An evaluation of the role of a store-and-forward teledermatology system in skin cancer diagnosis and management

Clinical and Experimental Dermatology

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 209-214

  Mahendran, R ^a   Goodfield, M J D ^a   Sheehan Dare, R A ^a  

^a LEEDS GENERAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFETY; SKIN CANCER; TECHNOLOGY; TELECOMMUNICATION; TREATMENT PLANNING; UNITED KINGDOM;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DERMATOLOGY; ENGLAND; FAMILY PRACTICE; HUMANS; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SKIN NEOPLASMS; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 17444378230     PISSN: 03076938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2005.01735.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. National Health Service Executive. Information for health: an information strategy for the modern NHS 1998-2001. London: National Health Service 1998 Executive, 2001.
2. Lyon CC, Harrison PV. Diagnostic imaging and Teledermatology, educational and diagnostic applications of a portable digital imaging system for the trainee dermatologist. Clin Exp Dermatol 1997; 22: 163-5.
3. Zelickson BD, Homan L. Teledermatology in the nursing home. Arch Dermatol 1997; 133: 171-4.
4. Kvedar JC, Edwards RA, Menn ER et al. The substitution of digital images for dermatologic physical examination. Arch Dermatol 1997; 133: 161-7.
5. High WA, Houston MS, Calobrisi SD et al. Assessment of the accuracy of low-cost store-and-forward teledermatology consultation. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 42: 776-83.
6. Harrison PV, Kirby B, Dickinson Y, Schofield R. Teledermatology - high technology or not? J Telemed Telecare 1998; 4: 31-2.
7. Whited JD, Hall RP, Simel DL et al. Reliability and accuracy of dermatologists' clinic-based and digital image consultations. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 41: 693-702.
8. Loane MA, Bloomer SE, Corbett R et al. A comparison of real-time and store-and-forward Teledermatology: a cost-benefit study. Br J Dermatol 2000; 143: 1241-7.
9. Department of Health. The National Health Service Cancer Plan. London: Department of Health, 2000.
10. Taylor P, Goldsmith P, Murray K et al. Evaluating a telemedicine system to assist in the management of dermatology referrals. Br J Dermatol 2001; 144: 328-33.
11. May CR, Mort M, Mair FS et al. Evaluation of new technologies in health care systems: what's the context? Health Inf J 2000; 6: 67-70.
12. Mair FS, Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. Br Med J 2000; 320: 1517-20.
13. Williams TL, May CR, Esmail A et al. Patient satisfaction with Teledermatology is related to perceived quality of life. Br J Dermatol 2001; 145: 911-7.
14. Weinstock MA, Nguyen FQ, Risica PM. Patient and referring provider satisfaction with teledermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 47: 68-72.
15. Whitten PS, Mair FS, Haycox A et al. Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions. Br Med J 2002; 324: 1434-7.