Technology transfers of Chinese universities: Is mode 2 sufficient for a developing country?

New Technologies in Global Societies

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 21-50

  Hong, Wei ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84968724734     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1142/9789812773555_0002     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Adams, J. D. and A. B. Jaffe. 1996. "Bounding Effects of R&D: An Investigation Using Matched Establishment-Firm Data." Rand Journal ofEconomics 27: 700-721.
2. Agrawal, A. and R Henderson. 2002. "Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT." Management Science 48: 44-60.
3. Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM). 1995. "AUTM Licensing Survey." Norwalk, CT: AUTM.
4. AUTM. 2002. AUTM Licensing Survey: Norwalk, CT: AUTM.
5. Audretsch, D. B. and M. P. Feldman. 1996. "R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production." American Economic Review 86: 630-640.
6. Beesley, L. G. A. 2003. "Science Policy in Changing Times: Are Governments Poised to Talk Full Advantage of an Institution in Transition?" Research Policy 32: 1519-1531.
7. Bekelman, J. E., Y. Li and C. P. Gross. 2003. "Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research." Journal of the American Medical Association 289: 454-465.
8. Benner, M. and U. Sandstrom. 2000. "Institutionalizing the Triple Helix: Research Funding and Norms in the Academic System." Research Policy 29: 291-301.
9. Blumenthal, D., N. Causino, E. Campbell and K. S. Louis. 1996. "Relationships between Academic Institutions and Industry in the Life Sciences: An Industry Survey. " New England Journal ofMedicine 334: 368-373.
10. Blumenthal, D., M. Gluck, K. S. Louis and D. Wise. 1986. "Industrial Support of University Research in Biotechnology." Science 231: 242-246.
11. Breschi, S., F. Lissoni and F. Montobbio. 2004. "Open Science and University Patenting: A Bibliometric Analysis of die Italian Case." In 10th International J. A. Schumpeter Society Conference: Innovation, Industrial Dynamics and Structural Transformation Schumpeterian Legacies. Milan.
12. Brooks, H. 1994. "The Relationship between Science and Technology." Research Policy 23: 477-186.
13. Bush, V. 1945. "Science, die Endless Frontier: A Report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research." Washington, D. C: U.S. Government Printing Office.
14. Campbell, E. G., B. R. Clarridge, M. Gokhale, L. Birenbaum, S. Flilgartner, N. A. Holtzman and D. Blumendial. 2002. "Data Withholding in Academic Genetics." JAMA 287: 473-80.
15. Chinese Education Ministry. 1999. The 50-year Development of Science and Technology in Chinese Universities. Beijing, China: The Higher Education Press.
16. Chinese Education Ministry. 2001. "Statistics on Higher Education for the Past 50 Years."
17. Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levindial. 1990. "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation." Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128-152.
18. Cohen, W. M., R. Florida, L. Randazzese and J. P. Walsh. 1998. "Industry and the Academy: Uneasy Partners in die Cause of Technological Advance." In Challenges to Research Universities, edited by R. G. Noll. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
19. Cohen, W. M., R. R Nelson and J. P. Walsh. 2002. "Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D." Management Science 48: 1-23.
20. Colyvas, J., M. Crow, A. Gelijns, R. Mazzoleni, R. R. Nelson, N. Rosenberg and B. N. Sampat, 2002. "How do University Inventions Get into Practice?" Management Science 48: 61-72.
21. Cook-Deegan, R. Mullan and S. J. McCormack. 2001. "Patents, Secrecy and DNA." Science 293: 217.
22. Etzkowitz, H. and L. Leydesdorff. 2000. "The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations." Research Policy 29: 109-123.
23. Bekelman, J. E., Y. Li and C. P. Gross. 2003. "Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research." Journal of the American Medical Association 289: 454-465.
24. Benner, M. and U. Sandstrom. 2000. "Institutionalizing the Triple Helix: Research Funding and Norms in the Academic System." Research Policy 29: 291-301.
25. Blumenthal, D., N. Causino, E. Campbell and K. S. Louis. 1996. "Relationships between Academic Institutions and Industry in the Life Sciences: An Industry Survey. " New England Journal ofMedicine 334: 368-373.
26. Blumenthal, D., M. Gluck, K. S. Louis and D. Wise. 1986. "Industrial Support of University Research in Biotechnology." Science 231: 242-246.
27. Breschi, S., F. Lissoni and F. Montobbio. 2004. "Open Science and University Patenting: A Bibliometric Analysis of die Italian Case." In 10th International J. A. Schumpeter Society Conference: Innovation, Industrial Dynamics and Structural Transformation Schumpeterian Legacies. Milan.
28. Brooks, H. 1994. "The Relationship between Science and Technology." Research Policy 23: 477-186.
29. Bush, V. 1945. "Science, die Endless Frontier: A Report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research." Washington, D. C: U.S. Government Printing Office.
30. Campbell, E. G., B. R. Clarridge, M. Gokhale, L. Birenbaum, S. Flilgartner, N. A. Holtzman and D. Blumendial. 2002. "Data Withholding in Academic Genetics." JAMA 287: 473-80.
31. Chinese Education Ministry. 1999. The 50-year Development of Science and Technology in Chinese Universities. Beijing, China: The Higher Education Press.
32. Chinese Education Ministry. 2001. "Statistics on Higher Education for the Past 50 Years."
33. Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levindial. 1990. "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation." Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128-152.
34. Cohen, W. M., R. Florida, L. Randazzese and J. P. Walsh. 1998. "Industry and the Academy: Uneasy Partners in die Cause of Technological Advance." In Challenges to Research Universities, edited by R. G. Noll. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
35. Cohen, W. M., R. R Nelson and J. P. Walsh. 2002. "Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D." Management Science 48: 1-23.
36. Colyvas, J., M. Crow, A. Gelijns, R. Mazzoleni, R. R. Nelson, N. Rosenberg and B. N. Sampat, 2002. "How do University Inventions Get into Practice?" Management Science 48: 61-72.
37. Cook-Deegan, R. Mullan and S. J. McCormack. 2001. "Patents, Secrecy and DNA." Science 293: 217.
38. Etzkowitz, H. and L. Leydesdorff. 2000. "The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations." Research Policy 29: 109-123.
39. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). 2003. Turning Science into Business: Patenting and, Licensing at Public Research Organisations. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
40. Owen-Smith, J. and W. W. Powell. 2001. "To Patent or Not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer." Journal of Technology Transfer 26: 99-114.
41. Rosenberg, N. and R. R. Nelson. 1994. "American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry." Research Policy 23: 323-348.
42. Stokes, D. 1997. Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
43. The Chinese Statistics Bureau. 2001. "National R&D Expenditures in 2000." http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjgb/rdpcgb/qgrdpcgb/t20020331_15466.htm.
44. Thursby, J. G. and M. C. Thursby. 2002. "Who is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growdi in University Licensing." Management Science 48: 90-104.
45. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). 2002. "U.S. Colleges and Universities-Utility Patent Grants, Calendar Years 1969-2000. "
46. Walsh, J. P. and W Hong. 2003. "Secrecy is Increasing in Step with Competition." Nature 422: 801-802.
47. Young, T. A. 1999. "Personal Impressions of China." The Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers XI. http://www.autm.net/pubs/journal/99/china.html.