Self-acquired patient images: The promises and the pitfalls

Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 13-17

  Damanpour, Shadi ^a   Srivastava, Divya ^b   Nijhawan, Rajiv I ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFIDENTIALITY; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; SKIN SURGERY; SMARTPHONE; STANDARDIZATION; TELEDERMATOLOGY; DERMATOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; TELEMEDICINE;

CONFIDENTIALITY; DERMATOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84966356800     PISSN: 10855629     EISSN: 15580768     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12788/j.sder.2016.013     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Gerber BS, Stolley MR, Thompson AL, Sharp LK, Fitzgibbon ML. Mobile phone text messaging to promote healthy behaviors and weight loss maintenance: a feasibility study. Health Informatics J. 2009;15(1):17-25.
2. Fjeldsoe BS, Marshall AL, Miller YD. Behavior change interventions delivered by mobile telephone short-message service. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(2):165-173.
3. Hsieh C, Yun D, Bhatia AC, Hsu JT, Ruiz de Luzuriaga AM. Patient perception on the usage of smartphones for medical photography and for reference in dermatology. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41(1):149-154.
4. Wolf JA, Moreau JF, Patton TJ, Winger DG, Ferris LK. Prevalence and impact of health-related internet and smartphone use among dermatology patients. Cutis. 2015;95(6):323-328.
5. Brady MS, Oliveria SA, Christos PJ, et al. Patterns of detection in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Cancer. 2000;89(2):342-347.
6. Epstein DS, Lange JR, Gruber SB, Mofid M, Koch SE. Is physician detection associated with thinner melanomas? JAMA. 1999;281(7):640-643.
7. Eedy DJ, Wootton R. Teledermatology: a review. Br J Dermatol. 2001;144(4):696-707.
8. May C, Giles L, Gupta G. Prospective observational comparative study assessing the role of store and forward teledermatology triage in skin cancer. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2008;33(6):736-739.
9. Moreno-Ramirez D, Ferrandiz L, Nieto-Garcia A, et al. Store-and-forward teledermatology in skin cancer triage: experience and evaluation of 2009 teleconsultations. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(4):479-484.
10. Whited JD, Hall RP, Foy ME, et al. Patient and clinician satisfaction with a storeand-forward teledermatology consult system. Telemed J E Health. 2004;10(4):422-431.
11. Whited JD, Warshaw EM, Edison KE, et al. Effect of store and forward teledermatology on quality of life: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(5):584-591.
12. Moreno-Ramirez D, Ferrandiz L, Ruiz-de-Casas A, et al. Economic evaluation of a store-and-forward teledermatology system for skin cancer patients. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15(1):40-45.
13. Whited JD. Teledermatology research review. Int J Dermatol. 2006;45(3):220-229.
14. Lowitt MH, Kessler, II, Kauffman CL, Hooper FJ, Siegel E, Burnett JW. Teledermatology and in-person examinations: a comparison of patient and physician perceptions and diagnostic agreement. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134(4):471-476.
15. Mahendran R, Goodfield MJ, Sheehan-Dare RA. An evaluation of the role of a store-and-forward teledermatology system in skin cancer diagnosis and management. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2005;30(3):209-214.
16. Kroemer S, Frühauf J, Campbell TM, et al. Mobile teledermatology for skin tumour screening: diagnostic accuracy of clinical and dermoscopic image tele-evaluation using cellular phones. Br J Dermatol. 2011;164(5):973-979.
17. Coates SJ, Kvedar J, Granstein RD. Teledermatology: from historical perspective to emerging techniques of the modern era: part I: history, rationale, and current practice. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(4):563-574; quiz 575-566.
18. Anyanwu CO, Lipoff JB. Smartphones, photography, and security in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(1):193-195.
19. Frühauf J, Schwantzer G, Ambros-Rudolph CM, et al. Pilot study on the acceptance of mobile teledermatology for the home monitoring of high-need patients with psoriasis. Australas J Dermatol. 2012;53(1):41-46.
20. Frühauf J, Kröck S, Quehenberger F, et al. Mobile teledermatology helping patients control high-need acne: a randomized controlled trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(5):919-924.
21. American Academy of Dermatology and AAD Association. Position Statement on Teledermatology. (Approved by the Board of Directors February 22, 2002; Amended by the Board of Directors May 22, 2004; November 9, 2013; August 9, 2014; May 16, 2015. https://www.aad.org/forms/policies/Uploads/PS/PS-Teledermatology.pdf. Accessed January 27, 2016.
22. Marchetti MA, Fonseca M, Dusza SW, et al. Dermatoscopic imaging of skin lesions by high school students: a cross-sectional pilot study. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2015;5(1):11-28.
23. Wu X, Oliveria SA, Yagerman S, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of patient-initiated mobile teledermoscopy for short-term monitoring of clinically atypical nevi. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(5):489-496.
24. Janda M, Loescher LJ, Soyer HP. Enhanced skin self-examination: a novel approach to skin cancer monitoring and follow-up. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(2):231-236.
25. Manahan MN, Soyer HP, Loescher LJ, et al. A pilot trial of mobile, patient-performed teledermoscopy. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(4):1072-1080.
26. Ke M, Moul D, Camouse M, et al. Where is it? The utility of biopsy-site photography. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(2):198-202.
27. McGinness JL, Goldstein G. The value of preoperative biopsy-site photography for identifying cutaneous lesions. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(2):194-197.
28. Nijhawan RI, Lee EH, Nehal KS. Biopsy site selfies-a quality improvement pilot study to assist with correct surgical site identification. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41(4):499-504.
29. Lichtman MK, Countryman NB. Cell phone-assisted identification of surgery site. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(3 Pt 1):491-492.
30. Bhatia AC. It's right there in your hand: underuse of mobile applications in dermatology. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(11):1305.
31. Brewer AC, Endly DC, Henley J, et al. Mobile applications in dermatology. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(11):1300-1304.
32. March J, Hand M, Grossman D. Practical application of new technologies for melanoma diagnosis: Part I. Noninvasive approaches. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(6):929-941.
33. Robson Y, Blackford S, Roberts D. Caution in melanoma risk analysis with smart phone application technology. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167(3):703-704.
34. Maier T, Kulichova D, Schotten K, et al. Accuracy of a smartphone application using fractal image analysis of pigmented moles compared to clinical diagnosis and histological result. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(4):663-667.
35. Ferrero NA, Morrell DS, Burkhart CN. Skin scan: a demonstration of the need for FDA regulation of medical apps on iPhone. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68(3):515-516.
36. Wolf JA, Ferris LK. Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection-reply. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(7):885.
37. Deveau M, Chilukuri S. Mobile applications for dermatology. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2012;31(3):174-182.
38. Hamilton AD, Brady RR. Medical professional involvement in smartphone 'apps' in dermatology. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167(1):220-221.
39. US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration; Center for Devices and Radiological Health; Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Mobile Medical Applications. Guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. February 9, 2015. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/./UCM263366.pdf. Accessed January 27, 2016.
40. Janda M, Loescher LJ, Banan P, Horsham C, Soyer HP. Lesion selection by melanoma high-risk consumers during skin self-examination using mobile teledermoscopy. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(6):656-658.
41. Lakdawala N, Fontanella D, Grant-Kels JM. Ethical considerations in dermatologic photography. Clin Dermatol. 2012;30(5):486-491.
42. Leger MC, Wu T, Haimovic A, et al. Patient perspectives on medical photography in dermatology. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(9):1028-1037.
43. Godic A, Haque-Hussain S, Burrows NP. Neonatal lupus erythematosus: the use of telephone images in diagnosis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2014;39(7):852-853.
44. Quigley EA, Tokay BA, Jewell ST, Marchetti MA, Halpern AC. Technology and technique standards for camera-acquired digital dermatologic images: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(8):883-890.
45. Coates SJ, Kvedar J, Granstein RD. Teledermatology: from historical perspective to emerging techniques of the modern era: part II: emerging technologies in teledermatology, limitations and future directions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(4):577-586; quiz 587-588.
46. Kunde L, McMeniman E, Parker M. Clinical photography in dermatology: ethical and medico-legal considerations in the age of digital and smartphone technology. Australas J Dermatol. 2013;54(3):192-197.