3T MRI investigation of cardiac left ventricular structure and function in a UK population: The tayside screening for the prevention of cardiac events (TASCFORCE) study

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 1186-1196

  Gandy, Stephen J ^a   Lambert, Matthew ^b   Belch, Jill ^b   Cavin, Ian ^a   Crowe, Elena ^a   Littleford, Roberta ^b   MacFarlane, Jennifer A ^a   Matthew, Shona Z ^b   Martin, Patricia ^a   Nicholas, R Stephen ^a   Struthers, Allan ^b   Sullivan, Frank ^c,d   Waugh, Shelley A ^a   White, Richard D ^a,e   Weir McCall, Jonathan R ^b   Houston, J Graeme ^a,b  

^a NINEWELLS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d NORTH YORK GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF WALES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3.0T; cardiac; left ventricle; MRI; population

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDSYSTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE VALUE; SEX DIFFERENCE; UNITED KINGDOM; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGING; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEART VENTRICLE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SEX FACTOR; SEX RATIO; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; FEMALE; HEART VENTRICLES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE VALUES; SEX DISTRIBUTION; SEX FACTORS; STROKE VOLUME; UNITED KINGDOM; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 84964951696     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25267     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alfakih K, Plein S, Thiele H, Jones T, Ridgway JP, Sivananthan MU. Normal human left and right ventricular dimensions for MRI as assessed by turbo gradient echo and steady-state free precession imaging sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI 2003;17:323–329.
2. Hudsmith LE, Petersen SE, Francis JM, Robson MD, Neubauer S. Normal human left and right ventricular and left atrial dimensions using steady state free precession magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2005;7:775–782.
3. Maciera AM, Prasad SK, Khan M, Pennell DJ. Normalized Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006;8:417–426.
4. Yeon SB, Salton CJ, Gona P, et al. Impact of age, sex, and indexation method on MR left ventricular reference values in the Framingham Heart Study offspring cohort. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41:1038–1045.
5. Chung AK, Das SR, Leonard D, et al. Women have higher left ventricular ejection fractions than men independent of differences in left ventricular volume: the Dallas Heart Study. Circulation 2006;113:1597–1604.
6. Natori S, Lai S, Finn JP, et al. Cardiovascular function in multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: normal values by age, sex, and ethnicity. Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:S357–S365.
7. Schelbert EB, Cao JJ, Sigurdsson S, et al. Prevalence and prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction determined by cardiac magnetic resonance in older adults. JAMA 2012;308:890–897.
8. Hegenscheid K, Seipel R, Schmidt CO, et al. Potentially relevant incidental findings on research whole-body MRI in the general adult population: frequencies and management. Eur Radiol 2013;23:816–826.
9. Payne R, Eleftheriou KI, James LE, et al. Left ventricular growth response to exercise and cigarette smoking: data from LARGE Heart. Heart 2006;92:1784–1788.
10. Petersen SE, Matthews PM, Bamberg F, et al. Imaging in population science: cardiovascular magnetic resonance in 100,000 participants of UK Biobank — rationale, challenges and approaches. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013;15:46.
11. Kawel-Boehm N, Maceira A, Valsangiacomo-Buechel ER, et al. Normal values for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults and children. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015;17:29.
12. Hudsmith LE, Petersen SE, Tyler DJ, et al. Determination of cardiac volumes and mass with FLASH and SSFP cine sequences at 1.5 vs. 3 Tesla: a validation study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:312–318.
13. Chaustre-Mendoza LF, Marti-Bonmati L, Roldan I, Calvillo P, Sanz-Requena R, Moratal D. Resonancia magnetica del ventrýculo izquierdo en sujetos sanos: valores normales de morfologýa, funcion, perfusion y viabilidad. Radiologia 2009;51:273–281.
14. Liu CY, Bluemke DA, Gerstenblith G, et al. Reference values of myocardial structure, function, and tissue composition by cardiac magnetic resonance in healthy African-Americans at 3T and their relations to serologic and cardiovascular risk factors. Am J Cardiol 2014;114:789–795.
15. Drazner MH, Dries DL, Peshock RM, et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy is more prevalent in blacks than whites in the general population: the Dallas Heart Study. Hypertension 2005;46:124–129.
16. Michaely HJ, Nael K, Schoenberg SO, et al. Analysis of cardiac function — comparison between 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience. Invest Radiol 2006;41:133–140.
17. Tyler DJ, Hudsmith LE, Petersen SE, et al. Cardiac cine MR-imaging at 3T: FLASH vs SSFP. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006;8:709–715.
18. Stanisz GJ, Odrobina EE, Pun J, et al. T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:507–512.
19. Schar M, Kozerke S, Fischer SE, Boesiger P. Cardiac SSFP imaging at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:799–806.
20. Bluemke DA, Kronmal RA, Lima JAC, et al. The relationship of left ventricular mass and geometry to incident cardiovascular events. The MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:2148–2155.
21. Cleeman JL, National Cholesterol Education Programme (NCEP) Expert Panel. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Programme (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001;285:2486–2497.
22. Gandy SJ, Lambert M, Belch JJF, et al. Technical assessment of whole body angiography and cardiac function within a single MRI examination. Clin Radiol 2015;70:595–603.
23. Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J, et al. Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post-processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013;15:35–54.
24. Mosteller RD. Simplified calculation of body-surface area. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1098.
25. de Simone G, Daniels SR, Devereux RB, et al. Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:1251–1260.
26. Kuch B, Hense H-W, Gneiting B, et al. Body composition and prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation 2000;102:405–410.
27. Marcus JT, DeWaal LK, Gotte MJW, van der Geest RJ, Heethaar RM, Van Rossum AC. MRI-derived left ventricular function parameters and mass in healthy young adults: relation with gender and body size. Int J Cardiac Imaging 1999;15:411–419.
28. Cain PA, Ahl R, Hedstrom E, et al. Age and gender specific normal values of left ventricular mass, volume and function for gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging: a cross sectional study. BMC Med Imaging 2009;9:2.
29. DuBois D, DuBois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med 1916;17:863–871.
30. Chuang ML, Gona P, Hautvast GLTF, et al. Correlation of trabeculae and papillary muscles with clinical and cardiac characteristics and impact on CMR measures of LV anatomy and function. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 2012;5:1115–1123.
31. Suinesiaputra A, Bluemke DA, Cowan BR, et al. Quantification of LV function and mass by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: multi-center variability and consensus contours. J Cardiac Magn Reson 2015;17:63–71.