (2011).
25. Bergstra, J. et al. Theano: a CPU and GPU math expression compiler. In Proceedings of the Python for Scientific Computing Conference (SciPy) (2010).
26. Goodfellow, I. J. et al. Pylearn2: a machine learning research library. arXiv preprint arXiv:13084214 (2013).
27. Sermanet, P. et al. OverFeat: Integrated recognition, localization and detection using convolutional networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2014) (2014). Available at: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.6229v4.pdf (Accessed: April 20th 2016).