Data mining, surveillance, and discrimination in the post-9/11 environment

The New Politics of Surveillance and Visibility

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 363-384

  Gandy, Oscar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967144513     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (74)

1. Adams, N.M., D.J. Hand, and R.J. Till. 2001. ‘Mining for Classes and Patterns in Behavioural Data.’ Journal of the Operational Research Society 52:1017-24. Aristotle International, Inc. 2002. US voter lists. Aristotle International, Inc. http: //www.aristotleonline.com/voterlists.html.
2. Baard, E. 2002. ‘Your Grocery List Could Spark a Terror Probe: Buying Trouble’ Village Voice. 30 July, http://www.oas.villagevoice.com/issues/0230/baard.html.
3. Baker, K., and S. Baker. 1999. ‘Divide and Conquer.’ Journal of Business Strategy 20:16-18.
4. Belgum, K.D. 1999. ‘Who Leads at Half-time?: Three Conflicting Visions of Internet Privacy Policy’ Richmond Journal of Law and Technology 6:1.
5. Bowker, G.C., and S. Leigh Star. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Bruening, P., and A. Schwartz. 2002. ‘Privacy and Online Politics: Is Online Profiling Doing More Harm Than Good for Citizens in Our Political System?’ Washington, DC: George Washington University Graduate School of Political Management, http://www.democracyonline.org.
7. Carbone, P. 2000. ‘What Is the Origin of Data Mining?’ The Edge 4:2-12.
8. Center for Democracy and Technology. 2002. CDT’s Analysis of New TBI guidelines: Center for Democracy and Technology, http://www.cdt.org/wiretap/020530guidelines.shmtl.
9. CFO Research Services. 2002. Mining the Value in CRM Data: A CFO Perspective. Boston, MA: CFO Publishing Corporation, http://www.cfo.com.
10. Computer Science and Telecommunications Board. 2000. Summary of a Workshop on Information Technology Research for Federal Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11. Computer Science and Telecommunications Board -2002. Cyber-security Today and Tomorrow. Pay Now or Pay Later. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
12. Coppola, V. 2002. ‘Derek Smith’s Brave New World.’ In Georgia Trend ChoicePoint, Inc.ttp://www.choicepoint.net/news/gatrend.html.
13. Danna, A., and O.H. Gandy Jr. 2002. ‘All That Glitters Is Not Gold: Digging Beneath the Surface of Data mining.’ Journal of Business Ethics 40:373-86.
14. Darling, C.B. 1997. ‘Datamining for the Masses.’ Datamation. (Feb.): 52-4.
15. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). 2002. BAA 02-08 Information Awareness Proposer Information Pamphlet. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense.
16. Dror, Y. 2003. ‘Big Brother Is Watching You - And Documenting: EBay, Ever Anxious to Up Profits, Bends over Backwards to Provide Data to Law Enforcement Officials.’ Haaretz.com.http://www.haaretz.com.
17. Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC). 2003. EPIC Analysis of Total Information Awareness Contractor Documents. Washington, DC: Electronic Privacy Information Center, http://www.epic.org/privacy/profiling/tia/doc_analysis.html.
18. Eskridge, W.N. Jr. 2001. ‘Channelling: Identity-based Social Movements and Public Law.’ University of Pennsylvania Law Review 150:419-525.
19. Federal Trade Commission, U.S. 2000. Online Profiling: A Report to Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Consumer Protection.
20. Ferguson, S.D. 2000. Researching the Public Opinion Environment: Theories and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Flaherty, D.H. 1989. Protecting Privacy in Surveillance Societies: The Federal Republic of Germany, Sweden, France, Canada, and the United States. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
22. Fraim, J. 2002. ‘Electronic Symbols: Internet words and Culture.’ June 2002. ttp://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_6/fraim/index.html.
23. Frank, R.E., and M.G. Greenberg. 1980. The ublic’s Use of Television. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
24. Franklin, D. 2002. ‘Data Miners: New Software Instantly Connects Key Bits of Data That Once Eluded Teams of Researchers.’ Time.com, 15 Dec. http://www.time.com/globalbusiness/printout/0,8816,400017,00.html.
25. Fulda, J. 2000. ‘Data mining and Privacy.’ Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology 11:105-13.
26. Gandy, O.H. Jr. 1993. The Panoptic Sort: A Political Economy of Personal Information. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
27. Gandy, O.H. Jr.1996. ‘Legitimate Business Interest: No End in Sight? An Inquiry into the Status of Privacy in Cyberspace.’ University of Chicago Legal Forum 1996: 77137.
28. Gandy, O.H. Jr.2000. ‘Exploring Identity and Identification in Cyberspace.’ Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 14:1085-1111.
29. Gandy, O.H. Jr.2001. ‘Dividing Practices: Segmentation and Targeting in the Emerging Public Sphere.’ In W.L. Bennet and R.M. Entman, eds., Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy, 141-59. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Garver, M.S. 2002. ‘Try New Data-mining Techniques.’ Marketing News (16 Sept.): 31-3
31. Gigerenzer, G., Z. Swijtink, T. Porter, L. Daston, J. Beatty, and L. Kruger. 1989. The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Google, Inc. 2001. ‘Google Acquires Usenet Discussion Service and Significant Assets from Deja.com.’ http://www.google.com/press/pressrel/pressrelease48.html
33. Greening, D.R. 2000. ‘Data mining on the Web. There’s Gold in That Mountain of Data.’ New Architect, http://www.webtechniques.com/archives/2000/01/greening.
34. Gross, G. 2003. ‘US Senate Blocks Government Data-mining Plan.’ InfoWorld Daily News. 24 Jan. Washington, DC. http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/01/24/030124hntia_l.html.
35. Harper, R. 1986. Mailing List Strategies. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36. Hatch, M. 2001. ‘Electronic Commerce in the 21st Century: The Privatization of Big Brother: Protecting Sensitive Personal Information from Commercial Interests in the 21st Century.’ William Mitchell Law Review 27:1457-1502.
37. Helling, B. 1998. ‘Web-site Sensitivity to Privacy Concerns: Collecting Personally Identifiable Information and Passing Persistent Cookies.’ First Monday. ttp:www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue3_2/helling/index.html.
38. Hobart, M.E., and Z.S. Schiffman. 1998. Information Ages: Literacy, Numeracy, and the Computer Revolution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
39. Hula, K.W. 1999. Lobbying Together: Interest Group Coalitions in Legislative Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
40. Hull, D. 2002. ‘Libraries Face Privacy Test: Anti-terrorism Law Used to Demand Records.’ Mercury News, 18 Oct. http://www.bayarea.com/mid/mercurynews/news/local/4312790/html.
41. I-Centrix. 2002. ‘Voter Information System Integrated Online Network.’ I-Centrix http://www.i-centrix.com/vision.html.
42. Janger, E.J., and P.M. Schwartz. 2002. ‘The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Information Privacy, and the Limits of Default Rules.’ Minnesota Law Review 86:1219-61.
43. Kreimer, S.F. 2001. ‘Technologies of Protest: Insurgent Social Movements and the First Amendment in the Era of the Internet.’ University of Pennsylvania Law Review 150:119-71.
44. Lawson, N.J. 2002. ‘The Emperor’s New Clothes: Data mining, the Real Key to the Kingdom.’ Assessment Journal (May/June): 49.
45. Leahy, P., R. Feingold, and M. Cantwell. 2003. Letter to Attorney General John Ashcroft. 10 Jan. U.S. Senate, Committee on the Judiciary.
46. Leyshon, A., and N. Thrift. 1999. ‘Lists Come Alive: Electronic Systems of Knowledge and the Rise of Credit Scoring in Retail Banking.’ Economy and Society 28: 434-66.
47. Loury, G.C. 2002. The Anatomy of Racial Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Lyon, D. 2003. ‘Surveillance as Social Sorting: Computer Codes and Mobile Bodies.’ In D. Lyon, ed., Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination, 13-30. New York: Routledge.
49. Mack, G. 2002. Total Information Awareness Program (TIA) System Description Document (SDD), 1-150. Washington, DC: Defense Advanced Projects Research Agency
50. Mani, I., L. Van Guilder, C. Clifton, and K. Concepcion. 2000. ‘Text Mining by Filter Composition.’ The Edge 4:1-4.
51. Markle Foundation, Task Force on National Security in the Information Age. 2002. Protecting America’s Freedom in the Information Age. New York: Markle Foundation.
52. McCarthy, J. 2000. ‘Phenomenal Data mining.’ Communications of the ACM 43: 75
53. Mittelstadt, M. 2002. –Orwellian— Data-mining Program Draws Fire from All Sides.’ Dallas Morning News, 16 Dec. (accessed online, Lexis/Nexis, 13 Feb. 2003).
54. Montana, J. 2001. ‘Data mining: A Slippery Slope.’ Information Management Journal 35:50.
55. Moscoso, E., and G. Edmonson. 2003. ‘Pentagon –Data mining— Program Fans PrivacyFears.’ Cox News Service. 18 Jan. (accessed online, Lexis/Nexis, 13 Feb. 2003).
56. Nier, C.L. 1999. ‘Perpetuation of Segregation: Toward a New Historical and Legal Interpretation of Redlining under the Fair Housing Act.’ John Marshall Law Review 32:617-65.
57. Norusis, M.J. 1994. SPSS Advanced Statistics 6.1. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
58. Olsen, S., and M. Kane. 2003. ‘Google Triggers Privacy Concerns.’ CNET News.com. 3 Mar. ttp:znet.com2100-1104-990724.html.
59. Phillips, D., and M. Curry. 2003. ‘Privacy and the Phenetic Urge: Geodemographics and the Changing Spatiality of Local Practice.’ In D. Lyon, ed., Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination, 137-52. New York: Routledge Pollack, M. 2001. ‘Opt-in Government: Using the Internet to Empower Choice.’ Catholic University Law Review 50:653-702.
60. Predictive Networks, Inc. 2001. ‘Digital Silhouettes.’ http:www.predicti venetworks.com
61. Pressman, A. 2000. ‘Voters for Sale.’ The Industry Standard, http://wwwthestandard.com/article/0,1902,19864,00.html
62. Roberts-Witt, S.L. 2001. ‘Gold Diggers.’ PC Magazine.
63. http://www.pcmag.com/print_article/0,3048a%253D5356,00.asp Rothleder, N. 2000. ‘Data mining for IntrusionDetection.’ The Edge 4:10-11.
64. Sigelman, L., and S.A. Tuch. 1997. ‘Metastereotypes: Blacks’ Perceptions of Whites’ Stereotypes of Blacks.’ Public Opinion Quarterly 61:87-101.
65. Skok, G. 2000. ‘Establishing a Legitimate Expectation of Privacy in Clickstream Data.’ Michigan Telecommunication and Technology Law Review 6:61-88.
66. Smith, B.C. 1998. On the Origin of Objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67. Solove, D.J. 2001. ‘Privacy and Power: Computer Databases and Metaphors for Information Privacy.’ Stanford Law Review 43:1393-1462.
68. Sovern, J. 1999. ‘Opting In, Opting Out, or No Options at All: The Fight for Control of Personal Information.’ Washington Law Review 74:1033-1118.
69. Stepanek, M. 2000. ‘Weblining.’ Business Week E.Biz. 3 Apr.: EB26-33.
70. Stevens, L. 2001. ‘It Sharpens Data mining’s Focus-Instead of Building Data mining Applications with No Clear Goal, Companies Are Setting Priorities Up Front to Maximize ROI.’ Internet Week (6 Aug.): 29.
71. U.S. Patriot Act. 2001. Public Law No. 107-56,115 Stat. 272.
72. Webster, J.G., P.F. Phalen, and L.W. Lichty. 2000. Ratings Analysis: The Theory and Practice of Audience Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
73. Wylie, M. 2003. ‘Homeland Security; With Marketers, Not Much Remains Private; Companies Own Data That Government Wants to Identify Terrorists.’ San Diego Union-Tribune (5 Jan.): Al.
74. Zarsky, T.Z. 2002/3. –Mine Your Own Business!—: Making the Case for the Implications of the Data Mining of Personal Information in the Forum of Public Opinion.’ Yale Journal of Law & Technology 5:1-55.