Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-Indications and clinical experience

Neurology India

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 444-454

  Hari, Akshay ^a   Krishna, Murali ^a   Rajagandhi, Santhosh ^a   Rajakumar, Deshpande V ^a  

^a FORTIS HOSPITAL   (India)

Author keywords

Back pain; Degenerative disc disease; Minimally invasive; Radiculopathy; Spondylolisthesis; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; DISEASE DURATION; DURAL TEAR; FAILED BACK SURGERY SYNDROME; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RADICULAR PAIN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SURGICAL PATIENT; TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; COMPLICATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PROCEDURES; RADICULOPATHY;

BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; RADICULOPATHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS;

EID: 84969219500     PISSN: 00283886     EISSN: 19984022     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.181536     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bick EM. An essay on the history of spine fusion operations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1964;35:9-15.
2. Hibbs RA. An operation for progressive spinal deformities. N Y Med J 1911;21:1013-6.
3. Albee FH. Transplantation of a portion of the tibia into the spine for Pott's disease. JAMA 1911;57:855.
4. Burns BH. An operation for spondylolisthesis. Lancet 1933;224:1233.
5. Cloward RB. The treatment of ruptured lumbar intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion. I. Indications, operative technique, after care. J Neurosurg 1953;10:154-68.
6. White AH, Zucherman JF, Hsu K. Lumbosacral fusions with Harrington rods and intersegmental wiring. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;203:185-90.
7. Dove J. Internal fixation of the lumbar spine. The Hartshill rectangle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;203:135-40.
8. Harms J, Jeszenszky D. The unilateral transforaminal approach for posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Traumatol 1998;6:88-99.
9. Naderi S, Benzel EC. History of spine surgery. In: Benzel EC. Spine Surgery-Techniques, Complication Avoidance and Management. 3rd ed., Philadelphia: Elsevier. 2012:3-20.
10. Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2003;28:S26-35.
11. Wickham JE. The new surgery. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987;295:1581-2.
12. Park Y, Ha JW. Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 2007;32:537-43.
13. Isaacs RE, Podichetty VK, Santiago P, Sandhu FA, Spears J, Kelly K, et al. Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;3:98-105.
14. Moskowitz A. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Clin North Am 2002;33:359-66.
15. Potter BK, Freedman BA, Verwiebe EG, Hall JM, Polly DW Jr., Kuklo TR. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: Clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18:337-46.
16. Jhala A, Singh D, Mistry M. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: Results of 23 consecutive cases. Indian J Orthop 2014;48:562-7.
17. Kandwal P, Garg B, Upendra B, Chowdhury B, Jayaswal A. Outcome of minimally invasive surgery in the management of tuberculous spondylitis. Indian J Orthop 2012;46:159-64.
18. Park P, Foley KT. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis: Technique and outcomes after a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Neurosurg Focus 2008;25:E16.
19. Schizas C, Tzinieris N, Tsiridis E, Kosmopoulos V. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: Evaluating initial experience. Int Orthop 2009;33:1683-8.
20. Peng CW, Yue WM, Poh SY, Yeo W, Tan SB. Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa1976). 2009;34:1385-9.
21. Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Roeca CM, Nelson EL, Mason A. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Surg Neurol Int 2010;1:12.
22. Shunwu F, Xing Z, Fengdong Z, Xiangqian F. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases. Spine (Phila Pa1976). 2010;35:1615-20.
23. Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, Li CQ, Zheng WJ, Liu J. Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J 2010;19:1780-4.
24. Adogwa O, Parker SL, Bydon A, Cheng J, McGirt MJ. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011;24:479-84.
25. Park Y, Ha JW, Lee YT, Sung NY. Surgical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of spondylolisthesis and degenerative segmental instability. Asian Spine J 2011;5:228-36.
26. Rouben D, Casnellie M, Ferguson M. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A clinical and radiographic follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011;24:288-96.
27. Wang HL, Lu FZ, Jiang JY, Ma X, Xia XL, Wang LX. Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion via MAST Quadrant retractor versus open surgery: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Chin Med J (Engl) 2011;124:3868-74.
28. Kim JS, Jung B, Lee SH. Instrumented minimally invasive spinal-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF); minimum 5-years follow-up with clinical and radiologic outcomes. J Spinal Disord Tech 2012. [Epub ahead of print].
29. Lee KH, Yue WM, Yeo W, Soeharno H, Tan SB. Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 2012;21:2265-70.
30. Archavlis E, Carvi YN. Comparison of minimally invasive fusion and instrumentation versus open surgery for severe stenotic spondylolisthesis with high-grade facet joint osteoarthritis. Eur Spine J 2013;22 (8):1731-40.
31. Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Shau DN, Zuckerman SL, Godil SS, Cheng JS, McGirt MJ. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: Comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. World Neurosurg 2014;82:230-8.
32. Sonmez E, Coven I, Sahinturk F, Yilmaz C, Caner H. Unilateral percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation with minimally invasive TLIF for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disk disease: 2 years follow-up. Turk Neurosurg 2013;23:372-8.
33. Zairi F, Arikat A, Allaoui M, Assaker R. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: Comparison between open and mini-open approaches with two years follow-up. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2013;74:131-5.
34. Lubansu A, Gnanalingham K, Pereira P, Wimmer C. Evaluation of the complication rate after 500 minimally invasive spinal (MIS) procedures: A European multicenter prospective study-Presented at SMISS 2009 Annual Conference; 2009.
35. Min SH, Yoo JS. The clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 2013;22:1164-72.
36. Kim MC, Chung HT, Kim DJ, Kim SH, Jeon SH. The clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody single level fusion. Asian Spine J 2011;5:111-6.