Comparison of minimally invasive fusion and instrumentation versus open surgery for severe stenotic spondylolisthesis with high-grade facet joint osteoarthritis

European Spine Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1731-1740

  Archavlis, Eleftherios ^a   Carvi Y Nievas, Mario ^b  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Klinikum Traunstein   (Germany)

Author keywords

Facet joint osteoarthritis; Lumbar stenosis; Minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion; Spondylolisthesis

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FACET JOINT OSTEOARTHRITIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LEG PAIN; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDARTHROSIS; RADICULOPATHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; STENOTIC DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WOUND HEALING; BACK PAIN; COMORBIDITY; DEVICES; DISABILITY; INCIDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, SPINE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROCEDURES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPINAL STENOSIS; SPINE FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ZYGAPOPHYSEAL JOINT;

AGED; BACK PAIN; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; COMORBIDITY; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; OPERATIVE TIME; OSTEOARTHRITIS, SPINE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPINAL FUSION; SPINAL STENOSIS; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ZYGAPOPHYSEAL JOINT;

EID: 84881545608     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: 14320932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2732-6     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Dhall SS, Wang MY, Mummaneni PV (2008) Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 9(6):560-565
2. Gelalis ID, Arnaoutoglou C, Christoforou G, Lykissas MG, Batsilas I, Xenakis T (2010) Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 44(3):235-240
3. Holly LT, Schwender JD, Rouben DP, Foley KT (2006) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: indications, technique, and complications. Neurosurg Focus 20(3):E6
4. Hsieh PC, Koski TR, Sciubba DM, Moller DJ, O'Shaughnessy BA, Li KW, Gokaslan ZL, Ondra SL, Fessler RG, Liu JC (2008) Maximizing the potential of minimally invasive spine surgery in complex spinal disorders. Neurosurg Focus 25(2):E19
5. Logroscino CA, Proietti L, Pola E, Scaramuzzo L, Tamburrelli FC (2011) A minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spine instabilities. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 1):S41-S45
6. Lowe TG, Tahernia AD, O'Brien MF, Smith DA (2002) Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): indications, technique, and 2-year results. J Spinal Disord Tech 15(1):31-38
7. Mummaneni PV, Rodts GE Jr (2005) The mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 57(4 Suppl):256-261
8. Oppenheimer JH, De Castro I, McDonnell DE (2009) Minimally invasive spine technology and minimally invasive spine surgery: a historical review. Neurosurg Focus 27(3):E9
9. Park P, Foley KT (2008) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis: technique and outcomes after a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Neurosurg Focus 25(2):E16
10. Park Y, Ha JW, Lee YT, Oh HC, Yoo JH, Kim HB (2011) Surgical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of spondylolisthesis and degenerative segmental instability. Asian Spine J 5(4):228-236
11. Pathria M, Sartoris DJ, Resnick D (1987) Osteoarthritis of the facet joints: accuracy of oblique radiographic assessment. Radiology 164(1):227-230
12. Peng CW, Yue WM, Poh SY, Yeo W, Tan SB (2009) Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 34(13):1385-1389
13. Potter BK, Freedman BA, Verwiebe EG, Hall JM, Polly DW Jr, Kuklo TR (2005) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:337-346
14. Quante M, Kesten H, Richter A, Halm H (2012) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Orthopade 41(2):153-162
15. Rosenberg WS, Mummaneni PV (2001) TLIF: technique, complications, and early results. Neurosurgery 48:569-574
16. Ryang YM, Oertel MF, Mayfrank L, Gilsbach JM, Rohde V (2008) Standard open microdiscectomy versus minimal access trocar microdiscectomy: results of a prospective randomized study. Neurosurgery 62(1):174-181
17. Salehi SA, Tawk R, Ganju A, LaMarca F, Liu JC, Ondra SL (2004) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: surgical technique and results in 24 patients. Neurosurgery 54:368-374
18. Scheufler KM, Dohmen H, Vougioukas VI (2007) Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability. Neurosurgery 60(4 Suppl 2):203-212
19. Schizas C, Michel J, Kosmopoulos V, Theumann N (2007) Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw insertion in percutaneous posterior transpedicular stabilization. EurSpine J 16(5):613-617
20. Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A, Tansey R, Wardlaw D, Smith FW, Kulik G (2010) Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(21):1919-1924
21. Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, Foley KT (2005) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(Suppl):S1-S6
22. Scott J, Huskisson EC (1976) Graphic representation of pain. Pain 2(2):175-184
23. Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, Li CQ, Zheng WJ, Liu J (2010) Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J 19(10):1780-1784
24. Wang MY, Cummock MD, Yu Y, Trivedi RA (2010) An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 12(6):694-699
25. Weiner BK, Nguyen HV, Hazard SW (2006) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: an independent assessment of outcomes in a difficult patient population. Med Sci Monit 12:CR99-CR102
26. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Zhao W, Blood EA, Tosteson AN, Birkmeyer N, Herkowitz H, Longley M, Lenke L, Emery S, Hu SS (2009) Surgical compared with non operative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(6):1295-1304
27. Whitecloud TS 3rd, Davis JM, Olive PM (1994) Operative treatment of the degenerated segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19(5):531-536
28. Whitecloud TS 3rd, Roesch WW, Ricciardi JE (2001) Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis. J Spinal Disord 14(2):100-103
29. Wood MJ, Mannion RJ (2010) Improving accuracy and reducing radiation exposure in minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 12(5):533-539