Pilot study on the acceptance of mobile teledermatology for the home monitoring of high-need patients with psoriasis

Australasian Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 41-46

  Frühauf, Julia ^a   Schwantzer, Gerold ^a   Ambros Rudolph, Christina M ^a   Weger, Wolfgang ^a   Ahlgrimm Siess, Verena ^a   Salmhofer, Wolfgang ^a   Hofmann Wellenhof, Rainer ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

acceptance; home monitoring; mobile phones; psoriasis; quality of life; teledermatology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH SERVICE; HOME MONITORING; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MOBILE PHONE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHYSICIAN; PILOT STUDY; PSORIASIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; TELECONSULTATION; TELEDERMATOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CELLULAR PHONE; DERMATOLOGY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PILOT PROJECTS; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PSORIASIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84856970494     PISSN: 00048380     EISSN: 14400960     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2011.00852.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Lamb CA, Fried RG, Feldman SR,. Giving patients 'perceived control' over psoriasis: advice for optimizing the physician-patient relationship. J. Dermatolog. Treat. 2004; 15: 182-84. (Pubitemid 39214580)
2. Harris DR,. The art of treating psoriasis: practical suggestions for improved treatment. Cutis 1999; 64: 335-36.
3. Van de Kerkhof PC, de Hoop D, de Korte J, et al,. Patient compliance and disease management in the treatment of psoriasis in The Netherlands. Dermatology 2000; 200: 292-98. (Pubitemid 30451575)
4. DiMatteo RM,. Enhancing patient adherence to medical recommendations. JAMA 1994; 271: 79 -83.
5. Von Korff M, Gruman J, Schaefer J, et al,. Collaborative management of chronic illness. Ann. Intern. Med. 1997; 127: 1097-102. (Pubitemid 28012080)
6. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Rossi JS, et al,. Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviours. Health Psychol. 1994; 13: 39-46.
7. Seeman M, Seeman TE,. Health behavior and personal autonomy: a longitudinal study of the sense of control in illness. J. Health Soc. Behav. 1983; 24: 144-60. (Pubitemid 13047489)
8. Brody DS,. The patient's role in clinical decision-making. Ann. Intern. Med. 1980; 93: 718-22. (Pubitemid 10030296)
9. Finch TL, Mort M, Mair FS, et al,. Future patients? Telehealthcare, roles and responsibilities. Health Soc. Care Community 2008; 16: 86-95.
10. Frühauf J, Schwantzer G, Ambros-Rudolph CM, et al,. Pilot study using teledermatology to manage high-need patients with psoriasis. Arch. Dermatol. 2010; 146: 200-1.
11. Nast A, Kopp IB, Augustin M, et al,. Evidence-based (S3) guidelines for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2007; 5 (Suppl 3): 1-119. (Pubitemid 47033875)
12. Eminovic N, Witkamp L, de Keizer NF, et al,. Patient perceptions about a novel form of patient-assisted teledermatology. Arch. Dermatol. 2006; 142: 648-9. (Pubitemid 43727562)
13. Finlay AY, Khan GK,. Dermatology life quality index (DLQI)-a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 1994; 19: 210-16. (Pubitemid 24194579)
14. Lewis V, Finlay AY,. 10 years experience of the dermatology life quality index (DLQI). J. Invest. Dermatol. Symp. Proc. 2004; 9: 169-80. (Pubitemid 38457276)
15. Hongbo Y, Thomas CL, Harrison MA, et al,. Translating the science of quality of life into practice: what do dermatology life quality index scores mean? J. Invest. Dermatol. 2005; 125: 659-64.
16. Demiris G, Speedie SM, Hicks LL,. Assessment of patients' acceptance of and satisfaction with teledermatology. J. Med. Syst. 2004; 28: 575-9. (Pubitemid 39388726)
17. Whited JD,. Teledermatology research review. Int. J. Dermatol. 2006; 45: 220-9. (Pubitemid 43337633)
18. Weinstock MA, Nguyen FQ, Risica PM,. Patient and referring provider satisfaction with teledermatology. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2002; 47: 68-72.
19. Kvedar JC, Menn ER, Baradagunta S, et al,. Teledermatology in a capitated delivery system using distributed information architecture: design and development. Telemed. J. 1999; 5: 357-66. (Pubitemid 30127216)
20. Van den Akker TW, Reker CH, Knol A, et al,. Teledermatology as a tool for communication between general practitioners and dermatologists. J. Telemed. Telecare 2001; 7: 193-8. (Pubitemid 33639539)
21. Shikiar R, Bresnahan BW, Stone SP, et al,. Validity and reliability of patient reported outcomes used in psoriasis: results from two randomized clinical trials. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2003; 1: 53.
22. Williams TL, Esmail A, May CR, et al,. Patient satisfaction with teledermatology is related to perceived quality of life. Br. J. Dermatol. 2001; 145: 911-17. (Pubitemid 34204465)
23. Williams T, May C, Esmail A, et al,. Patient satisfaction with store-and-forward teledermatology. J. Telemed. Telecare 2001; 7 (Suppl. 1): 45-6. (Pubitemid 33702735)
24. Oakley AM, Duffill MB, Reeve P,. Practising dermatology via telemedicine. N. Z. Med. J. 1998; 111: 296-9. (Pubitemid 128473023)
25. Hayn D, Koller S, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, et al,. Mobile phone-based teledermatologic compliance management-preliminary results of the TELECOMP study. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2009; 150: 468-72.