The synaptonemal complex is assembled by a polySUMOylation-driven feedback mechanism in yeast

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 211, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 785-793

  Leung, Wing Kit ^a   Humphryes, Neil ^a,c   Afshar, Negar ^a   Argunhan, Bilge ^a   Terentyev, Yaroslav ^a   Tsubouchi, Tomomi ^b   Tsubouchi, Hideo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR BASIC BIOLOGY   (Japan)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECM11 PROTEIN; FUNGAL PROTEIN; GMC2 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZIP1 PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; PROTEINASE;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL MIGRATION; CHROMOSOMAL LOCALIZATION; CONJUGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FUNGAL STRAIN; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; MEIOSIS; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; POLYMERIZATION; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN DEPLETION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN INDUCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SUMOYLATION; SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX; BUDDING YEAST; METABOLISM; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; ENDOPEPTIDASES; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; FUNGAL PROTEINS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; SACCHAROMYCETALES; SUMOYLATION; SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX;

EID: 84966277301     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201506103     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Agarwal, S., and G.S. Roeder. 2000. Zip3 provides a link between recombination enzymes and synaptonemal complex proteins. Cell. 102:245-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00029-5
2. Bergerat, A., B. de Massy, D. Gadelle, P.C. Varoutas, A. Nicolas, and P. Forterre. 1997. An atypical topoisomerase II from Archaea with implications for meiotic recombination. Nature. 386:414-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/386414a0
3. Blitzblau, H.G., and A. Hochwagen. 2011. Genome-wide detection of meiotic DNA double-strand break hotspots using single-stranded DNA. Methods Mol. Biol. 745:47-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-129-1_4
4. Brar, G.A., M. Yassour, N. Friedman, A. Regev, N.T. Ingolia, and J.S. Weissman. 2012. High-resolution view of the yeast meiotic program revealed by ribosome profiling. Science. 335:552-557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1215110
5. Cheng, C.H., Y.H. Lo, S.S. Liang, S.C. Ti, F.M. Lin, C.H. Yeh, H.Y. Huang, and T.F. Wang. 2006. SUMO modifications control assembly of synaptonemal complex and polycomplex in meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 20:2067-2081. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1430406
6. Chua, P.R., and G.S. Roeder. 1998. Zip2, a meiosis-specific protein required for the initiation of chromosome synapsis. Cell. 93:349-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81164-2
7. de Carvalho, C.E., and M.P. Colaiácovo. 2006. SUMO-mediated regulation of synaptonemal complex formation during meiosis. Genes Dev. 20:1986-1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1457806
8. Diaz, R.L., A.D. Alcid, J.M. Berger, and S. Keeney. 2002. Identification of residues in yeast Spo11p critical for meiotic DNA double-strand break formation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:1106-1115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.4.1106-1115.2002
9. Dong, H., and G.S. Roeder. 2000. Organization of the yeast Zip1 protein within the central region of the synaptonemal complex. J. Cell Biol. 148:417-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.148.3.417
10. Dresser, M.E., and C.N. Giroux. 1988. Meiotic chromosome behavior in spread preparations of yeast. J. Cell Biol. 106:567-573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.106.3.567
11. Eichinger, C.S., and S. Jentsch. 2010. Synaptonemal complex formation and meiotic checkpoint signaling are linked to the lateral element protein Red1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107:11370-11375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004248107
12. Hooker, G.W., and G.S. Roeder. 2006. A role for SUMO in meiotic chromosome synapsis. Curr. Biol. 16:1238-1243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.04.045
13. Humphryes, N., W.K. Leung, B. Argunhan, Y. Terentyev, M. Dvorackova, and H. Tsubouchi. 2013. The Ecm11-Gmc2 complex promotes synaptonemal complex formation through assembly of transverse filaments in budding yeast. PLoS Genet. 9:e1003194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003194
14. Johnson, E.S., and A.A. Gupta. 2001. An E3-like factor that promotes SUMO conjugation to the yeast septins. Cell. 106:735-744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00491-3
15. Klug, H., M. Xaver, V.K. Chaugule, S. Koidl, G. Mittler, F. Klein, and A. Pichler. 2013. Ubc9 sumoylation controls SUMO chain formation and meiotic synapsis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. 50:625-636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.03.027
16. Lake, C.M., and R.S. Hawley. 2012. The molecular control of meiotic chromosomal behavior: events in early meiotic prophase in Drosophila oocytes. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 74:425-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-020911-153342
17. Lee, B.H., and A. Amon. 2003. Role of Polo-like kinase CDC5 in programming meiosis I chromosome segregation. Science. 300:482-486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1081846
18. Li, S.J., and M. Hochstrasser. 1999. A new protease required for cell-cycle progression in yeast. Nature. 398:246-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/18457
19. Li, S.J., and M. Hochstrasser. 2000. The yeast ULP2 (SMT4) gene encodes a novel protease specific for the ubiquitin-like Smt3 protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:2367-2377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.20.7.2367-2377.2000
20. Lin, F.M., Y.J. Lai, H.J. Shen, Y.H. Cheng, and T.F. Wang. 2010. Yeast axial-element protein, Red1, binds SUMO chains to promote meiotic interhomologue recombination and chromosome synapsis. EMBO J. 29:586-596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.362
21. Longtine, M.S., A. McKenzie III, D.J. Demarini, N.G. Shah, A. Wach, A. Brachat, P. Philippsen, and J.R. Pringle. 1998. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 14:953-961. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199807)14:10<953::AID-YEA293>3.0.CO;2-U
22. Lupas, A., M. Van Dyke, and J. Stock. 1991. Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science. 252:1162-1164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.252.5009.1162
23. Macqueen, A.J., and G.S. Roeder. 2009. Fpr3 and Zip3 ensure that initiation of meiotic recombination precedes chromosome synapsis in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 19:1519-1526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.048
24. Perry, J., N. Kleckner, and G.V. Börner. 2005. Bioinformatic analyses implicate the collaborating meiotic crossover/chiasma proteins Zip2, Zip3, and Spo22/Zip4 in ubiquitin labeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:17594-17599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0508581102
25. Roeder, G.S. 1997. Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango. Genes Dev. 11:2600-2621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.11.20.2600
26. Schwienhorst, I., E.S. Johnson, and R.J. Dohmen. 2000. SUMO conjugation and deconjugation. Mol. Gen. Genet. 263:771-786. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004380000254
27. Shinohara, M., S.D. Oh, N. Hunter, and A. Shinohara. 2008. Crossover assurance and crossover interference are distinctly regulated by the ZMM proteins during yeast meiosis. Nat. Genet. 40:299-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.83
28. Smith, A.V., and G.S. Roeder. 1997. The yeast Red1 protein localizes to the cores of meiotic chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 136:957-967. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.136.5.957
29. Stead, K., C. Aguilar, T. Hartman, M. Drexel, P. Meluh, and V. Guacci. 2003. Pds5p regulates the maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion and is sumoylated to promote the dissolution of cohesion. J. Cell Biol. 163:729-741. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200305080
30. Sym, M., and G.S. Roeder. 1994. Crossover interference is abolished in the absence of a synaptonemal complex protein. Cell. 79:283-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(94)90197-X
31. Sym, M., J.A. Engebrecht, and G.S. Roeder. 1993. Zip1 is a synaptonemal complex protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell. 72:365-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(93)90114-6
32. Takahashi, Y., T. Kahyo, A. Toh-E, H. Yasuda, and Y. Kikuchi. 2001. Yeast Ull1/Siz1 is a novel SUMO1/Smt3 ligase for septin components and functions as an adaptor between conjugating enzyme and substrates. J. Biol. Chem. 276:48973-48977. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109295200
33. Takahashi, Y., V. Yong-Gonzalez, Y. Kikuchi, and A. Strunnikov. 2006. SIZ1/SIZ2 control of chromosome transmission fidelity is mediated by the sumoylation of topoisomerase II. Genetics. 172:783-794. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.047167
34. Tsubouchi, T., H. Zhao, and G.S. Roeder. 2006. The meiosis-specific Zip4 protein regulates crossover distribution by promoting synaptonemal complex formation together with Zip2. Dev. Cell. 10:809-819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2006.04.003
35. Tung, K.S., and G.S. Roeder. 1998. Meiotic chromosome morphology and behavior in zip1 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 149:817-832
36. Voelkel-Meiman, K., L.F. Taylor, P. Mukherjee, N. Humphryes, H. Tsubouchi, and A.J. MacQueen. 2013. SUMO localizes to the central element of synaptonemal complex and is required for the full synapsis of meiotic chromosomes in budding yeast. PLoS Genet. 9:e1003837. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003837
37. Xu, L., M. Ajimura, R. Padmore, C. Klein, and N. Kleckner. 1995. NDT80, a meiosis-specific gene required for exit from pachytene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:6572-6581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.15.12.6572
38. Zavec, A.B., A. Comino, M. Lenassi, and R. Komel. 2008. Ecm11 protein of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is regulated by sumoylation during meiosis. FEMS Yeast Res. 8:64-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00307.x
39. Zickler, D., and N. Kleckner. 1999. Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. Annu. Rev. Genet. 33:603-754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.33.1.603