Psychometric properties of the promis physical function item bank in patients with spinal disorders

Spine

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 158-163

  Hung, Man ^a   Hon, Shirley D ^b   Franklin, Jeremy D ^b   Kendall, Richard W ^a   Lawrence, Brandon D ^a   Neese, Ashley ^a   Cheng, Christine ^a   Brodke, Darrel S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Orthopedic; Patient reported outcomes; Physical function; PROMIS; Psychometrics; Rasch; Spine

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SPINAL DISEASES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84895071685     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000097     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. McCormick JD, Werner BC, Shimer AL. Patient-reported outcome measures in spine surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2013; 21: 99-107.
2. Marshall S, Haywood K, Fitzpatrick R. Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. J Eval Clin Pract 2006; 12: 559-68.
3. Hung M, Clegg DO, Greene T, et al. Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function item bank in orthopaedic patients. J Orthop Res 2011; 29: 947-53.
4. Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 1179-94.
5. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care 2007; 45 ( suppl 1 ): S3-S11.
6. Choi SW. Firestar: computerized adaptive testing simulation program for polytomous item response theory models. Appl Psychol Meas 2009; 33: 644-5.
7. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patientbased outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1998; 2: i-iv, 1-74.
8. Fries JF, Bruce B, Cella D. The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005; 23 ( suppl 39 ): S53-7.
9. Revicki DA, Cella DF. Health status assessment for the twenty-first century: item response theory, item banking, and computer adaptive testing. Qual Life Res 1997; 6: 595-600.
10. Weiss DJ. Computerized adaptive testing for effective and efficient measurement in counseling and education. Meas Evaluation Couns Dev 2004; 37: 70-84.
11. Godil SS, Parker SL, Zuckerman SL, et al. Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy. Spine J 2013; 13: 1006-12.
12. Rose M, Bjorner JB, Becker J, et al. Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 17-33.
13. Gershon R, Rothrock NE, Hanrahan RT, et al. The development of a clinical outcomes survey research application: Assessment Center. Quality Life Res 2010; 19: 677-85.
14. Gershon RC, Rothrock N, Hanrahan R, et al. The use of PROMIS and assessment center to deliver patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research. J Appl Meas 2010; 11: 304-14.
15. Linacre JM. Understanding Rasch measurement: optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J Appl Meas 2002; 3: 85-106.
16. Hung M, Baumhauer JF, Latt LD, et al. Validation of PROMIS physical function computerized adaptive tests for orthopaedic foot and ankle outcome research. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471: 3466-74.
17. Hung M, Nickisch F, Beals TC, et al. New paradigm for patientreported outcomes assessment in foot & ankle research: computerized adaptive testing. Foot Ankle Int 2012; 33: 621-6.
18. Murphy KR, Davidshofer CO. Psychological Testing: Principles and Applications. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1998.
19. Shahgholi L, Yost KJ, Kallmes DF. Correlation of the National Institutes of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scales and standard pain and functional outcomes in spine augmentation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33: 2186-90.