The efficacy of a commercial competitive exclusion product on Campylobacter colonization in broiler chickens in a 5-week pilot-scale study

Poultry Science

Volumn 95, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 1125-1128

  Schneitz, C ^a   Hakkinen, M ^b  

^a ORION CORPORATION   (Finland)

^b NATL VET AND FOOD RES INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

broiler; campylobacter; competitive exclusion

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANTIBIOSIS; BACTERIAL PHENOMENA AND FUNCTIONS; CAMPYLOBACTER; CAMPYLOBACTER INFECTIONS; CECUM; CHICKEN; HETEROZYGOTE; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MICROBIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; POULTRY DISEASES; VETERINARY;

ANIMALS; ANTIBIOSIS; BACTERIAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; CAMPYLOBACTER; CAMPYLOBACTER INFECTIONS; CARRIER STATE; CECUM; CHICKENS; PILOT PROJECTS; POULTRY DISEASES;

EID: 84965150054     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: 15253171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3382/ps/pew020     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Aho, M., and J. Hirn. 1988. Prevalence of campylobacteria in the Finnish broiler chicken chain from the producer to the consumer. Acta Vet. Scand. 29:451-462.
2. Aho, M., L. Nuotio, E. Nurmi, and T. Kiiskinen. 1992. Competitive exclusion of campylobacters from poultry with K-bacteria and Broilact R . Int. J. Food Microbiol. 15: 265-275.
3. Bolder, N. M. P. F. G., F. F. Putirulan Vereijken, and R. W. A. W. Mulder. 1995. The effect of competitive exclusion on the Salmonella contamination of broilers (a field study). Pages. 89-97 In Proceedings of the 2nd annual meeting of EC COST Working Group No. 2, R. C. Briz, ed. Zaragoza, Spain: Graficas Imprinter.
4. Buckley, A. M., J. Wang, D. L. Hudson, A. J. Grant, M. A. Jones, D. J. Maskell, and M. P. Stevens. 2010. Evaluation of live-attenuated Salmonella vaccines expressing Campylobacter antigens for control of C. jejuni in poultry. Vaccine. 28:1094-1105.
5. EFSA. 2010. Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of Campylobacter in broiler batches and of Campylobacter and Salmonella on broiler carcasses in the EU, 2008, Part A: Campylobacter and Salmonella prevalence estimates. EFSA Journal 2010; 8:1503). [100 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1503. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu.
6. EFSA. 2011. Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ); Scientific Opinion on Campylobacter in broiler meat production: control options and performance objectives and/or targets at different stages of the food chain. EFSA Journal 2011; 9:2105. [141 pp.].
7. Ghareeb, K.,W. A. Awad, M. Mohnl, R. Porta, M. Biarnés, J. Böhm, and G. Schatzmayr. 2012. Evaluating the efficacy of an avianspecific probiotic to reduce the colonization of Campylobacter jejuni in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 91:1825-1832.
8. Hakkinen, M., and C. Schneitz. 1999. Efficacy of a commercial competitive exclusion product against Campylobacter jejuni. Br. Poult. Sci. 40:619-621.
9. Hirn, J., E. Nurmi, T. Johansson, and L. Nuotio. 1992. Long-term experience with competitive exclusion and salmonellas in Finland. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 15:237-240.
10. Jansen, W. I., F. Reich, and G. Klein. 2014. Large-scale feasibility of organic acids as a permanent preharvest intervention in drinking water of broilers and their effect on foodborne Campylobacter spp. before processing. J. Appl. Microbiol. 116:1676-1687.
11. Kittler, S. I., S. Fischer, A. Abdulmawjood, G. Glünder, and G. Klein. 2013. Effect of bacteriophage application on Campylobacter jejuni loads in commercial broiler flocks. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79:7525-7533.
12. MacRitchie, L. A., C. J. Hunter, and N. Strachan. 2014. Consumer acceptability of interventions to reduce Campylobacter in the poultry food chain. Food Control. 35:260-266.
13. Mead, G. C., P. A. Barrow, M. H. Hinton, F. Humbert, C. S. Impey, C. Lahellec, R. W. A. W. Mulder, S. Stavric, and N. J. Stern. 1989. Recommended assay for treatment of chicks to prevent Salmonella colonization by 'competitive exclusion'. J. Food Prot. 52:500-502.
14. Mead, G. C., M. J. Scott, T. J. Humphrey, and K. McAlpine. 1996. Observations on the control of Campylobacter jejuni infection of poultry by competitive exclusion. Avian Path. 25:69-70.
15. Schneitz, C. 1992. Automated droplet application of a competitive exclusion preparation. Poult. Sci. 71:2125-2128.
16. Schneitz, C., and M. Hakkinen. 1998. Comparison of two different types of competitive exclusion products. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 26:338-341.
17. Schoeni, J. L., and A. C. L Wong. 1994. Inhibition of Campylobacter jejuni colonization in chicks by defined competitive exclusion bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60:1191-1197.
18. Stern, N. J., N. A. Cox, J. S. Bailey, M. E. Berrang, and M. T. Musgrove. 2001. Comparison of mucosal competitive exclusion and competitive exclusion treatment to reduce Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. colonization in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 80:156-160.
19. Svetoch, E. A., and N. J. Stern. 2010. Bacteriocins to control Campylobacter spp. in poultry-A review. Poult. Sci. 89:1763-1768.
20. Zhang, G., and M. P. Doyle. 2007. Potential competitive exclusion bacteria from poultry inhibitory to Campylobacter jejuni and Salmonella. J. Food Prot. 70:867-873.