Psychometric evaluation of the lower extremity computerized adaptive test, the modified harris hip score, and the hip outcome score

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 2, Issue 12, 2014, Pages

  Hung, Man ^a,b,c   Hon, Shirley D ^a,b   Cheng, Christine ^a,d   Franklin, Jeremy D ^a,b   Aoki, Stephen K ^a   Anderson, Mike B ^a   Kapron, Ashley L ^a   Peters, Christopher L ^a   Pelt, Christopher E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^d ROSEMAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

HOS; LE CAT; MHHS; PROMIS; Psychometrics; Rasch modeling

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HIP OUTCOME SCORE ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; HIP OUTCOME SCORE SPORT; HUMAN; LOWER EXTREMITY COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TEST; MALE; MODIFIED HARRIS HIP SCORE; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOMETRY; RELIABILITY; SPORT; VALIDITY;

EID: 84969311065     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23259671     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2325967114562191     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aprato A, Jayasekera N, Villar RN. Does the modified Harris hip score reflect patient satisfaction after hip arthroscopy? Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:2557-2560.
2. Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge; 2012.
3. Byrd JW, Jones KS. Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:578-587.
4. Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, et al; PROMIS Cooperative Group. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:1179-1194.
5. Cook KF, O'Malley KJ, Roddey TS. Dynamic assessment of health outcomes: time to let the CAT out of the bag? Health Serv Res. 2005;40:1694-1711.
6. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737-755.
7. Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Zajicek JP, Thompson AJ. Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:1094-1105.
8. Hung M, Baumhauer JF, Latt LD, Saltzman CL, SooHoo NF, Hunt KJ. Validation of PROMIS (R) Physical Function computerized adaptive tests for orthopaedic foot and ankle outcome research. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:3466-3474.
9. Hung M, Carter M, Hayden C, et al. Psychometric assessment of the Patient Activation Measure Short Form (PAM-13) in rural settings. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:521-529.
10. Hung M, Clegg DO, Greene T, Saltzman CL. Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function item bank in orthopaedic patients. J Orthop Res. 2011;29:947-953.
11. Hung M, Clegg DO, Greene T, Weir C, Saltzman CL. A lower extremity physical function computerized adaptive testing instrument for orthopaedic patients. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33:326-335.
12. HungM,FranklinJD,HonSD,ChengC,ConradJ,SaltzmanCL. Timefor a paradigm shift with computerized adaptive testing of general physical function outcomes measurements. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35:1-7.
13. Hung M, Hon SD, Franklin JD, et al. Psychometric properties of the PROMIS physical function item bank in patients with spinal disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39:158-163.
14. Hung M, Nickisch F, Beals TC, Greene T, Clegg DO, Saltzman CL. New paradigm for patient-reported outcomes assessment in foot & ankle research: computerized adaptive testing. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33:621-626.
15. Hung M, Stuart AR, Higgins TF, Saltzman CL, Kubiak EN. Computerized adaptive testing using the PROMIS Physical Function item bank reduces test burden with less ceiling effects compared to the short musculoskeletal function assessment in orthopaedic trauma patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:439-443.
16. Kemp JL, Collins NJ, Makdissi M, Schache AG, Machotka Z, Crossley K. Hip arthroscopy for intra-articular pathology: a systematic review of outcomes with and without femoral osteoplasty. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46:632-643.
17. Kemp JL, Collins NJ, Roos EM, Crossley KM. Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for hip arthroscopic surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:2065-2073.
18. Martin RL. Hip arthroscopy and outcome assessment. Oper Tech Orthop. 2005;15:290-296.
19. Martin RL, Kelly BT, Philippon MJ. Evidence of validity for the hip outcome score. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:1304-1311.
20. Martin RL, Philippon MJ. Evidence of validity for the hip outcome score in hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:822-826.
21. Martin RL, Philippon MJ. Evidence of reliability and responsiveness for the hip outcome score. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:676-682.
22. McHorney CA. Ten recommendations for advancing patient-centered outcomes measurement for older persons. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139: 403-409.
23. Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Mannion AF, Leunig M. Reproducibility, validity, and responsiveness of the hip outcome score in patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64:1770-1775.
24. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, et al. Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health. 2007;10(suppl 2):S125-S137.
25. Philippon MJ, Schenker ML, Briggs KK, Kuppersmith DA, Maxwell RB, Stubbs AJ. Revision hip arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35:1918-1921.
26. Potter BK, Freedman BA, Andersen RC, Bojescul JA, Kuklo TR, Murphy KP. Correlation of Short Form-36 and disability status with outcomes of arthroscopic acetabular labral debridement. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:864-870.
27. Rasch G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1960.
28. Revicki DA, Cella DF. Health status assessment for the twenty-first century: item response theory, item banking and computer adaptive testing. Qual Life Res. 1997;6:595-600.
29. Rose M, Bjorner JB, Becker J, Fries JF, Ware JE. Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61:17-33.
30. Safran MR, Hariri S. Hip arthroscopy assessment tools and outcomes. Oper Tech Orthop. 2010;20:264-277.
31. Schenker ML, Martin R, Weiland DE, Philippon MJ. Current trends in hip arthroscopy: a review of injury diagnosis, techniques, and outcome scoring. Curr Opin Orthop. 2005;16:89-94.
32. Tennant A, McKenna SP, Hagell P. Application of Rasch analysis in the development and application of quality of life instruments. Value Health. 2004;7(suppl 1):S22-S26.
33. Thorborg K, Roos EM, Bartels EM, Petersen J, Holmich P. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported outcome questionnaires when assessing hip and groin disability: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44:1186-1196.
34. Tijssen M, van Cingel R, van Melick N, de Visser E. Patient-reported outcome questionnaires for hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of the psychometric evidence. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:117.
35. Wright BD, Masters GN. Rating Scale Analysis. Chicago, IL: Mesa Press; 1982.