Ideology and health professional education scholarship

Advances in Health Sciences Education

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 501-503

  Ellaway, Rachel H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; RESEARCH; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDS; VOCATIONAL EDUCATION;

EDUCATION, PROFESSIONAL; FELLOWSHIPS AND SCHOLARSHIPS; HUMANS; RESEARCH; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 84965066418     PISSN: 13824996     EISSN: 15731677     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10459-016-9684-7     Document Type: Editorial

References (9)

1. Ellaway, R. H. (2016). Moral agency and the medical education researcher. Medical Education. doi:10.1111/medu.12924.
2. Glassick, C. E. (2000). Boyer’s expanded definitions of scholarship, the standards for assessing scholarship, and the elusiveness of the scholarship of teaching. Academic Medicine, 75(9), 877–880.
3. Lingard, L. (2007). The rhetorical ‘turn’ in medical education: What have we learned and where are we going? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12(2), 121–133.
4. Lingard, L. (2009). What we see and don’t see when we look at ‘competence’: Notes on a god term. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(5), 625–628.
5. Lyotard, J. F. (1979). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
6. Meighan, R., & Harber, C. (2007). A sociology of educating. London, UK: Continuum.
7. Regehr, G. (2010). It’s NOT rocket science: Rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Medical Education, 44(1), 31–39.
8. Sokal, A. D. (1994). Transgressing the boundaries: Towards a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity. Social Text, 46(47), 217–252.
9. Žižek, S. (2008). The sublime object of ideology. London, UK: Verso.