Age and gender specific normal values of left ventricular mass, volume and function for gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging: A cross sectional study

BMC Medical Imaging

Volumn 9, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Cain, Peter A ^a   Ahl, Ragnhild ^a   Hedstrom, Erik ^a   Ugander, Martin ^a   Allansdotter Johnsson, Ase ^b   Friberg, Peter ^b   Arheden, Hakan ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENCE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADULTHOOD; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE VOLUME; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NORMAL VALUE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REFERENCE VALUE; SEX DIFFERENCE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART VENTRICLE; HISTOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX RATIO; STATISTICS; SWEDEN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; HEART VENTRICLES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX DISTRIBUTION; STROKE VOLUME; SWEDEN; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 63549139570     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712342     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2342-9-2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Pennell DJ Sechtem UP Higgins CB Manning WJ Pohost GM Rademakers FE van Rossum AC Shaw LJ Yucel EK: Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2004, 6(4):727-765 10.1081/JCMR-200038581 15646878
2. Hees PS Fleg JL Lakatta EG Shapiro EP Left ventricular remodeling with age in normal men versus women: Novel insights using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging Am J Cardiol 2002, 90(11):1231-1236 10.1016/ S0002-9149(02)02840-0 12450604
3. Lorenz CH Walker ES Morgan VL Klein SS Graham TP Jr Normal human right and left ventricular mass, systolic function, and gender differences by cine magnetic resonance imaging J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 1999, 1(1):7-21 10.3109/10976649909080829 11550343
4. Marcus JT DeWaal LK Gotte MJ Geest van der RJ Heethaar RM Van Rossum AC MRI-derived left ventricular function parameters and mass in healthy young adults: Relation with gender and body size Int J Card Imaging 1999, 15(5):411-419 10.1023/A:1006268405585 10595407
5. Sandstede J Lipke C Beer M Hofmann S Pabst T Kenn W Neubauer S Hahn D Age- and gender-specific differences in left and right ventricular cardiac function and mass determined by cine magnetic resonance imaging Eur Radiol 2000, 10(3):438-442 10.1007/s003300050072 10756992
6. Salton CJ Chuang ML O'Donnell CJ Kupka MJ Larson MG Kissinger KV Edelman RR Levy D Manning WJ Gender differences and normal left ventricular anatomy in an adult population free of hypertension. A cardiovascular magnetic resonance study of the Framingham Heart Study Offspring cohort J Am Coll Cardiol 2002, 39(6):1055-1060 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01712-6 11897450
7. Alfakih K Plein S Thiele H Jones T Ridgway JP Sivananthan MU Normal human left and right ventricular dimensions for MRI as assessed by turbo gradient echo and steady-state free precession imaging sequences J Magn Reson Imaging 2003, 17(3):323-329 10.1002/jmri.10262 12594722
8. Hudsmith LE Petersen SE Francis JM Robson MD Neubauer S Normal human left and right ventricular and left atrial dimensions using steady state free precession magnetic resonance imaging J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2005, 7(5):775-782 10.1080/10976640500295516 16353438
9. Maceira AM Prasad SK Khan M Pennell DJ Normalized left ventricular systolic and diastolic function by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006, 8(3):417-426 10.1080/10976640600572889 16755827
10. 1999 World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. Guidelines Subcommittee J Hypertens 1999, 17(2):151-183 10067786
11. Pennell DJ Ventricular volume and mass by CMR J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2002, 4(4):507-513 10.1081/JCMR-120016389 12549238
12. Shrout P Fleiss JL Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability Psychological Bulletin 1979, 2:420-428 10.1037/ 0033-2909.86.2.420 18839484
13. Mosteller RD Simplified calculation of body-surface area N Engl J Med 1987, 317(17):1098 3657876
14. Cain PA Ahl R Hedstrom E Ugander M Allansdotter-Johnsson A Friberg P Marild S Arheden H Physiological determinants of the variation in left ventricular mass from early adolescence to late adulthood in healthy subjects Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2007, 27(4):255-262 10.1111/ j.1475-097X.2007.00735.x 17564676
15. Gopal AS Keller AM Shen Z Sapin PM Schroeder KM King DL Jr King DL Three-dimensional echocardiography: In vitro and in vivo validation of left ventricular mass and comparison with conventional echocardiographic methods J Am Coll Cardiol 1994, 24(2):504-513 8034889
16. Gopal AS Schnellbaecher MJ Shen Z Boxt LM Katz J King DL Freehand three-dimensional echocardiography for determination of left ventricular volume and mass in patients with abnormal ventricles: Comparison with magnetic resonance imaging J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997, 10(8):853-861 10.1016/S0894-7317(97)70045-2 9356950
17. Wachspress JD Clark NR Untereker WJ Kraushaar BT Kurnik PB Systolic and diastolic performance in normal human subjects as measured by ultrafast computed tomography Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1988, 15(4):277-283 10.1002/ ccd.1810150414 3228861
18. Bisi G Podio V Valetto MR Broglio F Bertuccio G G DER Boghen MF Berti F Muller EE Ghigo E Radionuclide angiocardiographic evaluation of the cardiovascular effects of recombinant human IGF-I in normal adults Eur J Endocrinol 1999, 140(4):322-327 10.1530/eje.0.1400322 10097251
19. Bottini PB Carr AA Prisant LM Flickinger FW Allison JD Gottdiener JS Magnetic resonance imaging compared to echocardiography to assess left ventricular mass in the hypertensive patient Am J Hypertens 1995, 8(3):221-228 10.1016/0895-7061(94)00178-E 7794570
20. Germain P Roul G Kastler B Mossard JM Bareiss P Sacrez A Inter-study variability in left ventricular mass measurement. Comparison between M-mode echography and MRI Eur Heart J 1992, 13(8):1011-1019 1387084
21. Bellenger NG Davies LC Francis JM Coats AJ Pennell DJ Reduction in sample size for studies of remodeling in heart failure by the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2000, 2(4):271-278 10.3109/10976640009148691 11545126
22. Plein S Bloomer TN Ridgway JP Jones TR Bainbridge GJ Sivananthan MU Steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging of the heart: comparison with segmented k-space gradient-echo imaging J Magn Reson Imaging 2001, 14(3):230-236 10.1002/jmri.1178 11536399
23. Thiele H Nagel E Paetsch I Schnackenburg B Bornstedt A Kouwenhoven M Wahl A Schuler G Fleck E Functional cardiac MR imaging with steady-state free precession (SSFP) significantly improves endocardial border delineation without contrast agents J Magn Reson Imaging 2001, 14(4):362-367 10.1002/jmri.1195 11599059
24. Michaely HJ Nael K Schoenberg SO Laub G Reiser MF Finn JP Ruehm SG Analysis of cardiac function-comparison between 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging: Preliminary experience Invest Radiol 2006, 41(2):133-140 10.1097/01.rli.0000192023.96494.af 16428984