Integrating decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory model and failure mode and effect analysis to determine the priority in solving production problems

Advances in Mechanical Engineering

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 1-12

  Lee, Yu Cheng ^a   Chu, Wen Hua ^a   Chen, Quan ^b   Tsai, Sang Bing ^b,c,d,e   Wang, Jiangtao ^b   Dong, Weiwei ^f  

^a CHUNG HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRONIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^c DONGGUAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^d DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^e NANKAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^f SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Decision making; Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory; Failure mode and effect analysis; High technology manufacturers; Production problems

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967334644     PISSN: 16878132     EISSN: 16878140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1687814016641011     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Jordan WE., Failure model effects and criticality analysis. In: Proceedings of the annual reliability and maintainability symposium, 1972, pp. 30-37.
2. MIL-STD-1629A:1980. Procedures for performing a failure mode, effects, and critically analysis. (Washington, DC: Department of Defense).
3. Dhillon BS., Failure modes and effects analysis-bibliography. Microelectron Reliab 1992; 32: 719-731.
4. Stamatis DH., Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press, 1995.
5. Onodera K,. Effective techniques of FMEA at each life-cycle stage. In: Proceedings of the annual reliability and maintainability symposium, Philadelphia, PA, 13-16 January 1997, pp. 50-56. New York: IEEE.
6. Reliey TT., FMEA in preventing medical accidents. In: Proceedings of the ASQ annual quality congress, 2002, pp. 657-664.
7. Linton JD., Facing the challenges of service automation: an enabler for e-commerce and productivity gain in traditional services. IEEE T Eng Manage 2003; 50: 478-484.
8. Reiling JG, Knutzen BL, Stoecklein M., FMEA-the cure for medical errors. Qual Prog 2003; 36: 67-71.
9. Shahin A., Integration of FMEA and the Kano model: an exploratory examination. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 2005; 21: 731-746.
10. Vandenbrande W., Design of experiments for dummies. Qual Prog 2005; 38 (4): 59-65.
11. Sawhney R, Padiyar A, Li Y,. FMEA based approach for supplier development. In: Proceedings of the IIE annual conference and exhibition, 2004, pp. 7-16. Norcross, GA: Institute of Industrial Engineers.
12. Lee CY, Chen JK., Utility priority number evaluation for FMEA. J Fail Anal Prev 2007; 7: 321-328.
13. Xia T, Xi L, Zhou X,. Condition-based maintenance for intelligent monitored series system with independent machine failure modes. Int J Prod Res 2013; 51: 4585-4596.
14. Tipton E., Stratified sampling using cluster analysis: a sample selection strategy for improved generalizations from experiments. Evaluation Rev 2013; 37: 109-139.
15. Li YF, Huang HZ, Zhang H,. Fuzzy sets method of reliability prediction and its application to a turbocharger of diesel engines. Adv Mech Eng 2013; 5: 216192-1-216192-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/216192
16. Yuan X, Wang Y, Gu Y., Software fault location of CNC system based on similar path set and artificial neural network. Adv Mech Eng 2013; 5: 357308-1-357308-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/357308
17. Hedberg EC, Hedges LC., Reference values of within-district intraclass correlations of academic achievement by district characteristics: results from a meta-analysis of district-specific values. Evaluation Rev 2014; 38: 546-582.
18. Chang KU, Chang YC, Lai PT., Applying the concept of exponential approach to enhance the assessment capability of FMEA. J Intell Manuf 2014; 25: 1413-1427.
19. Gabus A, Fontela E,. Perceptions of the world problematique: communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility. DEMATEL report no. 1, 1973. Geneva: Battelle Geneva Research Center.
20. Tamura H, Nagata H, Akazawa K., Stochastic DEMATEL for a structural modeling of a complex problematique for realizing safe, secure and reliable society. J Telecommun Inform Technol 2005; 4: 139-146.
21. Hajime Y, Kenichi I, Hajime M., An innovative product development process for resolving fundamental conflicts. J Jpn Soc Precis Eng 2005; 71: 216-222.
22. Nanayo F, Toshiaki T., A new method of paired comparison by improved DEMATEL method: application to the integrated evaluation of a medical information which has multiple factors. Jpn J Med Inform 2002; 22: 211-216.
23. Lee YC, Hsieh YF., Integration of revised simultaneous importance performance analysis and decision making trial and evaluation laboratory-a study of mobile telecommunication industry in Taiwan. Afr J Bus Manag 2011; 5: 2312-2321.
24. Tsai SB, Lee YC, Wu CH,. Examining how manufacturing corporations win orders. S Afr J Ind Eng 2013; 24: 112-124.
25. Wu WW, Lee YT., Developing global managers' competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Syst Appl 2007; 32: 499-507.
26. Kim YH., Study on impact mechanism for beef cattle fanning and importance of evaluating agricultural information in Korea using DEMATEL, PCA and AHP. Agric Inform Res 2006; 15: 267-280.
27. Tsai SB, Saito R, Lin YC,. Discussing measurement criteria and competitive strategies of green suppliers from a green law perspective. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2015; 229: 135-145.
28. Tsai SB, Xue YZ, Huang PY,. Establishing a criteria system for green production. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2015; 229: 1395-1406.
29. Wu WW., Segmenting critical factors for successful knowledge management implementation using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Appl Soft Comput 2012; 12: 527-535.
30. Sarashk MV, Khanmohammadi S, Alborzi M., A new fuzzy-dynamic risk and reliability assessment. Decis Sci Lett 2014; 3: 431-438.
31. Patil SK, Kant R., A hybrid approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL and FMCDM to predict success of knowledge management adoption in supply chain. Appl Soft Comput 2014; 18: 126-235.
32. Tsai SB, Chien MF, Xue Y,. Using the fuzzy DEMATEL to determine environmental performance: a case of printed circuit board industry in Taiwan. PLoS ONE 2015; 10: e0129153.
33. Guo JJ, Tsai SB., Discussing and evaluating green supply chain suppliers: a case study of the printed circuit board industry in China. S Afr J Ind Eng 2015; 26: 56-67.
34. Guo W-F, Zhou J, Yu C-L,. Evaluating the green corporate social responsibility of manufacturing corporations from a green industry law perspective. Int J Prod Res 2015; 11: 96-115.