Robotics Technology in Mental Health Care

Artificial Intelligence in Behavioral and Mental Health Care

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 185-203

  Riek, Laurel D ^a  

^a University of Notre Dame   (United States)

Author keywords

Human robot interaction; Robotics; Social robotics; Social technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967329171     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-420248-1.00008-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (70)

1. Aarons G.A. Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: The evidence-based practice attitude scale (ebpas). Mental Health Services Research 2004, 6(2):61-74.
2. Arkin, R. C. (2014). Ameliorating patient-caregiver stigma in early-stage Parkinson's disease using robot co-mediators. Proceedings of the AISB 50 Symposium on Machine Ethics in the Context of Medical and Health Care Agents, London, UK, April 2014.
3. Banks M.R., Willoughby L.M., Banks W.A. Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: Use of robotic versus living dogs. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2008, 9(3):173-177.
4. Bartneck, C. (2008). Who like androids more: Japanese or US Americans? In The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 553-557). IEEE.
5. Bemelmans R., Gelderblom G.J., Jonker P., de Witte L. Socially assistive robots in elderly care: A systematic review into effects and effectiveness. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2012, 13(2):114-120.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2010.10.002.
6. Broekens J., Heerink M., Rosendal H. Assistive social robots in elderly care: A review. Gerontechnology 2009, 8(2):94-103. doi:10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.002.00.
7. Chang, W.-L., & Šabanović, S. (2015). Interaction expands function: Social shaping of the therapeutic robot paro in a nursing home. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 343-350). ACM.
8. Chau P.Y., Hu P.J.-H. Investigating healthcare professionals decisions to accept telemedicine technology: An empirical test of competing theories. Information & Management 2002, 39(4):297-311.
9. Damm, O., Malchus, K., Jaecks, P., Krach, S., Paulus, F., Naber, M., et al. (2013). Different gaze behavior in human-robot interaction in asperger's syndrome: An eye tracking study. In IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 368-369). IEEE.
10. Deegan P.E. Spirit breaking: When the helping professions hurt. The Humanistic Psychologist 1990, 18(3):301-313.
11. Diehl, J. J., Crowell, C. R., Villano, M., Wier, K., Tang, K., & Riek, L. D. (2014). Clinical applications of robots in autism spectrum disorder diagnosis and treatment. In Comprehensive guide to autism (pp. 411-422). Springer.
12. Dorais, G., Bonasso, R. P., Kortenkamp, D., Pell, B., & Schreckenghost, D. (1999). Adjustable autonomy for human-centered autonomous systems. In Working Notes of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Workshop on Adjustable Autonomy Systems (pp. 16-35).
13. Feil-Seifer, D., & Matarić, M. J. (2009). Toward socially assistive robotics for augmenting interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. In Experimental robotics (pp. 201-210). Springer.
14. Forlizzi, J., & DiSalvo, C. (2006). Service robots in the domestic environment: A study of the roomba vacuum in the home. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 258-265). ACM.
15. Gockley, R., Bruce, A., Forlizzi, J., Michalowski, M., Mundell, A., Rosenthal, S. et al. (2005). Designing robots for long-term social interaction. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, (IROS) (pp. 1338-1343). IEEE.
16. Gonzales M., Moosaei M., Riek L. A novel method for synthesizing naturalistic pain on virtual patients. Simulation in Healthcare 2013, 8(6). doi:10.1097/01.SIH.0000441715.40653.4e.
17. Goodrich M.A., Colton M., Brinton B., Fujiki M., Atherton J.A., Robinson L., et al. Incorporating a robot into an autism therapy team. IEEE Intelligent Systems 2012, 27(2):52-60.
18. Goodrich M.A., Schultz A.C. Human-robot interaction: A survey. Foundations and Trends in Human-computer Interaction 2007, 1(3):203-275.
19. Hansen N.B., Lambert M.J., Forman E.M. The psychotherapy dose-response effect and its implications for treatment delivery services. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 2002, 9(3):329-343.
20. Hayes, C., & Riek, L. D. (2014). Establishing human personality metrics for adaptable robots during learning tasks. In AAAI Fall Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Human Robot Interaction. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/FSS/FSS14/rt/captureCite/9213/0.
21. Heider F., Simmel M. An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology 1944, 243-259.
22. Hornyak T.N. Loving the machine 2006, Kodansha International, Tokyo, Japan.
23. Iqbal, T., & Riek, L. (2014). Assessing group synchrony during a rhythmic social activity: A systemic approach. In 6th Conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies (ISGS). San Diego, CA, 74.
24. Iqbal T., Riek L.D. A method for automatic detection of psychomotor entrainment. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2015 2015, Available from: .
25. Iqbal, T., Gonzales, M. J., & Riek, L. D. (2015). Joint action perception to enable fluent human-robot teamwork. In Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. Kobe, Japan, Aug, 2015. IEEE.
26. Jacobson J.W., Foxx R.M., Mulick J.A. Controversial therapies for developmental disabilities: Fad, fashion, and science in professional practice 2005, CRC Press, New Jersey, NY, USA.
27. Kidd, C. D., & Breazeal, C. (2008). Robots at home: Understanding long-term human-robot interaction. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 3230-3235). IEEE.
28. Kozima H., Michalowski M.P., Nakagawa C. Keepon. International Journal of Social Robotics 2009, 1(1):3-18.
29. Kwakkel G., Kollen B.J., Krebs H.I. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2007, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17876068.
30. Lancioni G., Sigafoos J, O'Reilly M., Singh N. Assistive technology: Interventions for individuals with severe/profound and multiple disabilities 2012, Springer, New York, NY, USA.
31. Lavelle M., Healey P.G., McCabe R. Is nonverbal communication disrupted in interactions involving patients with schizophrenia?. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2013, 39(5).
32. Lavelle M., Healey P.G., McCabe R. Participation during first social encounters in schizophrenia. PloS One 2014, 9(1):e77506.
33. Lee, H. R., Sung, J., Sabanovic, S., & Han, J. (2012). Cultural design of domestic robots: A study of user expectations in korea and the united states. In IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 803-808). IEEE.
34. Leite, I., Martinho, C., Pereira, A., & Paiva, A. (2009). As time goes by: Long-term evaluation of social presence in robotic companions. In IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 669-674). IEEE.
35. Levinson W., Gorawara-Bhat R., Lamb J. A study of patient clues and physician responses in primary care and surgical settings. The Journal of the American Medical Association 2012, 284(8):1021-1027.
36. Lo A.C., Guarino P.D., Richards L.G., Haselkorn J.K., Wittenberg G.F., Federman D.G., et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. New England Journal of Medicine 2010, 362(19):1772-1783.
37. Lok B., Ferdig R.E., Raij A., Johnsen K., Dickerson R., Coutts J., et al. Applying virtual reality in medical communication education: Current findings and potential teaching and learning benefits of immersive virtual patients. Virtual Reality 2006, 10(3-4):185-195.
38. Mason J., Scior K. Diagnostic overshadowingamongst clinicians working with people with intellectual disabilities in the UK. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2004, 17(2):85-90.
39. Matarić M., Tapus A., Winstein C., Eriksson J. Socially assistive robotics for stroke and mild TBI rehabilitation. Advanced Technologies in Rehabilitation 2009, 145:249-262.
40. May C., Gask L., Atkinson T., Ellis N., Mair F., Esmail A. Resisting and promoting new technologies in clinical practice: The case of telepsychiatry. Social Science & Medicine 2001, 52(12):1889-1901.
41. Meeks D.W., Smith M.W., Taylor L., Sittig D.F., Scott J.M., Singh H. An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety concerns. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2014, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24951796.
42. Michaud, F., Duquette, A., & Nadeau, I. (2003). Characteristics of mobile robotic toys for children with pervasive developmental disorders. In IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (Vol. 3, pp. 2938-2943). IEEE.
43. Montague E., Asan O. Dynamic modeling of patient and physician eye gaze to understand the effects of electronic health records on doctor-patient communication and attention. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2014, 83(3):225-234.
44. Moosaei, M., Gonzales, M., & Riek, L. (2014). Naturalistic pain synthesis for virtual patients. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (pp. 1-14).
45. Mordoch E., Osterreicher A., Guse L., Roger K., Thompson G. Use of social commitment robots in the care of elderly people with dementia: A literature review. Maturitas 2013, 74(1):14-20.
46. Pohl F. Gateway 1977, St. Martin's Press, New York.
47. Rack, S., Iqbal, T., & Riek, L. D. (2015). Enabling Synchronous Joint Action in Human-Robot Teams. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts (HRI'15 Extended Abstracts). (pp. 153-154): ACM Press.
48. Riek L.D. Wizard of oz studies in HRI: A systematic review and new reporting guidelines. Journal of Human Robot Interaction 2012, 1:119-136.
49. Riek, L. D. (2013). The social co-robotics problem space: Six key challenges. In Proceedings of Robotics: Science, and Systems (RSS), Robotics Challenges and Visions. Berlin, Germany.
50. Riek, L. D., Adams, A., & Robinson, P. (2011). Exposure to cinematic depictions of robots and attitudes towards them. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Workshop on Expectations and Intuitive Human-Robot Interaction. Lausanne, Switzerland.
51. Riek, L. D., Hartzog, W., Howard, D., Moon, A., & Calo, R. (2015). The emerging policy and ethics of human robot interaction. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 247-248). ACM.
52. Riek L.D., Howard D. A code of ethics for the human-robot interaction profession. We Robot 2014, 2014:1-10.
53. Riek, L. D., Mavridis, N., Antali, S., Darmaki, N., Ahmed, Z., Al-Neyadi, M., et al. (2010). Ibn Sina steps out: Exploring arabic attitudes toward humanoid robots. In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 88-99).
54. Riek, L. D., Rabinowitch, T.-C., Chakrabarti, B., & Robinson, P. (2009). Empathizing with robots: Fellow feeling along the anthropomorphic spectrum. In 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII) (pp. 1-6).
55. Riek, L. D., & Robinson, P. (2011). Using robots to help people habituate to visible disabilities. In IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
56. Rizzo A. Virtual reality and disability: Emergence and challenge. Disability & Rehabilitation 2002, 24(11-12):567-569.
57. Robins B., Dautenhahn K. Tactile interactions with a humanoid robot: Novel play scenario implementations with children with autism. International Journal of Social Robotics 2014, 1-19.
58. Robinson H., MacDonald B., Broadbent E. Physiological effects of a companion robot on blood pressure of older people in residential care facility: A pilot study. Australasian Journal on Ageing 2014, 34(1):27-32. doi:10.1111/ajag.12099.
59. Robinson H., MacDonald B., Kerse N., Broadbent E. The psychosocial effects of a companion robot: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2013, 14(9):661-667.
60. Scassellati B., Admoni H., Mataric M. Robots for use in autism research. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 2012, 14:275-294.
61. Shibata T. Therapeutic seal robot as biofeedback medical device: Qualitative and quantitative evaluations of robot therapy in dementia care. Proceedings of the IEEE 2012, 100(8):2527-2538.
62. Shibata T., Wada K. Robot therapy: A new approach for mental healthcare of the elderly - a mini-review. Gerontology 2011, 57(4):378-386.
63. Siciliano B., Khatib O. Springer handbook of robotics 2008, Springer.
64. Sirkin, D., & Ju W. (2014). "Using embodied design improvisation as a design research tool." In Proc. Int'l. Conf. on Human Behavior in Design, Ascona, Switzerland.
65. Sung J.-Y., Guo L., Grinter R.E., Christensen H.I. My roomba is ramboi: intimate home appliances 2007, Springer.
66. Tamura T., Yonemitsu S., Itoh A., Oikawa D., Kawakami A., Higashi Y., et al. Is an entertainment robot useful in the care of elderly people with severe dementia?. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2004, 59(1):M83-M85.
67. Tanaka M., Ishii A., Yamano E., Ogikubo H., Okazaki M., Kamimura K., et al. Effect of a human-type communication robot on cognitive function in elderly women living alone. Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research 2012, 18(9):CR550-CR557.
68. Vanderborght B., Simut R., Saldien J., Pop C., Rusu A.S., Pintea S., et al. Using the social robot probo as a social story telling agent for children with ASD. Interaction Studies 2012, 13(3):348-372.
69. Wang, L., Rau, P.-L. P., Evers, V., Robinson, B. K., & Hinds, P. (2010). When in rome: the role of culture & context in adherence to robot recommendations. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 359-366). IEEE Press.
70. Waytz A., Cacioppo J.T., Epley N. Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2010, 5:219-232.