Robotic surgery: current perceptions and the clinical evidence

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 255-263

  Ahmad, Arif ^a,b,c   Ahmad, Zoha F ^a   Carleton, Jared D ^a   Agarwala, Ashish ^a,b  

^a Mather Hospital Northwell Health   (United States)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Saint Charles Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

Laparoscopic surgery; Patient perception; Robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARDIOESOPHAGOMYOTOMY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; GASTRIC BYPASS SURGERY; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HERNIOPLASTY; HOSPITAL COST; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INFECTION RATE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PATIENT ATTITUDE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SURGICAL PATIENT; TACTILE STIMULATION; UROLOGICAL PROCEDURE; COMMUNITY HOSPITAL; COST; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; SURGICAL INFECTION; TOUCH;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; HOSPITALS, COMMUNITY; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; OPERATIVE TIME; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TOUCH;

EID: 84969765349     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4966-y     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Heemskerk J, Bouvy N, Baeten C (2014) The end of robotic-assisted laparoscopy? A critical appraisal of scientific evidence on the use of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 28:1388–1398
2. Badani KK, Bhandari A, Tewari A, Menon M (2005) Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional suturing: is there a difference in a robotic surgery setting? J Endourol 19:1212–1215
3. Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP (2004) Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 239:14–21
4. Herron DM, Marohn M (2008) The SAGES-MIRA Robotic Surgery Consensus Group. A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 22:313–325
5. Koughnett J, Jayaraman S, Eagleson R (2009) Are there advantages to robotic-assisted surgery over laparoscopy from the surgeon’s perspective? J Robot Surg 3:79–82
6. van der Schatte Olivier RH, van’t Hullenaar CDP, Ruurda JP, Broeders IAMJ (2009) Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1365–1371
7. Bultitude M, Murphy D, Challacombe B, Elhage O, Khan MS, Wang Q, Dasgupta P (2008) Patient perception of robotic urology. Br J Urol 103:285–288
8. Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, Dulabon LM, Patel MN, Lipkin M, Wang AJ, Stifelman MD (2009) Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol 182:866–873
9. Hu JC, Nelson RA, Wilson TG, Kawachi MH, Ramin SA, Lau C, Crocitto LE (2006) Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 75:541–546
10. Ng CK, Kauffman EC, Lee MM, Otto BJ, Portnoff A, Ehrlich JR, Schwartz MJ, Wang GJ, Scherr DS (2010) A comparison of postoperative complications in open versus robotic cystectomy. Eur Urol 57:274–281
11. Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA, Seshardi-Kreaden U, Hebert AE, Wiklund P (2012) Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62:1–15
12. Yu HY, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Kowalczyk KJ, Hu JC (2012) Use, costs, and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urologic surgery. Eur Urol 187:1392–1398
13. Packiam V, Bartlett DL, Tohme S, Reddy S, Marsh JW, Geller DA, Tsung A (2012) Minimally invasive liver resection: robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 12:2233–2238
14. Pasic RP, Rizzo JA, Fang H, Ross S, Moore M, Gunnarsson C (2010) Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gyencol 17:730–738
15. Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CC, Barber MD (2011) Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 118:1005–1013
16. Hubens G, Balliu L, Ruppert M, Gypen B, Van Tu T, Vaneerdeweg W (2008) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure performed with the da Vinci robot system: is it worth it? Surg Endosc 22:1690–1696
17. Pasic RP, Rizzo JA, Fang H, Ross S, Moore M, Gunnarsson C (2010) Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gyencol 17:730–738
18. Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, Burke WM, Lu YS, Neugut AI, Herzog TJ, Hershman DL (2013) Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA 309:689–698
19. Wright JD, Burke WM, Wilde ET, Lewin SN, Charles AS, Kim JH, Goldman N, Neugut AI, Herzog TJ, Hershman DL (2012) Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:784–791
20. Orady M, Hrynewych A, Nawfal AK, Wegienka G (2012) Comparison of robotic-assisted hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 16(4):542
21. Khan MS, Elhage O, Challacombe B, Rimington P, Murphy D, Dasgupta P (2011) Analysis of early complications of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy using a standardized reporting system. Urology 77(2):357–362
22. Moran PS, O’Neill M, Teljeur C, Flattery M, Murphy LA, Smyth G, Ryan M (2013) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open and laparoscopic approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Urol 20(3):312–321
23. Horgan S, Vanuno D (2001) Robots in Laparoscopic Surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 11:415–419
24. Masson-Lecomte A, Yates DR, Hupertan V, Haertig A, Chartier-Kastler E, Marc-Olivier B, Vaessen C, Roupret M (2013) A prospective comparison of the pathologic and surgical outcomes obtained after elective treatment of renal cell carcinoma by open or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Urol Oncol 31(6):924–929
25. Aboumarkzouk OM, Stein RJ, Eyraud R, Haber GP, Chlosta PL, Somani BK, Kaouk JH (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 62:1023–1033
26. Panumatrassamee K, Autorino R, Laydner H, Hillyer S, Khalifeh A, Kassab A, Stein RJ, Haber GP, Kaouk JH (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney: a single institution comparative analysis. Int J Urol 20:484–491
27. Barbash GI, Glied SA (2010) New technology and health care costs: the case of robotic-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 363:701–704
28. Schiavone MB, Kuo EC, Naumann RW, Burke WM, Lewin SN, Neugut AI, Hershman DL, Herzog TJ, Wright JD (2012) The commercialization of robotic surgery: unsubstantiated marketing of gynecological surgery by hospitals. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207:174.e1–174.e7
29. Nguyen PL, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, Choueiri TK, Choi WW, Lei Y, Hoffman KE, Hu JC (2011) Cost implications of the rapid adoption of newer technologies for treating prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:1517–1524
30. Wright JD, Burke WM, Wilde ET, Lewin SN, Charles AS, Kim JH, Goldman N, Neugut AI, Herzog TJ, Hershman DL (2012) Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:784–791
31. Weissman JS, Zinner M (2013) Comparative effectiveness research on robotic surgery. JAMA 309:721–722
32. Brody F, Richards NG (2014) Review of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 28:1413–1424
33. Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, von Felten S, Schar G (2012) Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 120:604–611
34. Corcione F, Esposito C, Curccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda N, Amato F, Pirozzi F, Caiazzo P (2005) Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 19:117–119
35. van der Meijden OA, Schijven MP (2009) The Value of Haptic Feedback in Conventional and Robot-Assisted Minimal Invasive Surgery and Virtual Reality Training: a Current Review. Surg Endosc 23:1180–1190
36. Hagen ME, Meehan JJ, Inan I, Morel P (2008) Visual cues act as a substitute for haptic feedback in robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 22:1505–1508
37. Jin LX, Ibrahim AM, Newman NA, Makarov DV, Pronovost PJ, Makary MA (2011) Robotic surgery claims on United States hospital websites. J Healthc Qual 33:48–52
38. Schiavone MB, Kuo EC, Naumann RW, Burke WM, Lewin SN, Neugut AI, Hershman DL, Herzog TJ, Wright JD (2012) The commercialization of robotic surgery: unsubstantiated marketing of gynecological surgery by hospitals. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207:174.e1–174.e7
39. Herron DM, Lantis JC, Maykel J, Basu C, Schwaitzberg SD (1999) The 3-D monitor and head-mounted display. A quantitative evaluation of advanced laparoscopic viewing techniques. Surg Endosc 13(8):751–755