Information bias in health research: Definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods

Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare

Volumn 9, Issue , 2016, Pages 211-217

  Althubaiti, Alaa ^a  

^a KING SAUD BIN ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY FOR HEALTH SCIENCES   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Confirmation bias; Measurement error bias; Misclassification; Recall bias; Self report bias; Social desirability bias

Indexed keywords

AWARENESS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONFIRMATION BIAS; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; HEALTH CARE PRACTICE; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MEDICAL RESEARCH; RECALL BIAS; SELF REPORT; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; STUDY DESIGN;

EID: 84968820499     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11782390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S104807     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Hennekens CH, Buring JE. Epidemiology in Medicine. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company; 1987.
2. Gerhard T. Bias: considerations for research practice. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65(22):2159–2168.
3. Pannucci CJ, Wilkins EG. Identifying and avoiding bias in research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(2):619–625.
4. Choi BCK, Pak AWP. Bias, Overview. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd; 2005.
5. Zhu K, McKnight B, Stergachis A, Daling JR, Levine RS. Comparison of self-report data and medical records data: results from a case-control study on prostate cancer. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28(3):409–417.
6. Magura S, Kang SY. Validity of self-reported drug use in high risk populations: a meta-analytical review. Subst Use Misuse. 1996;31(9):1131–1153.
7. Harrison L. The validity of self-reported drug use in survey research: an overview and critique of research methods. In: Harrison L, Hughes A, editors. The Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey Estimates NIDA Research Monograph no 167. Rockville, MD; 1997:17–36.
8. Darke S. Self-report among injecting drug users: a review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1998;51(3):253–263.
9. Brener ND, Billy JOG, Grady WR. Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: evidence from the scientific literature. J Adolesc Health. 2003;33(6):436–457.
10. Mills JF, Loza W, Kroner DG. Predictive validity despite social desirability: evidence for the robustness of self-report among offenders. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2006;13(2):140–150.
11. van de Mortel TF. Faking it: social desirability response bias in self-report research. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2008;25(4):40–48.
12. Harrison LD, Hughes A, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health (U.S.). The Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey Estimates. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Division of Epidemiology and Prevention Research; 1997.
13. Schütz H, Gotta JC, Erdmann F, Risse M, Weiler G. Simultaneous screening and detection of drugs in small blood samples and bloodstains. Forensic Sci Int. 2002;126(3):191–196.
14. Ledgerwood DM, Goldberger BA, Risk NK, Lewis CE, Kato Price R. Comparison between self-report and hair analysis of illicit drug use in a community sample of middle-aged men. Addict Behav. 2008;33(9):1131–1139.
15. Stephens R. The truthfulness of addict respondents in research projects. Int J Addict. 1972;7(3):549–558.
16. Kassin SM, Dror IE, Kukucka J. The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2013;2(1):42–52.
17. Crowne DP, Marlowe D. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J Consult Psychol. 1960;24:349–354.
18. Paulhus DL. Measurement and control of response bias. In: Robinson JP, Shaver PR, Wrightsman LS, editors. Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1991.
19. Holmberg L, Ohlander EM, Byers T, et al. A search for recall bias in a case-control study of diet and breast cancer. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25(2):235–244.
20. Neugebauer R, Ng S. Differential recall as a source of bias in epidemiologic research. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(12):1337–1341.
21. Kip KE, Cohen F, Cole SR, et al; Herpetic Eye Disease Study Group. Recall bias in a prospective cohort study of acute time-varying exposures: example from the herpetic eye disease study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(5):482–487.
22. Fuller WA. Measurement Error Models. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 1987.
23. Nusser SM, Fuller WA, Guenther PM. Estimating usual dietary intake distributions: adjusting for measurement error and nonnormality in 24-hour food intake data. In: Lyberg L, Biemer P, Collins M, De Leeuw E, Dippo C, Schwarz N, Trewin D, editors. Survey Measurement and Process Quality. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 1997.
24. Paeratakul S, Popkin BM, Kohlmeier L, Hertz-Picciotto I, Guo X, Edwards LJ. Measurement error in dietary data: implications for the epidemiologic study of the diet-disease relationship. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998;52(10):722–727.
25. Ribi CH, Zakotnik JM, Vertnik L, Vegnuti M, Cappuccio FP. Salt intake of the Slovene population assessed by 24 h urinary sodium excretion. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13(11):1803–1809.
26. Bryant HE, Visser N, Love EJ. Records, recall loss, and recall bias in pregnancy: a comparison of interview and medical records data of pregnant and postnatal women. Am J Public Health. 1989;79(1):78–80.
27. Feldman Y, Koren G, Mattice D, Shear H, Pellegrini E, MacLeod SM. Determinants of recall and recall bias in studying drug and chemical exposure in pregnancy. Teratology. 1989;40(1):37–45.
28. Coughlin SS. Recall bias in epidemiologic studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(1):87–91.
29. Weinstock MA, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Speizer FE. Recall (report) bias and reliability in the retrospective assessment of melanoma risk. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133(3):240–245.
30. Paganini-Hill A, Chao A. Accuracy of recall of hip fracture, heart attack, and cancer: a comparison of postal survey data and medical records. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;138(2):101–106.
31. Biemer PP, Groves RM, Lyberg LE, Mathiowetz NA, Sudman S. Measurement Errors in Surveys. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 1991.
32. Carroll RJ, Freedman LS, Kipnis V. Measurement error and dietary intake. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998;445:139–145.
33. Thomson CA, Giuliano A, Rock CL, et al. Measuring dietary change in a diet intervention trial: comparing food frequency questionnaire and dietary recalls. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(8):754–762.
34. Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Stefanski LA, Crainiceanu CM. Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models. 2nd ed. New York: Chapman and Hall; 2006.
35. Althubaiti A, Donev AN. Mixture experiments with mixing errors. J Stat Plan Infer. 2011;141(2):692–700.
36. Althubaiti A, Donev A. Non-Gaussian Berkson errors in bioassay. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016;25(1):430–445.
37. Okura Y, Urban LH, Mahoney DW, Jacobsen SJ, Rodeheffer RJ. Agreement between self-report questionnaires and medical record data was substantial for diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke but not for heart failure. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(10):1096–1103.
38. Gullberg RG. Estimating the measurement uncertainty in forensic blood alcohol analysis. J Anal Toxicol. 2012;36(3):153–161.
39. Moroni R, Blomstedt P, Wilhelm L, Reinikainen T, Sippola E, Corander J. Statistical modelling of measurement errors in gas chromatographic analyses of blood alcohol content. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;202(1–3):71–74.
40. Dror IE, Charlton D. Why experts make errors. J Forensic Ident. 2006;56(4):600–616.
41. Gullberg RG. Estimating the measurement uncertainty in forensic breath-alcohol analysis. Accred Qual Assur. 2006;11(11):562–568.
42. Dror I, Rosenthal R. Meta-analytically quantifying the reliability and biasability of forensic experts. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53(4):900–903.
43. Carroll RJ. Measurement error in epidemiologic studies. In: Armitage P, Colton T, editors. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1998:2491–2519.
44. Nickerson RS. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol. 1998;2(2):175–220.
45. Berner ES, Graber ML. Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. Am J Med. 2008;121(5 Suppl):S2–S23.
46. Croskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad Med. 2003;78(8):775–780.
47. Reid MC, Lachs MS, Feinstein AR. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. JAMA. 1995;274(8):645–651.
48. Hill C, Memon A, McGeorge P. The role of confirmation bias in suspect interviews: A systematic evaluation. Legal Criminal Psych. 2010;13(2):357–371.
49. Butt L. The forensic confirmation bias: problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions – Commentary by a forensic examiner. J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2013;2(1):59–60.
50. Nakhaeizadeh S, Dror IE, Morgan RM. Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: Visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias. Sci Justice. 2014;54(3):208–214.
51. Goodyear-Smith FA, van Driel ML, Arroll B, Del Mar C. Analysis of decisions made in meta-analyses of depression screening and the risk of confirmation bias: a case study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:76.
52. Budowle B, Bottrell MC, Bunch SG. A perspective on errors, bias, and interpretation in the forensic sciences and direction for continuing advancement. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54(4):798–809.
53. Rassin E. Individual differences in the susceptibility to confirmation bias. Neth J Psychol. 2008;64(2):87–93.
54. Powell MB, Hughes-Scholes CH, Sharman SJ. Skill in interviewing reduces confirmation bias. J Investig Psych Offender Profil. 2012;9(2):126–134.
55. Dror IE, Busemeyer JR, Basola B. Decision making under time pressure: an independent test of sequential sampling models. Mem Cognit. 1999;27(4):713–725.