A Collaborative Approach for Scoping Ecosystem Services with Stakeholders: The Case of Arrábida Natural Park

Environmental Management

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 323-342

  Lopes, Rita ^a   Videira, Nuno ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Collaborative scoping; Identification of ecosystem services; Management of protected areas; Stakeholder participation

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FEEDBACK;

COLLABORATIVE APPROACH; COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; INNOVATIVE APPROACHES; PARTICIPATORY WORKSHOPS; PROTECTED AREAS; SCOPING; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION;

ECOSYSTEMS;

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; MARINE PARK; PERCEPTION; SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS; STAKEHOLDER;

DRIVER; ECOSYSTEM; EXERCISE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ORGANIZATION; PERCEPTION; PORTUGAL; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; SCREENING; WELLBEING; COOPERATION; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; PROCEDURES; RECREATIONAL PARK;

ARRABIDA NATURAL PARK; PORTUGAL; SETUBAL [PORTUGAL];

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; ECOSYSTEM; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONS; PARKS, RECREATIONAL; PORTUGAL;

EID: 84969920643     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: 14321009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0711-5     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Batista MI, Baeta F, Costa MJ, Cabral HN (2011) MPA as management tools for small-scale fisheries: the case study of Arrábida Marine Protected Area (Portugal). Ocean Coast Manag 54:137–147. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.10.032
2. Bremer L, Delevaux J, Leary J, Cox L, Oleson K (2015) Opportunities and strategies to incorporate ecosystem services knowledge and decision support tools into planning and decision making in Hawaii. Environ Manag 55:884–899
3. Burkhard B, Kandziora M, Hou Y, Muller F (2014) Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands—concepts for spatial localization, indication and quantification. Landsc Online 34:1–32. doi:10.3097/LO.201434
4. Cárcamo PF, Garay-Fluhmann R, Squeo FA, Gaymer CF (2014) Using stakeholders’ perspective of ecosystem services and biodiversity features to plan a marine protected area. Environ Sci Policy 40:116–131. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.03.003
5. Casado-Arzuaga I, Madariaga I, Onaindia M (2013) Perception, demand and user contribution to ecosystem services in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt. J Environ Manag 129:33–43. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.059
6. Chan KMA, Guerry AD, Balvanera P, Klain S, Satterfield T, Basurto X, Bostrom A, Chuenpagdee R, Gould R, Halpern SB, Hannahs N, Levine J, Norton B, Ruckelshaus M, Russel R, Tamn J, Woodsidem U (2012) Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. Bioscience 62(8):744–756. doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7
7. Clemente AS, Werner C, Máguas Cabral MS, Martins-Loução MA, Correia O (2004) Restoration of a Limestone Quarry: effect of soil amendments on the establishment of Native Mediterranean Sclerophyllous Shrubs. Restor Ecol 12(1):20–28. doi:10.1111/j.1061-2971.2004.00256.x
8. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, Van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260. doi:10.1038/387253a0
9. Cunha AH, Erzini K, Serrão EA, Gonçalves E, Borges R, Henriques M, Henriques V, Guerra M, Duarte C, Marbá N, Fonseca M (2014) Biomares, a LIFE project to restore and manage the biodiversity of Prof. Luiz Saldanha Marine Park. J Coast Conserv 18:643–655. doi:10.1007/s11852-014-0336-x
10. Darvill R, Lindo Z (2015) Quantifying and mapping ecosystem service use across stakeholder groups: implications for conservation with priorities for cultural values. Ecosyst Serv 13:153–161
11. De Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41(3):393–408
12. Dudley N (ed) (2008) Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. IUCN - International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland
13. Fisher J, Patenaude G, Giri K, Lewis K, Meir P, Pinho P, Rounsevell MDA, Williams M (2014) Understanding the relationships between ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: a conceptual framework. Ecosyst Serv 7:34–45. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.08.002
14. Fliervoet JM, Geerling GW, Mostert E, Smits AJM (2016) Analyzing collaborative governance through social network analysis: a case study of river management along the Waal River in The Netherlands. Environ Manag 57:355–367. doi:10.1007/s00267-015-0606-x
15. García-Nieto AP, García-Llorente M, Iniesta-Arandia I, Martín-López B (2013) Mapping forest ecosystem services: from providing units to beneficiaries. Ecosyst Serv 4:126–138. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.03.003
16. García-Nieto AP, Quintas-Soriano C, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Montes C, Martín-López B (2015) Collaborative mapping of ecosystem services: the role of stakeholders’ profiles. Ecosyst Serv 13:141–152. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.006
17. Gasparatos A (2010) Embedded value systems in sustainability assessment tools and their implications. J Environ Manag 91:1613–1622. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.014
18. Gómez-Baggethun E, Ruiz-Pérez M (2011) Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services. Prog Phys Geogr 35:617–632. doi:10.1177/0309133311421708
19. Gómez-Baggethun E, de Groot R, Lomas LP, Montes C (2010) The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payments schemes. Ecol Econ 69:1209–1218. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007
20. Hattam C, Atkins JP, Beaumont N, Börger T, Böhnke-Henrichs A, Burdon D, de Groot R, Hoefnagel E, Nunes PALD, Piwowarczyk J, Sastre S, Austen MC (2015) Marine ecosystem services: linking indicators to their classification. Ecol Indic 49:61–75. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.026
21. Howarth RB, Wilson MA (2006) A theoretical approach to deliberative valuation: aggregation by mutual consent. Land Econ 82(1):1–16
22. ICN (2003) Plano de Ordenamento do Parque Natural da Arrábida [Management Plan of Arrábida Natural Park]. Instituto de Conservação da Natureza. February 2003
23. ICNF (2015) Biodiversidade. Cartografia. Parque Natural da Arrábida [Biodiversity, Maps. Natural Park of Arrábida] Instituto de Conservação da Natureza e Florestas. www.icnf.pt
24. INE (2011) Census 2011. Statistics Portugal, Lisbon. www.ine.pt
25. Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Aguiler PA, Montes C, Martín-López B (2014) Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being. Ecol Econ 108:36–48. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.028
26. Jäger J, Bohunovsky L, Binder J (eds) (2008) Methods and tools for integrated sustainability assessment. Project summary. Sustainable Europe Research Institute, Vienna
27. Kallis G, Gómez-Baggethun E, Zografos C (2013) To value or not to value? That is not the question. Ecol Econ 94:97–105. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.002
28. Kandziora M, Burkhard B, Muller F (2013) Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators—a theoretical matrix exercise. Ecol Indic 28:54–78. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.006
29. Karrasch L, Klenke T, Woltjer J (2014) Linking the ecosystem services approach to social preferences and needs in integrated coastal land use management—a planning approach. Land Use Policy 38:522–532. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.12.010
30. Kenter JO, O’Brien L, Hockley N, Ravenscroft N, Fazey I, Irvine KN, Reed MS, Christie M, Brady E, Bryce R et al (2015) What are shared and social values of ecosystems? Ecol Econ 111:86–99. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.01.006
31. Kreakie BJ, Hychka KC, Belaire JA, Minor E, Walker HA (2015) Internet-based approaches to building stakeholder networks for conservation and natural resource management. Environ Manag 57(2):345–354. doi:10.1007/s00267-015-0624-8
32. Kumar M, Kumar P (2008) Valuation of the ecosystems services: a psycho-cultural perspective. Ecol Econ 64:808–819
33. Lopes R, Videira N (2013) Valuing marine and coastal ecosystem services: an integrated participatory framework. Ocean Coast Manag 84:153–162. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.08.001
34. Marega M, Urataric N (2011) Guidelines on stakeholder engagement in preparation of integrated management plans for protected areas. NATREG project. South East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme
35. Martínez-Alier J (2002) The environmentalism of the poor. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
36. Martín-López B, Gómez-Baggethun E, García-Llorente M (2014) Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecol Indic 37:220–228. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003
37. MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being, synthesis. Millennium ecosystem assessment. Island Press, Washington
38. Menzel S, Teng J (2010) Ecosystem services as a stakeholder-driven concept for conservation science. Conserv Biol 24(3):907–909. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01347.x
39. Moreno J, Palomo I, Escalera J, Martín-López B, Montes C (2014) Incorporating ecosystem services into ecosystem-based management to deal with complexity: a participative mental model approach. Landsc Ecol 29:1407–1421. doi:10.1007/s10980-014-0053-8
40. Nelson GC, Bennett E, Berhe AA, Cassman K, DeFries R, Dietz T, Dobermann A, Dobson A, Janetos A, Levy M, Marco D, Nakicenovic N, O’Neill B, Norgaard R, Petschel-Held G, Ojima D, Pingali P, Watson R, Zurek M (2006) Anthropogenic drivers of ecosystem change: an overview. Ecol Soc 11(2):29. doi:10.7916/D8125RDD
41. Novais MH, Santos I, Mendes S, Pinto-Gomes C (2004) Studies on pharmaceutical ethnobotany in Arrábida Natural Park (Portugal). J Ethnopharmacol 93:183–195. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2004.02.015
42. Palomo I, Montes C, Martín-López B, González JA, García-Llorente M, Alcorlo P, Mora MRG (2014) Incorporating the social–ecological approach in protected areas in the Antropocene. Bioscience 64(3):181–191. doi:10.1093/biosci/bit033
43. Potts T, Burdon D, Jackson E, Atkins J, Saunders J, Hastings E, Langmead O (2014) Do marine protected areas deliver flows of ecosystem services to support human welfare? Mar Policy 44:139–148. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2013.08.011
44. Quinn C, Quinn J, Halfacre A (2015) Digging deeper: a case study of farmer conceptualization of ecosystem services in the American South. Environ Manag 56:802–813
45. Riper CJ, Kyle GT (2014) Capturing multiple values of ecosystem services shaped by environmental worldviews: a spatial analysis. J Environ Manag 145:374–384. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.014
46. Rodríguez-Loinaz G, Alday JG, Onaindia M (2015) Multiple ecosystem services landscape index: a tool for multifunctional landscapes conservation. J Environ Manag 147:152–163. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.09.001
47. Scott JP, Carrington PJ (2011) The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. SAGE, Beverly Hills
48. Seppelt R, Dormann C, Eppink F, Lautenbach S, Schmidt S (2011) A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J Appl Ecol 48(3):630–636. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x
49. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T (2003) Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 13(11):2498–2504. doi:10.1101/gr.1239303
50. Spash CL (2008) How much is that ecosystem in the window? The one with the biodiverse trail. Environ Values 17:259–284
51. TEEB (2010) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity. Ecological and economics foundations. Earthscan, London
52. UK-NEA (2014) The UK National ecosystem assessment: synthesis of the key findings. UNEP-WCMC, LWEC, UK
53. Vatn A (2005) Rationality, institutions and environmental policy. Ecol Econ 55:203–217. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.001
54. Videira N, Antunes P, Santos R, Lobo G (2006) Public and stakeholder participation in European water policy: a critical review of project evaluation processes. Eur Environ 16:19–31. doi:10.1002/eet.401
55. Videira N, Lopes R, Antunes P, Santos R, Casanova J (2012) Mapping maritime sustainability issues with stakeholders groups. Syst Res Behav Sci 29:596–619. doi:10.1002/sres.2141
56. Villamagna AM, Mogollón B, Angermeier PL (2014) A multi-indicator framework for mapping cultural ecosystem services: the case of freshwater recreational fishing. Ecol Indic 45:255–265. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.001
57. Weaver P, Rotmans J (2006) Integrated sustainability assessment: what is it, why do it, and how? Int J Innov Sustain Dev 1(4):284–303. doi:10.1504/IJISD.2006.013732
58. Willemen L, Drakou EG, Dunbar MB, Mayaux P, Egoh BN (2013) Safeguarding ecosystem services and livelihoods: understanding the impact of conservation strategies on benefit flows to society. Ecosyst Serv 4:95–103. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.004
59. Zagarola JP, Anderson C, Veteto J (2014) Perceiving Patagonia: an assessment of social values and perspectives regarding watershed ecosystem services and management in southern South America. Environ Manag 53:769–782