Implementing the internet learning environment into the chemistry curriculum in high schools in Israel

Technology-Rich Learning Environments: A Future Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 209-234

  Kesner, Miri ^a   Frailich, Marcel ^a   Hofstein, Avi ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967386484     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1142/9789812564412_0010     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Abad, VJ. (1999). Hebdo-Chim, a Web application to support learning in a chemistry methods pre-service course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 283-290.
2. Adar, L. (1969). A theoretical framework for the study of motivation in education. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University. (In Hebrew).
3. Alister, B. F. (1999). Colleges should tap the pedagogical potential of the World Wide Web. Chronicle of Higher Education. 48, 8.
4. Aksela, M., & Meisalo, V. (2001). School chemistry in inspiring ways: a web-based investigative environment for interactive chemistry education. In A, F. Cachapuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Chemical Education. Aveiro, Portugal, University of Aveiro.
5. Bamea, N., & Dori, Y. J. (1999). High-school chemistry students’ performance and gender differences in a computerized molecular modeling learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 4, 257-271.
6. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-41.
7. Carpi, A. (2001). Improvements in undergraduate science education using web-based instructional modules. Journal of Chemical Education, 78, 1709-1712.
8. Gagen, M. (2001). The molecular world: a new, integrated, multimedia- rich course from the UK Open University. In A, F. Cachapuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Chemical Education. Aveiro, Portugal, University of Aveiro.
9. Hofstein, A., & Kempa, R. F. (1985). Motivating aspects in science education: An attempt at an analysis. European Journal of Science Education, 7, 221-229.
10. Hofstein, A., & Walberg H, J. (1995). Instructional strategies. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Improving Science Education. The NSSE Yearbook. Chicago, IL: The International Academy of Education.
11. Johnstone, A. H., Percival, F., & Reid, N. (1981). Is knowledge enough? Studies in Higher Education, 6, 77-84.
12. Kempa, R. F. (1983). Developing new perspectives in chemical education. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference in Chemistry, Education, and Society (pp. 34-42). Montpellier, France.
13. Kempa, R.F., & Diaz, M. (1990). Motivational traits and preferences for different instructional modes in science. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 195-203.
14. Kennedy, M. M. (1998, April). The relevance of content in in-service teacher education. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
15. Kesner, M., Hofstein, A., & Ben-Zvi, R. (1997a). The development and implementation of two industrial chemistry case studies for the Israeli high school chemistry curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19 (5), 565-576.
16. Kesner, M., Hofstein, A., & Ben-Zvi, R. (1997b). Student and teacher perceptions of industrial chemistry case studies. International Journal of Science Education, 19 (6), 725-738.
17. Krajcik, J. Mamlok, R., & Hug, B. (2001) Learning science through inquiry. In L. Como (Ed.), Education Across a Century: The Centennial Volume. The NSSE Yearbook, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
18. Krajcik, J. S. (2000). Advantages and challenges of using the world- wide-web to foster sustained science inquiry in middle and high school classrooms. Keynote speech, Taipei: Taiwan.
19. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, B. Marx, R., & Soloway, E. (2000). Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In Minstrell, J. & Van Zee, E. (Eds.). Inquiring into inquiry: Science learning and teaching (pp. 283-315), Washington, D.C: American Association for the Advancement of Science Press.
20. Lookatch, R.P. (1995). The strange but true story of multimedia and the type 1 error. Technos, 4, 10-13.
21. National Research Council (1996). The National Science Education Standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
22. “Tomorrow 98” (1992). Report of the superior committee on science and technology education. Jerusalem: The Ministry of Education and Culture (English version).
23. Williams, S. M., & Hmelo, C. E. (1998). Guest editors’ introduction. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 265-270.
24. Yaron, D., Freeland, R., Lang D., & Milton J. (2000). Using simulations to transform the nature of chemistry homework. A progress report, Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.