The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions - Commentary by a forensic examiner

Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 59-60

  Butt, Leonard ^a  

^a not available   (United States)

Author keywords

Analyst; Bias; Contextual; Examiner; Forensic science; Impact

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875302053     PISSN: 22113681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.012     Document Type: Note

References (3)

1. Kassin S.M., Dror I., Kukucka J. The forensic confirmation bias: Problem, perspective, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 2013, 2(1):42-52.
2. Langenburg G. A performance study of the ACE-V process: A pilot study to measure the accuracy, precision, reproducibility, repeatability, and biasability of conclusions resulting from the ACE-V process. Journal of Forensic Identification 2009, 59(2):219-257.
3. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Expert Working Group on Human Factors in Latent Print Analysis. Latent print examination and human factors: Improving the practice through a systems approach 2012, U.S. Department of Commerce, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD.