A perspective on errors, bias, and interpretation in the forensic sciences and direction for continuing advancement

Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 798-809

  Budowle, Bruce ^a   Bottrell, Maureen C ^a   Bunch, Stephen G ^a   Fram, Robert ^a   Harrison, Diana ^a   Meagher, Stephen ^a   Oien, Cary T ^a   Peterson, Peter E ^a   Seiger, Danielle P ^a   Smith, Michael B ^a   Smrz, Melissa A ^a   Soltis, Greg L ^a   Stacey, Robert B ^a  

^a FBI LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

confirmation bias; context bias; education; error; ethics; Forensic science; interpretation; training

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; FORENSIC SCIENCE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; VALIDATION STUDY;

ACCREDITATION; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); EDUCATION, CONTINUING; ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL; EXPERT TESTIMONY; FORENSIC SCIENCES; HUMANS; LABORATORIES; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 67650669017     PISSN: 00221198     EISSN: 15564029     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01081.x     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Stacey RB. A report on the erroneous fingerprint individualization in the Madrid train bombing case. J Forensic Identif 2004 54 (6 706 18.
2. Sheck B, Neufeld P, Dwyer J. Actual innocence. New York, NY : New American Library, Penguin Putnam, Inc., 2000.
3. Saks MJ, Koehler JJ. The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science. Science 2005 309 : 892 5.
4. Bottrell MC. Forensic glass comparison: background information used in data interpretation. Forensic Sci Commun 2009 11 (2 http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/ fsc.
5. Bunch SG, Smith ED, Giroux BN, Murphy PD. Is a match really a match? A primer on the procedures and validity of firearm and toolmark identification. Forensic Sci Commun 2009 11 (3 http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc.
6. Harrison D, Burkes TM, Seiger DP. Handwriting examination: meeting the challenges of science and the law. Forensic Sci Commun 2009 11 (4 http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc.
7. Oien CT. Forensic hair comparison: background information for interpretation. Forensic Sci Commun 2009 11 (2 http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc.
8. Peterson PE, Dreyfus CB, Gische MR, Hollars M, Roberts MA, Ruth RM, et al. Latent prints: the state of the science. Forensic Sci Commun 2009 11 (4 http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc.
9. Smith MB. The forensic analysis of footwear impression evidence. Forensic Sci Commun 2009 11 (4 http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc.
10. Budowle B, Allard MW, Wilson MR, Chakraborty R. Forensics and mitochondrial DNA: applications, debates, and foundations. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2003 4 : 119 41.
11. Bird SJ. Scientific certainty: research versus forensic perspectives. J Forensic Sci 2001 46 (4 978 81.
12. ISO/IEC. ISO/IEC 17025:2005 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland : ISO Copyright Office, Reference Number ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), 2005.
13. Budowle B, SWGMGF Members. Quality assurance guidelines for laboratories performing microbial forensic work. Forensic Sci Commun 2003 5 (4 at http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc/backissu/oct2003/index.htm.
14. Budowle B, Smith JA, Moretti T, DiZinno J. DNA typing protocols: molecular biology and forensic analysis. Natick, MA : BioTechniques Books, BioForensic Sciences Series, Eaton Publishing, 2000.
15. The International Association for Identification. Scientific Working Group Documents. http://www.theiai.org (accessed October 3, 2008).
16. American Society of Quality (ASQ), Plan-do-check-act cycle. http://www.asq.org (accessed October 3, 2008).
17. Six sigma, http://www.isixsigma.com/sixsigma/six-sigma.asp (accessed October 3, 2008).
18. ASCLD/LAB. Supplemental requirements for the accreditation of forensic science testing and calibration laboratories. ASCLD/LAB-International supplemental requirements, 2006, AL-PD-3003-Ver 2.1. Garner, NC : ASCLD/LAB, 2006.
19. ILAC. Guidelines for forensic science laboratories, ILAC-G19, 2002, http://www.ilac.org/documents/g19-2002.pdf.
20. FQS-I 17025 Accreditation, http://www.forquality.org (accessed October 3, 2008).
21. Texas Code Crim. P. Ann. Art. 38.35, 2005.
22. Oklahoma Stat Ann. Tit. Forensic Laboratory Accreditation Act §74-150.37, 2002.
23. N.Y. Crim. Proc. §995-b.
24. Koehler JJ, Chia A, Lindsey S. The random match probability (RMP) in DNA evidence: irrelevant and prejudicial? Jurimetrics J 1995 35 : 201 19.
25. National Research Council II Report. The evaluation of forensic evidence. Washington, DC : National Academy Press, 1996.
26. Thompson WC. Subjective interpretation, laboratory error and the value of forensic DNA evidence: three case studies. Genetica 1995 96 : 153 68.
27. Thompson WC, Taroni F, Aitken CG. How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence. J Forensic Sci 2003 48 : 47 54. (Pubitemid 36084080)
28. Harmon R, Budowle B. Questions about forensic science. Science 2006 311 : 607. (Pubitemid 43191286)
29. Grieve DL. Possession of truth. J Forensic Identif 1996 46 : 521 8.
30. Peterson JL, Lin G, Ho M, Chen Y, Gaensslen RE. The feasibility of external blind DNA proficiency testing. I. Background and findings. J Forensic Sci 2003 48 (1 21 31. (Pubitemid 36084077)
31. Houck MM, Budowle B. Correlation of microscopic and mitochondrial DNA hair comparisons. J Forensic Sci 2002 47 : 964 7.
32. Byrd JS. Confirmation bias, ethics, and mistakes in forensics. J Forensic Identif 2006 56 : 511 25.
33. Saviano J. The pursuit of objectivity in the examination of forensic evidence. J Forensic Identif 2006 56 (6 877 84.
34. Moretti TR, Baumstark AL, Defenbaugh DA, Keys KM, Budowle B. Validation of short tandem repeats (STRs) for forensic usage: performance testing of fluorescent multiplex STR systems and analysis of authentic and simulated forensic samples. J Forensic Sci 2001 46 : 647 60.
35. Moretti TR, Baumstark AL, Defenbaugh DA, Keys KM, Budowle B. Validation of STR typing by capillary electrophoresis. J Forensic Sci 2001 46 : 661 76.
36. Nisbett RE, Ross L. Human inference: strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1980.
37. Dror IE, Charlton D, Péron A. Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications. Forensic Sci Int 2006 156 : 74 8.
38. Dror IE, Charlton D. Why experts make errors. J Forensic Identif 2006 56 : 600 16.
39. Saks MJ, Risinger DM, Rosenthal R, Thompson WC. Context effects in forensic science: a review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United States. Sci Justice 2003 43 : 77 90. (Pubitemid 37047358)
40. Krane DE, Ford S, Gilder JR, Inman K, Jamieson A, Koppl R, et al. Sequential unmasking: a means of minimizing observer effects in forensic DNA interpretation. J Forensic Sci 2008 53 : 1006 7.
41. Office of the Inspector General. The FBI Laboratory: an investigation into laboratory practices and alleged misconduct in explosives-related and other cases. Washington, DC : US Department of Justice, 1997.
42. Stafford Smith CA, Goodman PD. Forensic hair comparison analysis: nineteenth century science or twentieth century snake oil? Columbia Human Rights Law Rev 1996 27 : 227 91.
43. Robertson J. Forensic and microscopic examination of human hair. In : Robertson J, editor. Forensic examination of hair. London : Taylor and Francis, 1999 79 154.
44. Evett IW, Weir BS. Interpreting DNA evidence. Sunderland, MA : Sinauer Associates Inc., 1998.
45. SWGMAT. Expert reporting guideline. Forensic Sci Commun 2009 11 (1 http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc/current/standards/2009-01-standards02.htm.
46. U.S. Department of Justice. Education and training in forensic science: a guide for forensic science laboratories, educational institutions, and students. Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, 2004.
47. Siegel JA. The appropriate educational background for entry level forensic scientists: a survey of practitioners. J Forensic Sci 1988 33 : 1065 8.
48. Aitken CGG, Taroni F. Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists, 2nd ed. West Sussex : John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2004.
49. Lucy D. Introduction to statistics for forensic scientists. West Sussex : John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005.
50. Taroni F, Aitken CGG, Garbolino P, Biedermann A. Bayesian networks and probabilistic inference in forensic science. West Sussex : John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2006.
51. FEPAC. http://www.aafs.org/default.asp?section-id=aafs&page-id= committee&subpage-id=fepac (accessed July 31, 2008).
52. Almirall JR, Furton KG. Trends in forensic science education: expansion and increased accountability. Anal Bioanal Chem 2003 376 : 1156 9.
53. Scientific Working Group for Materials Analysis (SWGMAT). Forensic fiber examiner training program. Forensic Sci Commun 2005 7 (2 http://lab.fbinet.fbi/ library/fsc/backissu/april2005/standards/SWGMAT-fiber-training-program.pdf.
54. Fleckstein MP, Martone M, Pitluck HM. Law, ethical codes, and the report of the CSSP survey on ethics policies. J Forensic Sci 2001 46 : 982 5.
55. Peterson JL. Teaching ethics in a forensic science curriculum. J Forensic Sci 1988 33 : 1081 5.
56. http://www.waduicenter.com/toolbox/documents/ASCLD-labmgtguide.pdf (accessed July 31, 2008).
57. National Research Council. Forensic analysis: weighing bullet lead evidence. Washington, DC : National Academy Press, 2004.
58. National Research Council. Committee to assess the feasibility, accuracy and technical capability of a national ballistics database. Washington, DC : National Academy Press, 2008.
59. Bodziak WJ. Footwear impression evidence: detection, recovery, and examination, 2nd ed. Boca Raton : CRC Press, 2000 347.
60. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. User verification of performance for precision and trueness; approved guideline, 2nd ed. Wayne, PA : Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI Document EP15-A2), 2005.
61. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Genotyping for infectious diseases: identification and characterization; approved guideline. Wayne, PA : Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI Document MM10-A), 2006.
62. Budowle B, Chakraborty R, Carmody G, Monson KL. Source attribution of a forensic DNA profile. Forensic Sci Commun 2000 2, http://www.fbi.gov/programs/ lab/fsc/current/budowle.htm.
63. Evett IW, Williams RL. A review of the sixteen points fingerprint standard in England and Wales. J Forensic Identif 1996 46 : 49 73. (Pubitemid 26191110)
64. International Association for Identification. Standardization committee report. FBI Law Enforcement Bull 1973 42 : 7 8.
65. Vanderkolk JR. Forensic individualization of images using quality and quantity of information. J Forensic Identif 1999 49 (3 246 56.
66. Budowle B, Buscaglia J, Schwartz Perlman R. Review of the scientific basis for friction ridge comparisons as a means of identification: committee findings and recommendations. Forensic Sci Commun 2006 8, http://www.fbi.gov/hq/ lab/fsc.